Forest

3 seconds instead of 2? Or do you mean that the Warden gives the Ts 3 seconds to perform the chain of commands? like. warden does a chain of things. within reason, no bullshit long stuff. then Ts must repeat it. then he gives a few seconds, rinse, repeat. But the whole point of this is for the commands to stack on each other, thus making it a memory game (just like the original Simon Says game, which you can find on the OP)

Alright, since this has been implemented into the MoTD Rules, this thread is no longer necessary. #Closing ~ Forgotten in the Lost Woods

3 seconds instead of 2? Or do you mean that the Warden gives the Ts 3 seconds to perform the chain of commands?

Grave digging this thread as there are a few edits and seeing as the majority of members/players thought it worked out well, @@DarkWolf6052 and @@Gkoo for the implementation. The next post I make after this one will be the "official" MoTD Rules version.

do it yourself pussy. ANNNNNYWAYS, some staff already decided to do mimic me on csgo, worked out kinda ok, someone was confused on what the ct did since he went a little fast, but that's the name of the game. probably restrict that until after 5 since it could be considered "tarping" if someone is slow in the brain. Fair enough. I'll edit in that it can only be played after 5:00 (however, even if it's after 5:00, Warden may not tarp in the game as it is already difficult enough). I will also add another addition that there has to be 2 seconds between each "command" that the Warden is performing. For example, if the current chain of commands is Jump>Jump>Crouch>Jump then it would go like this: Jump>2 seconds>Jump>2 seconds>Crouch>2 seconds>Jump This will prevent Warden from doing the chain of commands too quickly.

Not quite. Remember, "Anything that is not in the MoTD must be approved by Admins". I mean, go right ahead and test something out if you want to, just make sure you have the approval of the Staff Members on at the time. But don't be intimidated, as most of us will agree on it if it's a good idea!

Time to drink? Time to drink.

Me gettin' a wicked bark-tan on the right. Ex on the left, don't know what I saw in her. She was a total birch. that gave me wood [attach]5172[/ATTACH] Really? Hardwood or what. As much of a stud I am, I didn't think fir a second that pic would end up rustling anyone's leaves.

Pics ?<3 Me gettin' a wicked bark-tan on the right. Ex on the left, don't know what I saw in her. She was a total birch.

Not something I can edit. @@Rhododendron can edit it though. You can't edit it? Nope, there's no way for me to edit it. Only options given are Delete, IP, Warn, Report, and Reply

Not something I can edit. @@Rhododendron can edit it though.

#Closing as this was a mishap and was requested from OP. ~ Forgotten in the Lost Woods

Alright I enabled it but it will only work for donators. Basically you must have donated within the past 7 days or you will be unable to make an application. We need money so it would really help out! Good luck! So when you have donated (within 7 days), how do you go through the process of submitting one? Upon donation, will a new section be opened under "Applications" in which you can fill out a Moderator Submission? Or if upon donation you will be able to "Post a Thread" under Moderator Submission?

I'm Forest and I photosynthesize in the nude.

To be completely honest, CTs [not warden] who are intentionally tarping [before 5:00] for the sole purpose of getting Ts killed is a slayable offense. Because our MoTD Rules states that tarping is "giving out orders that conflict each other", it's justifiable to slay a CT who is not warden by giving a "conflicting order" to that of the Warden's legitimate order.

Before this goes any further, @@Rhododendron for his opinion on the matter as it was he who removed that section due to a rise in Moderators/Administrators(?). It's completely his decision. I will, however, say that we can handle 'x' amount of Moderators/Adminstrators (at least, I can, can't exactly speak for @@DarkWolf6052 or @@Gkoo ).

How many times does it have to be posted before people start learning? How many times does it have to be posted to use our Report Abuse/Member Protest sections with video/screenshot proof? Honestly, anyone who sees it happening and is standing aside just watching, is as much to blame as the Staff Member abusing. Swallow your pride, get your hands dirty, and help us out. I understand it's our job to weed out the baddies, but we (DMs) aren't on all the time to see these things happening, and when we are, Staff Members are almost always on their best behavior because a Division Manager is on. How can we apprehend an abusing Staff Member without any evidence or proof given other than "This guy is abusing". We cannot just act on words alone. Remember; everyone is considered innocent in our eyes unless proved otherwise by cold hard evidence/proof.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YV4oYkIeGJc Have to post this. It's just been stuck in my head all day. Fackin' Disturbed.

