×
  • Sign In
  • Sign In



    Or sign in with one of these services

  • Sign Up
Jump to content

JakeEnglish

Friend of xG
  • Content Count

    377
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Reputation Activity

  1. Agree
    JakeEnglish reacted to Vector in Change   
    i think you coming back will fix a lot of problems. *cough* gmod is dead *cough*
  2. Agree
    JakeEnglish reacted to DaddioDoug in Stepping down for DM   
    well, glad to see you step down. I never liked you pinoy, you were an abusing, lying asshole. I really hated you. Glad to see your shit wont be around much longer.
    why do you still come on to this site and hang around and start shit. like do you have nothing better to do with your time?
  3. Agree
    JakeEnglish reacted to Jaybreeze in Stepping down for DM   
    you still suck with jarvan. pussy.
  4. F!$k Off
    JakeEnglish reacted to DaddioDoug in Donator Privileges   
    actually....
    im kind of learning how to code and yea
     
    You couldn't even inject a script into the server files when we were working on the DayZ server, what are you learning now?
    what are you talking about. every script we put in, that pbo got lost so i had to go from the original pbo and re put every script in.
    and if you dont remember this its bc this was the time you were gone for like 3 days
  5. Like
    JakeEnglish got a reaction from trinindol in (movetobanprotest) Trinindol   
    Well I guess if you made the decision to mass freekill you deserve a ban for it. However, since you're being honest I don't think it should be perm. From what I can tell you don't intend to break server rules again, but if you do you can expect a *perm* ctban or a server ban.
    +1 for change from perm to a week/ time ban of Div Manager's choice
  6. Agree
    JakeEnglish reacted to Gawd in (movetobanprotest) Trinindol   
    It would be perm if it's a mass freekill either way. Doesn't matter if it's under no balls or not lol..
     
    Any mass freekills are perm. I personally don't believe that unintentional mass's should be perm, but this was fully intentional and you knew the consequences of your actions.
  7. Not Funny
    JakeEnglish reacted to Leotekk in It was fun   
    Well here it is xG JB is or was the only thing I really enjoyed playing but it's gotten boring the past month or so. I would hop on to awp/scout for a bit but eventually got boring. I might rejoin later in the summer when the servers get populated but for now I'm out it's been really fun when in xG.


  8. Funny
    JakeEnglish reacted to Jaybreeze in Donator Privileges   
    lul
  9. Informative
    JakeEnglish reacted to Warriorsfury in Donator Privileges   
    It has been down for a few months. And unless im wrong silence said he is not working on it. Only working on tf2. So unless we find someone to code it we are not going to have hub.
  10. Ding!
    JakeEnglish reacted to Forest in Rulebreakers beware.   
    Finally found a balance between my personal life and XenoGamers, so expect to see me far more active in the CS:S Division. Just thought I'd let everyone know! Let the good times rooooooooll.
     
    - Dat guy, Forest
  11. F!$k Off
    JakeEnglish got a reaction from orangejuice in FIGHT THE FUCKING POWER! remove this mod/admin and higher ups ts rule   
    this rule has as many downs ratings as the furries do
    +1
  12. Friendly
    JakeEnglish reacted to Joshi3 in hi evr1 im back   
    hi
     
    alot of old faces fucked off
     
    alot of new people i dont like very much
     
    a few i do like
    (mudkip is not one of them)
     
    i hope you guys welcome me with a warm embrace
    and a thick loverod
    (no girls)
  13. Agree
    JakeEnglish reacted to Chrono in LAN Summoners?   
    no.
  14. Ding!
    JakeEnglish reacted to Gawd in FIGHT THE FUCKING POWER! remove this mod/admin and higher ups ts rule   
    Just in case I didn't make this clear in my previous post, I think the fact that mods and admins should be active on teamspeak is fine.
     
    But forcing them to connect to Teamspeak whenever they are on the servers is a bit too much? Most of us do it on our own anyways, just because we like being in Teamspeak to be there, not because we were forced by some rule.
     
    Furthermore, ADMIN chat and Steam work perfectly fine don't they? If there's something really THAT urgent that requires some kind of emergency briefing then ask that admin to come in if they haven't already.
     
    Today I witnessed a moderator warning a long acting admin of CSS that he was on his last chance. Shortly after he was banned. Isn't some kind of line drawn when admins that spend their free time to help keep the servers running smoothly are banned for something as minuscule as not joining Teamspeak?
  15. Agree
    JakeEnglish reacted to MineCrack in Kirito/xG:M Swarm - Counter-Strike: Source   
    Division:

    Counter-Strike: Source Staff Name:

    Kirito/xG:M Swarm Staff's Steam ID:

    STEAM_0:1:49511167 Evidence:

    Steam Community :: Error Further Information:

    So we were having a warday on Electric in pool. At around 7:12 nutella asked me to open cells, I was already in warday area and Ts were schedule to leave their cells at 7:00.
     
    I knew a few things.
    CTs can't leave warday area, and wardens can't order CTs to break rules.
    You can't order CTs to their death. Unless this rule was purged from MOTD, it stands valid.


     
    Now, on the previous map I rustled Kirito's jimmies by saying talk over warden, you will be killed or slayed. He continuously talked over me a long with other CTs, gawd began to slay them. Some even slayed themselves. Kirito refused (or he has 10 wpm typing speed, he was frolicking around so I don't know) to slay himself until Gawd slayed him.
     
    With that being said I was then freeslayed by kirito on electric. It was completely unjust, and I'm almost certain he did it because he was rustled. We can't prove that unless he admits, which he probably won't.
  16. Agree
    JakeEnglish got a reaction from DeathGod in Chronos Everywhere   
    I remember when this was funny when I was 3 years old
  17. Agree
    JakeEnglish reacted to DeathGod in Chronos Everywhere   
    you got banned because you are bad. no stay mad
  18. Disagree
    JakeEnglish got a reaction from SuperMaddud in Update 5/27/2013   
    rip in hell fucker
  19. Winner
    JakeEnglish reacted to serbiansnaga in Warriorsfury - Counter-Strike: Source   
    warrior sucked ponchers dick and got unbanned, also ponchers a pedophile hueuheuheuheuheuh
     
    -sealed away in the last great time war
  20. Disagree
    JakeEnglish got a reaction from Sparrow in Sparrow - DayZ   
    -1 attitude of a 5 year old
  21. Agree
    JakeEnglish got a reaction from Sousei in Sparrow - DayZ   
    -1 attitude of a 5 year old
  22. Agree
    JakeEnglish reacted to Gawd in Ban suggestion (Just hear me out)   
    I've already posted this in a different thread, but as a topic that I feel needs attention I am going to copy/paste what I wrote as well as add on a few things.
     
     
    With the amount of people making arguments about bans I wanted to provide my personal input and what I think makes sense.
     
    I think that we should keep perm bans PERM if they were banned for a legitimate reason and only unban if they were actually WRONGLY banned. But, seeing as this is xG we love to keep giving people second chances such as when people mass freekill (including members lately). But why do you think they do this? They do it because they know that they will be easily unbanned.
     
    Now honestly, if they make a protest in a much later time along the road maybe it can be put into consideration. They won't necessarily be unbanned, but w/ how lenient the clan is the odds are in their favor. However at least at this point they will have already served a time.
     
     
    I just don't get why these days people are considering perm bans optional. If you are permed you are permed, unless the ban itself was wrong then shouldn't any argument be done at that point?
     
    Also, not that I am in favor of taking the say away from the community but there's something wrong when somebody who just got permed (regardless of their current position or former position in the clan) can get his friends to +1 with crap saying that "he contributed a ton to the clan". Well that sucks doesn't it? Regardless of what he did in the past, he fucked up and got perm banned. We can't just unban people we like if they broke the same rules others did and were banned for it.
     
    What I suggest is, at least in some limited way, to limit the input on ban protests to mods, admins and divs of the respective division. Hopefully, (and i realize it will prolly just lead back to the same +1ing for friends situation) the staff will provide unbiased input in the protest and not simply unban bc they like the person but +1 if the ban was actually wrong.
     
    Also forgive my bs grammar typed it on my new phone still getting used to it lol
  23. Like
    JakeEnglish reacted to MineCrack in I'm finished   
    Do you even know what you're talking about?
  24. Smelly
    JakeEnglish got a reaction from Warriorsfury in Update 5/27/2013   
    rip in hell fucker
  25. Smelly
    JakeEnglish reacted to Warriorsfury in I'm finished   
    Top lel
    I suck up guys