ThePenguin 9 Posted September 24, 2014 I'll post more later but for now, there is absolutely no need to be general assholes to each other (I.e. pitiful, other insults etc,.) That isn't a civilized way to communicate nor does it help anyone fix any problems 1 diabeetus reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ThePenguin 9 Posted September 24, 2014 Now that I'm home I can go into detail. This may make some of you think I'm being stupid, but I'm just being rational. Rabid is right in this case. Has rabid trolled before? Sure he has, but that doesn't make everything he does trolling. I, for one, will annoy someone in TS (@Bleed ), but that doesn't mean I will always join TS simply to annoy someone. Sometimes I simply want to hang out and play league, other times I have something in mind to talk about. That is all rabid is doing. He brought up a valid point that we have been completely ignoring, the teamspeak rules. According to the forums, those rules were made over a year ago (but i think it may have been more than that). What does that make them? Outdated. What must been done to solve the issue? Update the rules. Simple as that. How the rules are updated is a separate matter, but that is the best solution I see to this problem. Now that we know rabid is right, that's one problem taken care of. Being right does not give anyone the right to attack someone else in any form, as was seen on the last few threads. That goes to everyone, not just rabid, that includes hiding, that includes warrior, that includes anyone that posts on the forums. There is absolutely NO reason to be at each other's throats. Have a problem with someone in particular? Talk it over in private, don't make it everyone's problem. 1 1 1 kbraszzz, DrLee and Rabid reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rabid 173 Posted September 24, 2014 For anybody that knows me by the way, @ThePenguin if you have read this entire thing,You can tell how much i held back, I tried my hardest to be respectful to this game. 1 Forest reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xGShadowSpy 108 Posted September 24, 2014 I agree with the photos not being allowed. Boss looks over at you during work, and says "Whatcha looking at?" and you answer "Young animated girls in little to no clothing." , his answer isnt gonna be "Oh OK." Either enforce this with the nsfw rule, or make it so that you dont use the term nsfw and say it cant show any nipples, genitalia etc. 2 AegeanOld and xGStumpy reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Forest 309 Posted September 25, 2014 NSFW is Not Safe for Work. What? Oh, I was under the impression that not many people understood the concept of the whole 'NSFW' thing. Not trying to come off as a cheeky cunt like Rabid (;)) but it means exactly that. It doesn't specifically mean nudity, it doesn't specifically mean racism, it means every god damn thing that would come off as inappropriate if seen at your typical workplace, hell, even school in some cases. If this is something that is too vague for anyone to comprehend, then change the rule to something along the lines of: "Avatars/Display Pics must be PG- 13 and contain no sexually suggestive material, racism, or anything else deemed inappropriate by Higher-Ups" just as an example. In other words, elaborate in a way that is so detailed that no one could possibly make the mistake of using something that isn't allowed. Or just keep it the way it is and start warning/banning everyone who has NSFW Avatars/Display pics. Just my 2 cents. 2 xGStumpy and AegeanOld reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AegeanOld 0 Posted September 27, 2014 So can we get a response from @Hidingmaster on how these pictures aren't NSFW and that it's just our opinion? Isn't he CL ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hidingmaster 19 Posted September 27, 2014 So can we get a response from @Hidingmaster on how these pictures aren't NSFW and that it's just our opinion? Isn't he CL ? You do understand I said it's my opinion they are not. Newsflash, there are 4 other CLs that have opinions on it to. We are currently discussing it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AegeanOld 0 Posted September 27, 2014 You do understand I said it's my opinion they are not. Newsflash, there are 4 other CLs that have opinions on it to. We are currently discussing it. You're not gonna justify your opinion on how little girls wearing barely anything is not NSFW? I wanna hear your reasoning behind it as you are CL and your word is law in this community. You can't go against something that is black and white and say "yeah it's just my opinion" and not give any reasoning. What makes you think they are not nsfw? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hidingmaster 19 Posted September 27, 2014 You're not gonna justify your opinion on how little girls wearing barely anything is not NSFW? I wanna hear your reasoning behind it as you are CL and your word is law in this community. You can't go against something that is black and white and say "yeah it's just my opinion" and not give any reasoning. What makes you think they are not nsfw? It's not law. When all CLs come to a conclusion then it is law. That's all I'm saying about it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AegeanOld 0 Posted September 27, 2014 Great, even though you just ignored all of us when we clearly wanted a reasonable answer. You can close thread there's clearly nothing further to discuss. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites