×
  • Sign In
  • Sign In



    Or sign in with one of these services

  • Sign Up
Jump to content

John

Members
  • Content Count

    691
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Reputation Activity

  1. Agree
    John got a reaction from TheKingBaby in The Usual   
    Because you like men.
  2. Agree
    John got a reaction from SpermytheCat in The Usual   
    Because you like men.
  3. Smelly
    John reacted to Tsuchikure in The Usual   
    That's on my back? wat? Kinda looks like i'm cuddling it or something.
  4. Smelly
    John got a reaction from Tsuchikure in The Usual   
    Because you like men.
  5. Agree
    John got a reaction from MrSaturday in The Usual   
    Because you like men.
  6. Agree
    John reacted to SpermytheCat in CT-T Marriage Day, make it happen   
    Leave it to you to mow down your own spouse with a submachine gun on your wedding day, you monster.
  7. Agree
    John reacted to Vector in CT bans.   
    Except for me because you don't tell Christ Benoit what to do.
  8. Agree
    John reacted to xGShadowSpy in CT bans.   
    @@Matsi You still have to perm for mass freekill, its been discussed before, if YOU have a problem with that, you should NOT be a mod. We (all the mods) didn't become mods to do whatever we want, if you dont enforce something a way a mod is supposed to, you dont deserve mod.
  9. Agree
    John got a reaction from SpermytheCat in CT bans.   
    In light of recent events. This is for discussion for the CS:S community. I want all of your input.
     
    We currently CT ban permanently for 3 freekills. However, I think permanently banning people who UNINTENTIONALLY mass freekill is a waste of a perfectly good CT. Most of us have made a mistake and been ct banned before. You know how it feels to be CT banned for messing up.
     
    I propose that we change the length of an UNINTENTIONAL mass freekill to 2-3 weeks. This would save us the trouble of having to just unban the people who mess up.
     
    Whether you +/-1, give a reason. Give your opinion. If you think it should work some other way tell me.
  10. Smelly
    John got a reaction from Princess_Celest in GanjaMonster - Counter-Strike: Source   
    +1 3 weeks.
     
    @@Hidingmaster @@Gkoo
  11. F!$k Off
    John got a reaction from orangejuice in GanjaMonster - Counter-Strike: Source   
    +1 3 weeks.
     
    @@Hidingmaster @@Gkoo
  12. Agree
    John reacted to xGShadowSpy in Astera xgm - Counter-Strike: Source   
    -1, it's minor abuse, nothing to warrant any major punishment.
     
    @@Kirigaya_Kazuto For as long as you are mod, you will have people calling you a bad mod(Mostly the people who are just pissed off about being slayed, even if it was valid), eventually you'll have to adapt to it.
    @@Matsi There are varying types of disrespect. There is a thing called "Admin disrespect", meaning they're disrespecting their job as an admin. Though it shouldn't be taken seriously, someone saying "You're a bad mod", or anything of that sort, CAN be considered admin disrespect. If someone called you a shit mod I doubt you wouldn't be defensive about it.
  13. Smelly
    John got a reaction from Tsuchikure in GanjaMonster - Counter-Strike: Source   
    +1 3 weeks.
     
    @@Hidingmaster @@Gkoo
  14. Agree
    John got a reaction from DarkWolf6052 in CT bans.   
    I already only ban people for 1 week when they unintentionally freekill more than 2 people because I'm not stupid and I have that thing called common sense... you should try and get some :)
    Matsi that's called abuse. We have set times we are required to ban them for. That's not exactly common sense. Freekilling 3 t's is a mass freekill and is a permanent CT ban. No less.
    @@Hidingmaster @@DarkWolf6052 @@Gkoo
  15. Smelly
    John got a reaction from Tsuchikure in CT bans.   
    Another one of the reasons why it should remain how it is though. In some situations, it is extremely hard to determine whether or not something was intentional or unintentional. This is why we have Ban Protests, to weed them out. The offending CT can plead their case as to why they did what they did, and then Staff can determine whether or not to reduce the ban or keep it as is.
    Alright then perhaps we could make it a flat 2 week CT ban if proven accidental in their ban protest?
  16. Smelly
    John got a reaction from Tsuchikure in CT bans.   
    I already only ban people for 1 week when they unintentionally freekill more than 2 people because I'm not stupid and I have that thing called common sense... you should try and get some :)
    Matsi that's called abuse. We have set times we are required to ban them for. That's not exactly common sense. Freekilling 3 t's is a mass freekill and is a permanent CT ban. No less.
    @@Hidingmaster @@DarkWolf6052 @@Gkoo
  17. Agree
    John got a reaction from xGShadowSpy in CT bans.   
    Another one of the reasons why it should remain how it is though. In some situations, it is extremely hard to determine whether or not something was intentional or unintentional. This is why we have Ban Protests, to weed them out. The offending CT can plead their case as to why they did what they did, and then Staff can determine whether or not to reduce the ban or keep it as is.
    Alright then perhaps we could make it a flat 2 week CT ban if proven accidental in their ban protest?
  18. Like
    John got a reaction from diabeetus in CT bans.   
    I already only ban people for 1 week when they unintentionally freekill more than 2 people because I'm not stupid and I have that thing called common sense... you should try and get some :)
    Matsi that's called abuse. We have set times we are required to ban them for. That's not exactly common sense. Freekilling 3 t's is a mass freekill and is a permanent CT ban. No less.
    @@Hidingmaster @@DarkWolf6052 @@Gkoo
  19. Like
    John got a reaction from DrLee in CT bans.   
    I already only ban people for 1 week when they unintentionally freekill more than 2 people because I'm not stupid and I have that thing called common sense... you should try and get some :)
    Matsi that's called abuse. We have set times we are required to ban them for. That's not exactly common sense. Freekilling 3 t's is a mass freekill and is a permanent CT ban. No less.
    @@Hidingmaster @@DarkWolf6052 @@Gkoo
  20. Smelly
    John got a reaction from Tsuchikure in CT bans.   
    In light of recent events. This is for discussion for the CS:S community. I want all of your input.
     
    We currently CT ban permanently for 3 freekills. However, I think permanently banning people who UNINTENTIONALLY mass freekill is a waste of a perfectly good CT. Most of us have made a mistake and been ct banned before. You know how it feels to be CT banned for messing up.
     
    I propose that we change the length of an UNINTENTIONAL mass freekill to 2-3 weeks. This would save us the trouble of having to just unban the people who mess up.
     
    Whether you +/-1, give a reason. Give your opinion. If you think it should work some other way tell me.
  21. Agree
    John got a reaction from Leotekk in CT bans.   
    In light of recent events. This is for discussion for the CS:S community. I want all of your input.
     
    We currently CT ban permanently for 3 freekills. However, I think permanently banning people who UNINTENTIONALLY mass freekill is a waste of a perfectly good CT. Most of us have made a mistake and been ct banned before. You know how it feels to be CT banned for messing up.
     
    I propose that we change the length of an UNINTENTIONAL mass freekill to 2-3 weeks. This would save us the trouble of having to just unban the people who mess up.
     
    Whether you +/-1, give a reason. Give your opinion. If you think it should work some other way tell me.
  22. Agree
    John got a reaction from DrLee in CT bans.   
    In light of recent events. This is for discussion for the CS:S community. I want all of your input.
     
    We currently CT ban permanently for 3 freekills. However, I think permanently banning people who UNINTENTIONALLY mass freekill is a waste of a perfectly good CT. Most of us have made a mistake and been ct banned before. You know how it feels to be CT banned for messing up.
     
    I propose that we change the length of an UNINTENTIONAL mass freekill to 2-3 weeks. This would save us the trouble of having to just unban the people who mess up.
     
    Whether you +/-1, give a reason. Give your opinion. If you think it should work some other way tell me.
  23. Agree
    John reacted to Gawd in John - Counter-Strike: Source   
    Not necessarily referring to John as I have no clue what happened.
     
     
    I don't get why we perm ban people for unintentionally killing 3 people, especially for something that they CLEARLY may not have known about such as a map mechanic. At the end of the round, those three t's will get over it and keep playing but we've lost a person that did not mean to harm us and helps to populate the servers.
     
    There are certain cases where it's kind of ambiguous, but in clear unintentional three man freekills, I seriously don't think perms should be dished out and don't know why we continue to do so.
  24. Smelly
    John reacted to Matsi in Astera xgm - Counter-Strike: Source   
    Actually he said "Wow this fucking new mob is bad. Fucking freeslays"
     
    That isn't disrespect.... you're all fucking badmins! Fucking Freegags!
  25. Smelly
    John reacted to Matsi in Astera xgm - Counter-Strike: Source   
    Actually he said "Wow this fucking new mob is bad. Fucking freeslays"
     
    That isn't disrespect.... you're all fucking badmins! Fucking Freegags!
     
    If he found it to be disrespectful which it was, then he can gag. Also, not to mention the fact he started disrespecting more once the round started over voice chat.
     
    But once again, it's better to ask why they killed you rather than just slay them. Unless you are absolutely sure it was a freekill.
     
    If he found it to be "disrespectful" than he fails at being a mod because what halfbaked said is actually listed specifically as something that is NOT DISRESPECT:

     
    As Forest has stated... no shit he was pissed off and continued afterwords when the next round started... he just got freeslayed by a badmod that wasn't paying attention and then invalidly gagged... I would be pissed off too...