×
  • Sign In
  • Sign In



    Or sign in with one of these services

  • Sign Up
Jump to content

Chrono

Members
  • DM
  • D
  • SA
  • S
  • Content Count

    5447
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    106

Reputation Activity

  1. Useful
    Chrono got a reaction from Brian in So is CS:S div dead or what   
    it's hard to improve the server as a DLeader unless you have 1337 skillz with programming stuffz like plugins.
  2. Boring
    Chrono got a reaction from Brian in So is CS:S div dead or what   
    2 words. Hat Packs.
  3. Agree
    Chrono got a reaction from Brian in Haadron is a furry.   
    The boy we all once came to know and love has a dark secret I just discovered...
     

  4. F!$k Off
    Chrono got a reaction from Brian in Written Test   
    this is america not canadia
  5. Drunk
    Chrono got a reaction from Brian in Community   
    @@Rhododendron thread title is community. it sucks.
  6. Informative
    Chrono got a reaction from diabeetus in DerpO_o - Counter-Strike: Source   
    Well considering this thread has gone nowhere and has done nothing but created fighting and flaming for a crap-ton of posts, i think i'm gonna close it, unless @@DarkWolf6052 wants to say something else.
    The div leader has CT banned you, there's almost no chance of getting out unless he was trolling on banning you, which he most likely wasn't. Sorry, but wait it out.
    -Closed
  7. Informative
    Chrono got a reaction from LeToucan in Member Tag Discussion   
    My steam name is Marksman.
  8. F!$k Off
    Chrono got a reaction from Tsuchikure in DerpO_o - Counter-Strike: Source   
    Well considering this thread has gone nowhere and has done nothing but created fighting and flaming for a crap-ton of posts, i think i'm gonna close it, unless @@DarkWolf6052 wants to say something else.
    The div leader has CT banned you, there's almost no chance of getting out unless he was trolling on banning you, which he most likely wasn't. Sorry, but wait it out.
    -Closed
  9. Informative
    Chrono got a reaction from LeToucan in Written Test   
    this is america not canadia
  10. Agree
    Chrono got a reaction from Sousei in Written Test   
    i got 100% on it, and i only read over the handbook like th 1 hr before test
  11. Like
    Chrono got a reaction from xGShadowSpy in So is CS:S div dead or what   
    2 words. Hat Packs.
  12. Agree
    Chrono got a reaction from xGShadowSpy in Minecrack - Counter-Strike: Source   
    If you are going to take offense to it though, you are not allowed to go around saying "I AM A PROUD FURFAG" just like if you are going to gag someone for saying "nigger" in admin chat, I expect to NEVER see or hear you say the word nigger with the other people in that admin chat. (oh wait, that happened.)
  13. Ding!
    Chrono got a reaction from diabeetus in Minecrack - Counter-Strike: Source   
    If you are going to take offense to it though, you are not allowed to go around saying "I AM A PROUD FURFAG" just like if you are going to gag someone for saying "nigger" in admin chat, I expect to NEVER see or hear you say the word nigger with the other people in that admin chat. (oh wait, that happened.)
  14. Creative
    Chrono got a reaction from Brian in So is CS:S div dead or what   
    We're NOT unbanning LQ again though. He used his chance, and had a good run. But unlike others before me, I don't give infinite chances to people like him. #neteX2.0
  15. Informative
    Chrono got a reaction from LeToucan in Minecrack - Counter-Strike: Source   
    I'm here to cause hell. :D
     
    What is a furry?


    Someone who has a fetish for animals.
    What is a fetish?


    A fetish is defined as erotic or sexual significance being projected onto some nonsexual inanimate object. (What Is a Fetish?)
     
    Have fun!
     
    Also, a semi-side note pertaining to the issue of disrespect with "furries" is that I have noticed that some (not all) of the individuals who are furries within xG take offense when they get called a "furfag" yet you go around and call yourselves furfags, and each other furfags.
  16. Agree
    Chrono got a reaction from DCook in ItsAaron - Counter-Strike: Source   
    i'm not disagreeing that the "approved late night jailbreak" which promoted abuse was a bad thing. I'm saying that "poor choice to fix a bad situation" does not justify his actions 1 bit.
  17. Agree
    Chrono got a reaction from xGShadowSpy in ItsAaron - Counter-Strike: Source   
    i'm not disagreeing that the "approved late night jailbreak" which promoted abuse was a bad thing. I'm saying that "poor choice to fix a bad situation" does not justify his actions 1 bit.
  18. Agree
    Chrono got a reaction from diabeetus in ItsAaron - Counter-Strike: Source   
    i'm not disagreeing that the "approved late night jailbreak" which promoted abuse was a bad thing. I'm saying that "poor choice to fix a bad situation" does not justify his actions 1 bit.
  19. Friendly
    Chrono got a reaction from Sousei in ItsAaron - Counter-Strike: Source   
    He was there. So was I. We were both in game.
    The only one making themselves look stupid here, is you. Your attitude is the only problem anywhere you post.
     
    The get down to it fact of the matter is:
     
    Warrior was in server, there was a situation, he handled it very wrongly (beyond outside of the realm of what he should have done to handle the situation [slay warden, all chat invalid freeday etc.] rather) by smiting all. In continuation of this, I am not disagreeing that the intentions were good, but when you put it down in black and white, the bottom line is it was abuse and it was such in a way of doing something strictly forbidden. Our argument here (regardless of you not being Co at the time) is that the way the "higher ups" (darkwolf was a "higher up in this case as well", and is in this case) did not handle it correctly. the punishment for something strictly forbidden is demotion immediately to member as well as depending on the issue, potentially permanent bans. however instead of following that, we are pointing out that it was overlooked and rather than demoted from Admin to Member (or non member in the case of a perm ban) he was demoted only from Admin to Mod (which is a joke since there is literally no difference, "oh no I can't make votes that I get in trouble for anyway by the nazi regime ruling over fun") and my initial permanent ban given to him through source bans (as that was the standard) got reduced by serbian to a month, and then later removed by poncher after 24 hrs from initial time of ban. There is really only 1 thing that really stands out in this case as opposed to Aaron's case.
    Warrior is on a very friendly standing with the "higher ups" (namely darkwolf [reference to my thread in admin discussion here]) where as Aaron (the other culprit of this "strictly forbidden" abuse) is punished to the almost full extent (I say almost because he wasn't perm banned, only demoted to member) which is still way more severe than warrior's case.
     
    All these statements in this thread are points about favoritism, and how unfair the "higher ups" are being, and it is a point I have been pushing for a long time now as something that needs to be looked at, we are taking baby steps, but there are still more cases that come up along the way which push us back.
     
    @@Forest if you would like to have a more in depth discussion and not clog this thread up, please by all means, log on steam. then message me. where I could also provide links etc to some things.
  20. Like
    Chrono got a reaction from Tsuchikure in ItsAaron - Counter-Strike: Source   
    He was there. So was I. We were both in game.
    The only one making themselves look stupid here, is you. Your attitude is the only problem anywhere you post.
     
    The get down to it fact of the matter is:
     
    Warrior was in server, there was a situation, he handled it very wrongly (beyond outside of the realm of what he should have done to handle the situation [slay warden, all chat invalid freeday etc.] rather) by smiting all. In continuation of this, I am not disagreeing that the intentions were good, but when you put it down in black and white, the bottom line is it was abuse and it was such in a way of doing something strictly forbidden. Our argument here (regardless of you not being Co at the time) is that the way the "higher ups" (darkwolf was a "higher up in this case as well", and is in this case) did not handle it correctly. the punishment for something strictly forbidden is demotion immediately to member as well as depending on the issue, potentially permanent bans. however instead of following that, we are pointing out that it was overlooked and rather than demoted from Admin to Member (or non member in the case of a perm ban) he was demoted only from Admin to Mod (which is a joke since there is literally no difference, "oh no I can't make votes that I get in trouble for anyway by the nazi regime ruling over fun") and my initial permanent ban given to him through source bans (as that was the standard) got reduced by serbian to a month, and then later removed by poncher after 24 hrs from initial time of ban. There is really only 1 thing that really stands out in this case as opposed to Aaron's case.
    Warrior is on a very friendly standing with the "higher ups" (namely darkwolf [reference to my thread in admin discussion here]) where as Aaron (the other culprit of this "strictly forbidden" abuse) is punished to the almost full extent (I say almost because he wasn't perm banned, only demoted to member) which is still way more severe than warrior's case.
     
    All these statements in this thread are points about favoritism, and how unfair the "higher ups" are being, and it is a point I have been pushing for a long time now as something that needs to be looked at, we are taking baby steps, but there are still more cases that come up along the way which push us back.
     
