Chrono
- DM
- D
- SA
- S
-
Content Count
5451 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
106
Everything posted by Chrono
-
how is Mrs. Jackson coming along bleed? oh and tell her that I am sorry... but it is for realz.
-
I'm here to cause hell. :D What is a furry? Someone who has a fetish for animals. What is a fetish? A fetish is defined as erotic or sexual significance being projected onto some nonsexual inanimate object. (What Is a Fetish?) Have fun! Also, a semi-side note pertaining to the issue of disrespect with "furries" is that I have noticed that some (not all) of the individuals who are furries within xG take offense when they get called a "furfag" yet you go around and call yourselves furfags, and each other furfags.
-
that's what he said. "rare occassion" which means 99999999999/100000000000 times, it will be a legit kill since the door to warday will rarely be directly in front of armory.
-
Further development on this story, they seem to have been turned into zombies. They continue to mumble the phrase "League is love... League is life..." You may want to start looking into new "Higher-ups" right about now.
-
my blood lust has been satisfied. back to calling people faggots.
-
nonononononono. see, when you try to change this as such, it circumvents the original "participation is mandatory" piece. if you are near the warday area, you better expect to be shot (the only exception being that where you have to run from cells across to the other side of the door to get to armory [even then, you can go along the back wall, not directly by door.]) and if you shoot through the main door to the warday area, again, you are fine. particiaption is mandatory, if anything, the CTs are slaying you with bullets for not participating. "baiting a freekill" is really just using you as an unarmed T to body block for your friend with an AWP. you deserve the headshot you get.
-
that's the point. it didn't get him demoted, and it was something said specifically to be a nono, and in many of our minds cash @all 30k effects the game more than 1 round of ban @all. and they both did a vote on it.
-
Wait.... people yell at you for calling those who don't understand the rules "faggots" even though they have been explained how the rule works more than a dozen times? There is seriously an issue here...
-
my nigga
-
As you are wearing another set of tags in your name. "[HS]" What is HS? Care to elaborate?
-
All in all, just give him back admin. he was one of the best admins, and you (the "higher ups") demoted him for something the server in whole agreed to.
-
"participation is mandatory" by this statement, unless they are actively running with no gun to the armory, they are not participating (if they have no gun, and there are no teleports to war day location) thus, you should kill them anyway and when they complain, call them faggots.
-
Back to the point, with ban @all you effectively remove knives from all players. CTs still get guns etc from the extras in armory, and Ts MUST escape and rebel to find a gun. imo ban @all does not have a large effect on the flow of the game other than 1 round of it being a bit rough for the Ts to rebel which again imo, is perfectly fine. this is jailbreak, the idea is that it should be rough for Ts to rebel etc, and yet over the years there have been rules added here and there making it 9999999999999999x easier for the Ts (note: now it is rare to see more than 1-2 rounds won by the CTs, and few rounds get to LR. typically all CTs die.) The game mode itself is designed specifically for the CTs to have numerous advantages so that it is a rough spot for the Ts, and they have effectively been removed. So really, I have no clue whatsoever what darkwolf's issue was in the first place with the 1 round of it being slightly harder for the Ts to rebel and win, that was voted for and approved by most of the server. (71% of 7 votes is 5/7) and this truly only affected 1 round. As opposed to the other case where cash was given to all players in the form of 30k (a large bomb) which unless it was done the very last round before map change (which it wasn't) affected every round afterwards. I completely agree here. I'm not quite sure it actually is "forbidden" as it used to be a joke that we would ban @all (when gay boy was around) and he would tell us no balls since you can't actually ban @all, as far as I remember there was never actually a time where it was said "ban @all is a forbidden command, and nobody is allowed to use it whatsoever for any reason at all." and if that were the case, then how come silence or darkwolf never gave it a though to add it in as an override that the phrase "sm_ban @all" could only be accessed by people with flag "z"? Where as with the case of cash you actually did say "it is not allowed at all" granted it wasn't communicated very well, there is still the case of it actually being said.
-
It's impossible for there to have been 100% yes votes for hella if there was a report abuse, and names were mentioned to testify... Again, I don't see the reason he was demoted if server wide there was atleast like 85% approval of 1 round of it.
-
no.
-
@@Forest there are seemingly large amounts of different treatments for different people, I am posting here because someone brought up hella, John gave hella permission to use money giving to everyone, if they voted for it. they did, hella did it, he has an abuse report, closed later under "confusion". nothing happened. There was 1 complaint noted from the people on at the time of hella's "abuse" in this case, the server here agreed to the ban @all via vote as well, he did it. the server agreed. there was (by my understanding) 1 complaint about it, and he was demoted for it. in essence these are the same situation, infact i'd go so far as to say Aaron's situation is much less "server damaging" than john/hella's because Aaron's truly only gives effect to 1 round, where as theirs gives effect to multiple (30k cash can be a bomb per round until map change). IMO Aaron should receive his ORIGINAL admin powers back or John should be demoted (to member like Aaron), based on this conclusion. I say @@John because hella only acted on what John gave him permission to do, he was sort of the middle man. [it would basically be like john doing !cash @all without asking his higher ups, as aaron did ban @all without asking his.] {note this is what should have happened imo prior to john's resignation, as he is a poopy butt and i hate him now.} TL;DR your guys' logic in hella's thread suggests that Aaron should have retained his admin in the first place, otherwise you should find some sort of punishment for John.
-
Why are you giving him so much shit for it, when warrior first claimed he had a bind for smite @all and you didn't give him shit? (before he said his cat typed it, and or hit the bind.)
-
>#britswag >forest >forest is british >3 arrows prior to this >half life 3 confirmed +1 #brit
-
I know the problem with xG. People not watching streams. [MEDIA=twitch]channel=chronosnite[/MEDIA]
-
I actually like just black, 2 sugars, 2 creams. (for if they do individual packets) or if it is by the jar/bottle, until i feel good.
-
Stop. Closed.
