realBelloWaldi 1245 Posted November 3, 2014 hasn't seen the spray myself, but from the description it doesn't appear as bad as everyone's making it out to be user doesn't seem like a complete asshole nor dumbass, has apologies for his mistakes and said he wont repeat +1 for shorten the time/second chance Same Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dragoon6542 0 Posted November 4, 2014 SO first off @xenophobic Possession of child porn is illegal and the fact that it could have been posted on the server would legally be enough to shut down XG servers. Aint nothing to fudge with. Im pretty sure that there is a legal obligation and xg could be fined or cited for not reporting it. In addition Dragoon was warned multiple times. I heard it over the mic. and the fact that he's done this before should result in a ban longer the a day even if it isn't child porn. Also why the fudge would you have a picture of doll getting steaming pantload on? I understand that if was something inappropriate to that extent, it would have grounds for possible legal action, though based on that, I wouldn't even be fighting this ban in the first place if it was. Well, the problem with that is that, it doesn't matter if others hear the warning, it only matters if I hear it (unless of course it's to confirm that yes, there was a warning), and aside from the initial time, I didn't hear one. Maybe that's my own fault, but I wasn't around to hear that warning, as I wasn't even at my computer while the spray went off (which also leads to what I've been trying to constantly say; "It wasn't me!"). Now if you're referring to yesterday's incident, there was no warning, I was just up and banned without consultation. It was assumed that the spray was made by me, even though no one knows for sure as there was no name attached to said spray. Which is the whole reason I'm fighting this. As for the picture itself, I can't really tell you, to be honest sometimes my sense of humor isn't the same as others. I do enjoy hearing others reactions to such pictures, I didn't expect it to be harmful. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dragoon6542 0 Posted November 4, 2014 Oh and I love the whole "its only a doll getting steaming pantload on, its not child porn" thing. "Guys is ok, its only some steaming pantload on a doll." I could be wrong, but I don't remember saying "only", unless you're taking that quote out of context. Saying "only" implies that the picture isn't a big deal. It is though, this is the whole reason this ban occurred. Not once did I imply "Guys is ok", I just wanted to make it known that it's not as grave as something as child porn. That being said, it's also subjective. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LeToucan 136 Posted November 4, 2014 <23:06:32> "[Lee's craptop] Lee": JUST WRITE <23:06:33> "[Lee's craptop] Lee": CLOSE <23:06:35> "[Lee's craptop] Lee": UPON <23:06:36> "[Lee's craptop] Lee": REQUEST <23:06:37> "[Lee's craptop] Lee": PLS Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
