datSolarinfero 0 Posted July 31, 2014 I dont see why they should be allowed, no one uses them for dmg and only to airblast the boss off of a cliff and make the round end in 10 seconds.it makes igt less for in my oppion Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
StarmiX 4 Posted July 31, 2014 Well airblast gives the Hale more rage, so it's sort of a double-edge sword. Like oxygen that kills you when you breath it in. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
datSolarinfero 0 Posted July 31, 2014 Well airblast gives the Hale more rage, so it's sort of a double-edge sword. Like oxygen that kills you when you breath it in. But on bosses with no jump like Wheatley you cant do shit Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Barmithian 63 Posted July 31, 2014 Well its their fault if they do no damage. I see no problem with them airblasting hale off a cliff. If hale is smart, he will stay away from pyros when he is near out of bounds terrain and will wait until he has rage to kill them 2 Tsuchikure and Bach reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gugomo 0 Posted August 1, 2014 If pyro is useless, then no one will use him/her. Problem solved. No need for a ban or removal. Airblasting is more of a situational weapon while fire encourages hit and run tactics. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites