×
  • Sign In
  • Sign In



    Or sign in with one of these services

  • Sign Up
Jump to content

diabeetus

Members
  • D
  • Content Count

    1692
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    30

Reputation Activity

  1. Smelly
    diabeetus reacted to xGShadowSpy in Derpo_o - Garrys Mod   
  2. Agree
    diabeetus got a reaction from Brian in Derpo_o - Garrys Mod   
    And the award for best forum posts of the century goes to (drumroll please): everyone on this thread who posted a shitty gif, in some collective yet incredibly pathetic attempt to convey some form of humor. These are some of the most insightful and thought-provoking posts I've ever seen. I'm glad to see that yet another thread has been quickly derailed in a matter of minutes, Congratulations!
     
    0 as I honestly couldn't care less whether or not he gets unbanned.
  3. Like
    diabeetus reacted to Forest in Derpo_o - Garrys Mod   
    I know this is closed, but honestly, a few of you need to grow the hell up. Regardless of whether this is a troll thread or not, there is no reason you should further escalate the situation by feeding the fire with stupidity. @@BlackWidow since you're new I'll let you off with a warning. 80% of the posts here are done by yourself with unnecessary images that have no relevance to the thread at all. As for the others who did the same thing, I expect much more from senior xG Members.
     
    The next person to spam a thread with pictures that are both irrelevant and intended to either troll/harass will be forum banned for a day unless the thread specifically calls for it. Higher Ups have my permission to Forum Ban Members/Non-Members for this shit if they see it.
  4. Smelly
    diabeetus reacted to GandalfTehGrey in Derpo_o - Garrys Mod   
  5. Ding!
    diabeetus reacted to MineCrack in Derpo_o - Garrys Mod   
    You guys are so cool. Staff posting memes instead of even taking this seriously when he's correctly labeling you children.
  6. Smelly
    diabeetus reacted to GandalfTehGrey in Derpo_o - Garrys Mod   
  7. Smelly
    diabeetus reacted to xGShadowSpy in Derpo_o - Garrys Mod   
  8. Smelly
    diabeetus reacted to GandalfTehGrey in Derpo_o - Garrys Mod   
    Derp just.....
     
    -1 i agree with Genesis, this is dumb, "Furry anime kids?" and then they died? makes no sense at all Derp
  9. Smelly
    diabeetus reacted to GandalfTehGrey in Derpo_o - Garrys Mod   
    to your ratings @@MineCrack
  10. Smelly
    diabeetus reacted to GandalfTehGrey in Derpo_o - Garrys Mod   
    this is to Derp and Mincecrack
  11. Smelly
    diabeetus reacted to Lemons in Derpo_o - Garrys Mod   
    Flame war started in under 5 minutes.
  12. Bad Spelling
    diabeetus reacted to xGShadowSpy in Derpo_o - Garrys Mod   
    -1, I saw u rdming and ur spelling is shit.

  13. Smelly
    diabeetus reacted to GandalfTehGrey in ๖ۣۜandy۞ - Garrys Mod   
    cool
  14. Bad Spelling
    diabeetus reacted to MrAwesome104 in I'M BACK BITCHES!!!!!!!!   
    FFFUUUU. It's no longer peace full here.
  15. Agree
    diabeetus got a reaction from Genesis in Player Trails [Beta Stage as of 10/16/13]   
    Would the fact that people have to donate in order to apply for mod be enough proof to get trail access? Because I (and some other people) donated on the old forums in order to apply for mod and were just wondering if that would be sufficient. @@DarkWolf6052
  16. Agree
    diabeetus got a reaction from Yu_Narukami in Hey.   
    that's going to be pretty hard to do.
    heuhuehehuehuehueuheuhjeuheuheuheuheuehuehuheuehuheuhehuehueh
  17. Agree
    diabeetus got a reaction from Tsuchikure in Hey.   
    that's going to be pretty hard to do.
    heuhuehehuehuehueuheuhjeuheuheuheuheuehuehuheuehuheuhehuehueh
  18. Agree
    diabeetus got a reaction from MrJeeblez in Myth - Counter-Strike: Source   
    -1
    You horribly misrepresented our community and were punished accordingly for doing so. These bans are put in place with the intention of lasting forever, and that's how they should stay in my opinion. No unbanning because the OP wrote some cliche sob story about how he/she realizes about how wrong they were and how they now realize that what they did was wrong, and that all they want is to just be unbanned from servers so they can interact with us once again. You should have known that what you were doing was wrong when the thought of even doing something like that crossed your mind and immediately have decided against it. I really see absolutely no reason to unban you.
  19. Dislike
    diabeetus got a reaction from Tsuchikure in So   
    just when we started to agree on some things...
  20. Agree
    diabeetus got a reaction from MineCrack in Myth - Counter-Strike: Source   
    -1
    You horribly misrepresented our community and were punished accordingly for doing so. These bans are put in place with the intention of lasting forever, and that's how they should stay in my opinion. No unbanning because the OP wrote some cliche sob story about how he/she realizes about how wrong they were and how they now realize that what they did was wrong, and that all they want is to just be unbanned from servers so they can interact with us once again. You should have known that what you were doing was wrong when the thought of even doing something like that crossed your mind and immediately have decided against it. I really see absolutely no reason to unban you.
  21. Ding!
    diabeetus reacted to MineCrack in Hexx - Counter-Strike: Source   
    Why leave just to come back?
  22. Disagree
    diabeetus reacted to xGShadowSpy in Hey Guis, just a quick note...   
    I see no problem as long as he goes back and leaves, he may have forgotten to make a thread or had worked out with a higher up that he was leaving and just didnt make a thread there.
  23. F!$k Off
    diabeetus got a reaction from xGShadowSpy in TurtlesComrade - Counter-Strike: Source   
    requesting close, minimum age is 14 @@DarkWolf6052 @@Rena
  24. Ding!
    diabeetus reacted to xGShadowSpy in @Bleed   
    I say CSS is dying all the time but you dont see me using a fake account
  25. Winner
    diabeetus got a reaction from MineCrack in whitestar - Counter-Strike: Source   
    Didn't we just deny Gustav's ban protest because he intentionally massed? Wasn't it also decided on Eden's last ban protest (in which he was permed from CT for intentionally massing) that all future intentional masses would be denied? I like Whitestar and all, but we need to quit the favortist bullshit when we unban people just because we like them a little better than the last guy who intentionally massed. -1, he intentionally massed on a noballs and should stay permed (I understand that he was egged on to do it, but everyone knows the consequences of massing and he shouldn't have given in), sorry bud. Dura lex sed lex.