In addition, I apologize to @@Warriorsfury @@ItsAaron @@Hidingmaster if I offended you in any way. I was not intending it like that, nor did I mean to upset you if I did. (posting this separate as mentions get iffy when edited in).

For the exact reason that was posted in that thread. Serbian wanted to look into it, and determined that a holyshitflamewar would start if it was left open, thereby asking it be closed. I'm sorry to say, but there is a large comparison between an Admin and a Division Manager. We carry the responsibility of being asked questions regarding the MoTD, and we are expected to know it 100%. Not that Administrators aren't required either, but the title demands more responsibility and knowledge when dealing with anything MoTD related. If it were any other Staff Position lower than a DM, you're right, it would most likely remain open because it isn't expected that Administrators (who only have the ability to start votes and are nearly the same as Mods, no offence, seriously, just making a point) know every single little detail. But the fact that there are people [i'll admit it] out to get Darkwolf, [a Division Manager who not only deals with the MoTD, but also deals with constant bombardments of questions] and have him demoted means insta flaming and griefing. I'm not disagreeing that it should not have been closed, because I honestly think it should be opened, but because half of our Staff Members can't reply in a mature manner without blowing things out of proportion, it was closed so that serbian would leave a reply. (Dat wall of text.) Again, going to be completely honest here, 100%. This had nothing to do with trust or knowing the rules. 0. None. Non-existant. I was in no way intentionally disrespecting or calling anyone out (and I'm sorry if it was taken that way) in regards to this. All I am trying to do is make the way our Staff Members moderate more thorough and less impulsive. Why Can't you ask the player why you were killed? It's not a matter of pride, nor is it a matter of know-how in regards to the MoTD Rules. Are you not as reluctant to ask why someone else was killed before slaying them? We ask so that we can be 100% sure, so that we can let them know they dun goof'd and that they won't end up doing it again. I have seen so many occasions where a Staff Member will slay someone without asking, or even providing a reason as to why they were slain. I'm not enforcing this rule to spite you guys or anything of the sort, so much as I am trying to make things more thorough and easier to comprehend. Would you not be upset if you were slain for doing something you thought was right, only to not be told what it is you did wrong, or being instantly CT banned? I for one would be upset and confused, and more than likely to end up mass freekilling due to frustration, all because a Staff Member didn't tell me what I did was wrong or told me why I was slain. I'm also not saying acting so hostile in addressing it too, things like "Idiot, don't freekill." Is that really necessary? Can you not respectfully tell them what they did was wrong? These are the reasons why I am so prone on getting our Staff to be more involved in what they do. And again, I apologize that it came out the way it did ingame. I know you guys are great Staff Members, and you all deserved your ranks, but all I ask is that you give a little bit of thought to what I've said here. I completely agree. I assume this is directed to All of us as DMs, and I respect your opinion to let us know. You're 100% right, there should not be a time where one of us says something is wrong for the reason "Because we said so", nor is that a tolerable answer. I implore you to please notify myself or one of the other DMs that this is happening, so that we may talk to the other regarding this obvious ongoing problem. So, this is a rather lengthy document, but I feel that you need the most detailed and accurate opinion I can give regarding these issues. As for the other claims brought up, I can agree that there are things that the community should be more aware of including the changing of MoTD Rules. But please, give us some time to work out these problems. There are only three of us, and to be quite honest, there is a problem with all three of us as DMs (we all have our faults), whether it be the lack of activity, lack of unbiased reasoning or just lack of responsibility. I apologize on behalf of us all for not being able to make the CS:S Division a more enjoyable "experience". TL;DR - Sorry guys, not this time. Going to have to go through it all as I did pour my heart out into this. - Dat guy, Forest

+1 :Old Man:b

I'm sorry to say, but our ZE/ZM server is nearly dead, and I don't just mean lack of players. Several plugins are broken, and it's just not looking good. It may end up being shut down as it is just excess server space that isn't needed.

Has anyone successfully tested any of these games yet?

Welcome back to the clan m8! I'm a new-fag DM of the CS:S Division, so you'll most likely see me around. The name's [obviously] Forest!

Then how am i 13 and in the clan :3? Because you got into xG before this new requirement was enforced. Sorry mate, but we do have a minimum age requirement of 14 when applying for Membership. #Closing this Member Submission, reapply in a couple of years. I apologize for the inconvenience. ~ Forgotten in the Lost Woods