Ban Request For Inappropriate Spray

[Forest 309]

Came to my attention just a few moments ago, and I realized that this is one of those finicky things that are difficult to handle. Reason being that it's something that requires a warning before a ban can be dealt. A simple remedy can be made for this, something that I feel makes a ban far more justified (if you're like me, you don't like to jump the gun and go straight to a ban as everyone deserves a chance). So, the procedure for posting a Ban Request against someone for having an inappropriate spray would follow something like this:

 

Ban Request for an inappropriate spray must include the following:

- A screenshot of the offender's inappropriate spray

- A screenshot of the one posting the thread asking the offending player to change their spray ingame

- A screenshot of the offending player's changed spray, or alternatively their answer to the request ingame

 

This way, the offending player has an opportunity to change their spray without facing a day ban immediately. It will also eliminate those rare moments when the person banned gets on and protests their ban saying "well, I wasn't warned to change it".

 

While minor, this sort of thing can and does happen every so often. What do you guys think? Should this be something that should be included for a Ban Request toward an inappropriate spray, or should the ban hammer just be dropped immediately without question?

 

As usual; discuss, comment or compliment each other on new haircuts below.

 

*EDIT: this concept only applies under the following conditions:

 

1. There is no Staff Member online

2. A Staff Member cannot get online to enforce against inappropriate spray(s)

3. A Player/Member wishes to take matters into their own hands by posting a Ban Request

4. A player had an inappropriate spray, but is no longer on the Server (though honestly shouldn't be worth chasing after)

[Matsi 35]

Came to my attention just a few moments ago, and I realized that this is one of those finicky things that are difficult to handle. Reason being that it's something that requires a warning before a ban can be dealt. A simple remedy can be made for this, something that I feel makes a ban far more justified (if you're like me, you don't like to jump the gun and go straight to a ban as everyone deserves a chance). So, the procedure for posting a Ban Request against someone for having an inappropriate spray would follow something like this:

 

Ban Request for an inappropriate spray must include the following:

- A screenshot of the offender's inappropriate spray

- A screenshot of the one posting the thread asking the offending player to change their spray ingame

- A screenshot of the offending player's changed spray, or alternatively their answer to the request ingame

 

This way, the offending player has an opportunity to change their spray without facing a day ban immediately. It will also eliminate those rare moments when the person banned gets on and protests their ban saying "well, I wasn't warned to change it".

 

While minor, this sort of thing can and does happen every so often. What do you guys think? Should this be something that should be included for a Ban Request toward an inappropriate spray, or should the ban hammer just be dropped immediately without question?

 

As usual; discuss, comment or compliment each other on new haircuts below.

 

Seems good, tho a lot of the time people prolly wont reply to you saying they should change it so that shouldn't be "required"

 

I've seen a plugin where you can ban a players ability to spray, but the one I found so far perms them from doing it until you unban them... maybe we could find one that lets you do like day spray ban or make such a thing? @Nomulous

[Waimalu 1]

I don't believe it's bad enough for a ban request. If staff can't handle it (whether they can't see the spray or whatever) I can possibly see the use of a ban request but still doesn't seem necessary. It's the staff members responsibility to warn the offender.

[Matsi 35]

I don't believe it's bad enough for a ban request. If staff can't handle it (whether they can't see the spray or whatever) I can possibly see the use of a ban request but still doesn't seem necessary. It's the staff members responsibility to warn the offender.

I just wanted to add, you can use !adminspray name to manually spray their spray after you've joined, in the case of calladmins.

 

so like.. you join and any spray already down you can't see

type for example: /adminspray matsi

This sprays matsi's spray where you're aiming.

 

I think this cmd is mod+ but it might be admin+ I also do not know if it's enabled on every server, tho it works on JB

[Forest 309]

Seems good, tho a lot of the time people prolly wont reply to you saying they should change it so that shouldn't be "required"

They won't always reply, but it's just to ensure that the offending player actually saw the message. Another counter to the "I didn't see a warning" protest. If anything, it would just look like a typical "please change your spray or I'll inform a Moderator/Administrator", though this time it would actually be a warning and not some 10 year old trying to act tough.

I don't believe it's bad enough for a ban request. If staff can't handle it (whether they can't see the spray or whatever) I can possibly see the use of a ban request but still doesn't seem necessary. It's the staff members responsibility to warn the offender.

It isn't, but this is assuming there isn't a Staff Member on during the time to warn the player. It's more of just a precautionary measure that gives the player the ability to personally take care of a another player who refuses to change their inappropriate spray. In a way, it's no different than a Staff Member asking that the player change their spray. The only difference is that there is no kick between the warning and ban, but there is only so much you can work with when reporting a player on the forums. The likelihood of this scenario happening is incredibly slim, but it is something that can happen, so why not be prepared, you know what I mean?

[Hidingmaster 19]

Came to my attention just a few moments ago, and I realized that this is one of those finicky things that are difficult to handle. Reason being that it's something that requires a warning before a ban can be dealt. A simple remedy can be made for this, something that I feel makes a ban far more justified (if you're like me, you don't like to jump the gun and go straight to a ban as everyone deserves a chance). So, the procedure for posting a Ban Request against someone for having an inappropriate spray would follow something like this:

 

Ban Request for an inappropriate spray must include the following:

- A screenshot of the offender's inappropriate spray

- A screenshot of the one posting the thread asking the offending player to change their spray ingame

- A screenshot of the offending player's changed spray, or alternatively their answer to the request ingame

 

This way, the offending player has an opportunity to change their spray without facing a day ban immediately. It will also eliminate those rare moments when the person banned gets on and protests their ban saying "well, I wasn't warned to change it".

