RoSSeR 0 Posted August 26, 2011 These new games are coming out and there awesooome. Which one do u think is better? Post here Don't Hate. Personally i think battlefield is going to be Epic Battlefield 3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8pNOxynC1Dc Modern warfare 3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNjCv9OIF-M Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
benrapelisberge 0 Posted August 26, 2011 i pre-ordered battlefield 3 over mw3. ill probably end up getting both, but if i had to choose 1 i'd say battlefield. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DuckiiJr. 9 Posted August 26, 2011 I gotta go with battlefield 3 all the way! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
serbiansnaga 9 Posted August 27, 2011 clearly bf3, dont know why they are advertising mw3 as a sequel when it is just an expansion of mw2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rhododendron 994 Posted August 27, 2011 Neither since they will both suck. They are both way to similar to the previous released titles. They are just expansions and YES SERBIAN BF3 IS AN EXPANSION OF BC2 :P You can't deny it they look the same and the similarities are scarce. Plus it has all the same gameplay problems BC2 had (according to my time with alpha). Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Otherworldly 2 Posted August 27, 2011 We can sit here and argue which game is best when in reality in about a year they will both be $20 and we can buy them and not be picky about it because we aren't spending a shitton of cash on an overpriced game. Don't get me wrong, I want BF3 more than anything in the world, but it's expensive and I can wait a whole year before playing it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RoSSeR 0 Posted August 27, 2011 So there both lies!? but BF3 has a new engine Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
serbiansnaga 9 Posted August 27, 2011 the difference between bf2 and bf3 is huge, everythings different in terms of gameplay, graphics, and generally everything. btw, expansions and sequels are 2 different things, expansion is like an addon to a game, like starcraft broodwar, a sequel is the next version of the game, like starcraft 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rhododendron 994 Posted August 27, 2011 No BF3 is using the same engine as BC2. Nothing new there :/ Shadows still look as crappy as ever! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
serbiansnaga 9 Posted August 27, 2011 bf3 is using the frostbite 2.0 engine, its newer than the frostbite 1.0 engine, which bc was built with, bc2 was built with 1.5 engine Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KingJ 0 Posted August 27, 2011 Well battlefield is using frostbite 3, which is different then the one used for bc2(frostbite 2). The gameplay has gotten better, with more weapons, equipment, etc. And remember, the game is still being developed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rhododendron 994 Posted August 27, 2011 You guys need to get your facts straight lol. Gameplay is the same with new weapons and stuff so I consider it an expansion. And yes, I was wrong about the engine but the graphics aren't a big leap for the series so who can blame me :P Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Otherworldly 2 Posted August 27, 2011 it's innovation. and we have to pay extra money for it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites