realBelloWaldi

Where is the point of forcing staff members to vote then?

I have an idea. Let's say: If you're 16+ You need at least 10 vouches If you're under 16 (but over 14) You need a division leader or a division manager to vouch for you. You need 15 +1s If you're under 14: You need a division leader to vouch for you. You need a division manager to vouch for you. You need an admin to vouch for you You need at least 20 +1s. If one of the said staff members -1 you, your member application gets closed immediately. What do you think about this system?

The Mental Maturity Test or My Mental Age Test

Responsible* God damnit

No. -1. That's no reason to mass-freekill. That was just stupid and you're responsi for your own actions.

+1 very active and nice overall also very polite and knows the rules a:7 m:10

@Stan_Laurel asked me to create an inactivity thread. His father took his PC, so he can't get on the forums anymore. @Dethman @Ghosty @The_Unlit_Torch @Rejects We'll see him on July 15 again!

This just proves that she was spamming, do you have any evidennce about trolling or disrespect?

Bump! @Ohstopyou @kbraszzz @Rejects @metalslug53

Oh no ;_;. Rip you..

Now you can be xG:M:M

gratz

this was pretty dank. :dank:

You were banned by @kbraszzz for phsing.

+1 active on pokemon and a nice guy overall a:9 m:7