-
Content Count
2673 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
24
Content Type
Profiles
Rules
News
Guides
Store
Forums
Calendar
Raffles
Everything posted by xGShadowSpy
-
Lol shadow i was just kidding, it was funny because of all the -1's I knew you were kidding, didnt know if they were
-
In that TS paste hidingmaster gave he didn't ask for +1s (Unless you guys mean some other time) @@Warriorsfury @@PiNoYPsYcHo Anyways, +1 , he has improved his attitude a lot, is mature, active, knows the motd, is fun to play with.
-
Rebelling on !lr motd definition/rule
xGShadowSpy replied to Hidingmaster's topic in CS:S Discussion
Well the rules say anything that normally makes them a rebel during the round makes them a rebel on LR, I.e aiming guns at CTs, going in vents/armory, and so on. Also its primary for 3 secs or more=rebel -
The massfreekill and fled part is for server ban, any mass freekiller that doesnt leave is only a CT ban, still for perm though. +1, I'd say shorten to a month, it was recent but you know the rules
-
So, let me get this straight. After having several complaints about how the MoTD was too long from our CS:S Division (both from Staff as well as Members and Players) we decided it would be best to make a shortened version a while back. Now you want us to get rid of the thing because it's too short (that resulted from non-stop complaints from you guys), just because there are a handful of incompetent CTs? I'd much rather we have players who actually take the time to click on the link then have players who just skim through the basic MoTD. The people who want a shorter MoTD are naturally just people who aren't frequenters, so why should it matter. They'll only be on for that moment of time (and most likely get CT banned) then never return. If anyone is using "it's not in the MoTD Rules" as an excuse, then that's their own damn fault. Hell, I made the link 3x the size of the other text just so it's blatantly obvious in the MoTD Rules. Honestly, if this gets pushed through I'll have lost all faith in the decisiveness of the CS:S Division I disagreed with that thread,and you say theyll likely get ct banned and never come back. My point isif they read the full motd in the first place they have less of a chance of being CT banned, and may come back. The css staff who asked for the change to be made , are lazy and don't want to read the full one. Which isn't a good reason to change it because it's encouraging their laziness.
-
Why do I have a feeling silence would do this?
-
Well when they first join, the Simple MOTD pops up, but honestly it doesn't help at all, it gives them the basic rules, then they go CT and get slayed for the specified stuff, and say "well WTF thats not in the MOTD" Granted they can just click on the link provided, but we all know out of those who do read the motd that are new they aren't going to spend their time doing that, since they have a simple one right infront of them. How to solve?- Don't give them a simple version. Im requesting the simple one be removed, and the normal more-specified one returned to normal.
-
They're putting all the top fraggers on team one, instead of spreading them around to equal the teams.
-
Hm, I guess I can play, remind me to get on when it starts
-
Rebelling on !lr motd definition/rule
xGShadowSpy replied to Hidingmaster's topic in CS:S Discussion
Don't let them in armory, the rebelling on LR is supposed to be a challenge, instead of using a plugin making them like last CT with hp Let them hold guns, but if they start aiming it at CTs and not lring within a few seconds of aiming it at the cts, or not putting it away, kill em. -
I made a thread on this and he denied it because "he didn't want people relying on ingame money instead of credits"(even though he can just remove the ingame bomb when putting hub in) +1
-
-1..no Some new Last CT Songs.
-
Bump.... again
-
Welcome
-
Which is fine, I dont expect anyone to come up with evidence that he spams a lot. But with 99.99% of the people, you warn them to stop spamming and then gag, thats how it always has gone. We never went with the excuse to kick them right away, even if they spammed occasionally. And mind you, dark said he tried to gag him but "it must have not worked". So that means dark saw no reason to kick him right away, and then used the excuse that it just must not have worked. He knows that he should have warned/gagged him first, he's admitted it... so why does everyone come up with random excuses and changes in the interpretations of rules to justify what he did as correct? Thing is lets say he had entered gag before the kick, he would have to state why after the gag, which he didn't, darkwolf has a history with jacob, jacob did the stuff with business, darkwolf dislikes him for it, acted with an immediate kick If anyone looks at the proof its obvious, also you guys keep constantly tagging higher ups, they get it the first time you tag them
-
pending gmanpacheco - Counter-Strike: Source
xGShadowSpy replied to gmanpacheco's topic in Member Submission
I'm not -1 ng you, I just have to get to know you before giving my opinion -
pending gmanpacheco - Counter-Strike: Source
xGShadowSpy replied to gmanpacheco's topic in Member Submission
I've never seen you on, and your gametime is less than 11 hours 0 -
I just searched your name on the JB rank site, and unless I searched wrong you never even played JB to know what he does, leaving me to assume you are his friend, and replying because of that, as are many other certain people.
-
Im not even mad about my demotion anymore lol. Darkwolf messaged me through private chat saying how he was sorry, about being biased and about just messing up in general, he said he'd try to stop, I accepted his apology and stopped talking about him, complaining about anything etc. Then I see what he did with jacob, I dont have anything personal against darkwolf, as much as people think I do, i just DONT LIKE what he does as a DM. That reason, lol
-
isn't that what you said about the image of deathgod saying "nigger" in the other thread, then were proven completely wrong? It has everything to do with this. this is the nth thread now on darkwolf, and it is under the same exact reason, not following a strict procedure when giving out punishments. please, think before you post. You still have not proved to me how Shadowspy being demoted by MULTIPLE DIVISION MANAGERS (Not just darkwolf) after BEING WARNED (atleast from what I heard by forest) has ANYTHING to do with an ABUSE thread on DARKWOLF. @Bolded text I don't remember this? o_O xShadowSpyx - Counter-Strike: Source Look at this post on here^ The part where he tags darkwolf
-
I find it funny how that has NOTHING to do with this? I do agree GREATLY with others and what I said which is this has been THROWN out of proportion. Jacob disrespected and was obviously asked to stop doing this before and he went on. That is why I think DARKWOLF should NOT be punished. It does not MATTER at this point that darkwolf missed a step, Jacob foiled his own thread by being an idiot and disrespecting. With this being said we should just wait for a co-leader decision and stop making us hate eachother T-T He didn't punish him for the disrespect. He punished him for spam (Which he didn't do). AND he straight up lied to hiding master And that thread has nothing to do with this? Thats showing how he was warned for this before. I dont think you really watched the demo.