    @@Forest if you would like to have a more in depth discussion and not clog this thread up, please by all means, log on steam. then message me. where I could also provide links etc to some things.
  21. Like
    Chrono got a reaction from DCook in ItsAaron - Counter-Strike: Source   
    He was there. So was I. We were both in game.
    The only one making themselves look stupid here, is you. Your attitude is the only problem anywhere you post.
     
    The get down to it fact of the matter is:
     
    Warrior was in server, there was a situation, he handled it very wrongly (beyond outside of the realm of what he should have done to handle the situation [slay warden, all chat invalid freeday etc.] rather) by smiting all. In continuation of this, I am not disagreeing that the intentions were good, but when you put it down in black and white, the bottom line is it was abuse and it was such in a way of doing something strictly forbidden. Our argument here (regardless of you not being Co at the time) is that the way the "higher ups" (darkwolf was a "higher up in this case as well", and is in this case) did not handle it correctly. the punishment for something strictly forbidden is demotion immediately to member as well as depending on the issue, potentially permanent bans. however instead of following that, we are pointing out that it was overlooked and rather than demoted from Admin to Member (or non member in the case of a perm ban) he was demoted only from Admin to Mod (which is a joke since there is literally no difference, "oh no I can't make votes that I get in trouble for anyway by the nazi regime ruling over fun") and my initial permanent ban given to him through source bans (as that was the standard) got reduced by serbian to a month, and then later removed by poncher after 24 hrs from initial time of ban. There is really only 1 thing that really stands out in this case as opposed to Aaron's case.
    Warrior is on a very friendly standing with the "higher ups" (namely darkwolf [reference to my thread in admin discussion here]) where as Aaron (the other culprit of this "strictly forbidden" abuse) is punished to the almost full extent (I say almost because he wasn't perm banned, only demoted to member) which is still way more severe than warrior's case.
     
    All these statements in this thread are points about favoritism, and how unfair the "higher ups" are being, and it is a point I have been pushing for a long time now as something that needs to be looked at, we are taking baby steps, but there are still more cases that come up along the way which push us back.
     
    @@Forest if you would like to have a more in depth discussion and not clog this thread up, please by all means, log on steam. then message me. where I could also provide links etc to some things.
  22. Smelly
    Chrono reacted to MineCrack in ItsAaron - Counter-Strike: Source   
    For one, it wasn't 10+ people (7-8, I think you meant 10+ people complaining). Two, he simply dealt with the situation poorly. There were a large amount of people complaining about the day which was then restricted in the motd later that day. I brought it up with higher ups but nothing was done because not enough complaints have gone through. People thought it was hilarious at first, then it started happening frequently (then it became a problem). You should stop trying to make him look bad, it's just making you look stupid in front of all the people who were actually there.
  23. Agree
    Chrono reacted to diabeetus in ItsAaron - Counter-Strike: Source   
    @@Forest, how could anyone comprehend that freesmiting 10+ people would be beneficial towards the server? I was there, he did it because he got killed just before the invalid wasd freeday was called and got bored (which he also did without consulting any of the other staff members on at the time, myself included). Anyone with half of a brain would know just to call an invalid freeday and possibly slay the warden for giving invalid orders. You can try to sugarcoat up the obvious favoritism towards warrior (a staff member who rarely gets on the division he's supposed to be monitoring mind you) and the whole situation regarding his freesmiting, but we can all see the deep layers of pure bullshit underneath.
  24. Agree
    Chrono got a reaction from DCook in ItsAaron - Counter-Strike: Source   
    So do the right thing. Give Aaron at minimum his mod back, or make up for his time lost and just give him admin back. I've given 2 prime examples of how unfair his demotion was, and one of them being your "strictly forbidden" example. regardless of whether you were Co then or not, In the case of Aaron, he is being treated unfairly.
     
    None of this "we have to start somewhere so it might as well be here" bullshit. If you got this special treatment, it was probably because you are friends with the div leaders or something, and treating someone who isn't necessarily best friends with them and likes to call it how they see it differently is way too unfair. by "friends" i mean, you sit there and suck their dicks (you too warrior)
  25. Agree
    Chrono got a reaction from DCook in ItsAaron - Counter-Strike: Source   
    Back on the subject of fairness. @@Forest again, you want to go with "STRICTLY FORBIDDEN"? fine. smite @all is STRICTLY FORBIDDEN, yet warrior only got demoted from moderator to admin, and had his banned moved from perm to 1 month to 1 day.
     
    Why does aaron go from Admin to Member? That right there is a prime example of not being fair.
     
    IMO Aaron even did his job MUCH better than Warrior did.