×
  • Sign In
  • Sign In



    Or sign in with one of these services

  • Sign Up
Jump to content

ampersand

Friend of xG
  • Content Count

    20
  • Joined

  • Last visited


Reputation Activity

  1. Friendly
    ampersand got a reaction from Tsuchikure in R.i.p. Cristo Xg:a - Counter-strike: Source   
    But it wasn't a valid slay, other people in this thread say it isn't a valid slay, and like you said, it's not even confirmed if that rule is even around or existed. How does "Oh we've been breaking the rules and freeslaying for ages" make it any less of a freeslay on his part? I'm not trying to tear down the establishment here and have you all hand in your badges, I just want justice for my particular case, as it has now been brought to your attention that it wasn't a rule and starting now it would make sense to start holding people accountable. He freeslayed me. He could've instead of slaying me perhaps contacted me on Steam and had a civil discussion. We could've reached these conclusions together like a responsible admin would attempt, instead of him admin abusing and being an asshole.
  2. Disagree
    ampersand got a reaction from diabeetus in R.i.p. Cristo Xg:a - Counter-strike: Source   
    Thank you, and I agree completely with you. If you're going to hold people accountable for rules and making confusing situations, perhaps as a server you should make the rules less confusing? I myself was confused about it, so I guess in that regard, you guys(as in the server in general) broke a rule by making a confusing situation as well. Hard to hold somebody accountable for a rule that is counteracted by another rule, right? So let's move past that "Ampersand didn't repeat his orders so he deserved to get slayed anyway" argument, since it holds no merit to this discussion and was caused by a confusing set of rules anyway, which you can't hold me accountable for.