 

While minor, this sort of thing can and does happen every so often. What do you guys think? Should this be something that should be included for a Ban Request toward an inappropriate spray, or should the ban hammer just be dropped immediately without question?

 

As usual; discuss, comment or compliment each other on new haircuts below.

 

Nice haircut, suits your face shape well.

 

This is the way that is should be done, if it ever got as far as a ban request. As far as I'm concerned though, CSS had a good system. Warning, kick, ban. If they didnt "get" the warning, they sure in the hell got the kick.

[Matsi 35]

Nice haircut, suits your face shape well.

 

This is the way that is should be done, if it ever got as far as a ban request. As far as I'm concerned though, CSS had a good system. Warning, kick, ban. If they didnt "get" the warning, they sure in the hell got the kick.

 

well that implies there's a staff on to do it, I believe forest was specifically talking about ban requests for when that isn't the case.

 

Personally I use removespray and warn, I also usually warn them myself in chat/voice, then if I see it again I removespray+kick, when/if they come back I warn them that the next time I see the spray it'll be a ban.... which I do with removespray as well, I think it's like 5 minutes, if they continue after they get back I ban them manually for like 6/12/24hrs depending on how douchey they are being about it when I ask them to stop spraying. =/

[Hidingmaster 19]

well that implies there's a staff on to do it, I believe forest was specifically talking about ban requests for when that isn't the case.

 

Personally I use removespray and warn, I also usually warn them myself in chat/voice, then if I see it again I removespray+kick, when/if they come back I warn them that the next time I see the spray it'll be a ban.... which I do with removespray as well, I think it's like 5 minutes, if they continue after they get back I ban them manually for like 6/12/24hrs depending on how douchey they are being about it when I ask them to stop spraying. =/

 

Then yeah, this is a valid solution.

[Owl 192]

CSGO DOESNT HAVE SPRAYS WAHHHHHHHHHHHHH

[Matsi 35]

CSGO DOESNT HAVE SPRAYS WAHHHHHHHHHHHHH

[CS:GO] Sprays v1.4.1 (you can use sprays in CS:GO) - AlliedModders

[Forest 309]

Nice haircut, suits your face shape well.

Aw, thanks man. Just had it cut the other day. But yeah, as Matsi said, this all only applies when a Staff Member isn't online or can't get on to deal with the problem. A citizen's arrest, so to speak.

[Matsi 35]

@Nomulous [ANY] Ban Player's Spray - AlliedModders

This is the one I found, the last few posts in the thread are several people asking for timed bans, so he might make it a thing soon too...

 

I think it would be great to have sprays like com bans are... so for ban requests you could just SB ban the guy from being able to spray for a day or week or w/e... IDK how hard that would be to do....

[Duke 85]

im just glad i dont have to deal with this shit on csgo. i mean it sucks we dont have sprays but its probly for the better so i dont have to see furry porn or nasty bullshit sprays so its good.

[Forest 309]

for ban requests you could just SB ban the guy from being able to spray for a day or week or w/e

This is a great alternative if this could be set-up. Though what happens when they try to spray? Do they get some sort of SM message stating why they can't spray, or does it just do nothing? My only concern is that people may think that it's bugged or glitched as opposed to them thinking that they have been "banned" from spraying. It wouldn't be as effective if there wasn't some sort of warning/reason accompanied with it that the offending player can see. That is, someone can't learn from their mistake if they don't know what their mistake is to begin with.

[Ohstopyou 42]

Came to my attention just a few moments ago, and I realized that this is one of those finicky things that are difficult to handle. Reason being that it's something that requires a warning before a ban can be dealt. A simple remedy can be made for this, something that I feel makes a ban far more justified (if you're like me, you don't like to jump the gun and go straight to a ban as everyone deserves a chance). So, the procedure for posting a Ban Request against someone for having an inappropriate spray would follow something like this:

 

Ban Request for an inappropriate spray must include the following:

- A screenshot of the offender's inappropriate spray

- A screenshot of the one posting the thread asking the offending player to change their spray ingame

- A screenshot of the offending player's changed spray, or alternatively their answer to the request ingame

 

This way, the offending player has an opportunity to change their spray without facing a day ban immediately. It will also eliminate those rare moments when the person banned gets on and protests their ban saying "well, I wasn't warned to change it".

 

While minor, this sort of thing can and does happen every so often. What do you guys think? Should this be something that should be included for a Ban Request toward an inappropriate spray, or should the ban hammer just be dropped immediately without question?

 

As usual; discuss, comment or compliment each other on new haircuts below.

I only go for a ban if they keep spraying it over and over after being warned, they are a regular (whom I know or a staff knows), or both. Please note, this is not before another staff member or I have spoken to them. We normally ask them three times to stop spraying it, and if we get resistance or no response it's ended there.

 

The offender doesn't have to change their spray. They just have to stop spraying it on the server.

 

That's my strategy on it.