×
  • Sign In
  • Sign In



    Or sign in with one of these services

  • Sign Up
Jump to content

xGShadowSpy

Members
  • Content Count

    2673
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    24

Posts posted by xGShadowSpy


  1. -1... Teamkilling was never allowed and shouldn't be allowed. Once you allow teamkilling, you allow a T killing EVERYONE on a map like parabellum in the freedom pit trap and wardens can put them there on purpose for the other T once it's allowed, and all it's gonna do is piss off the players who just lost their round.

    It might be fun looking at it from the view of the person teamkilling someone, but all it will do is cause problems, people will get pissed if they're constantly teamkilled because we all know once this rule is put in place people will do it all the time.


  2. @@DarkWolf6052 He knows that, he was originally making this thread to remove the rule allowing favoritism until last CT, then he found out it wasn't there. So he made this to inform people its not in the motd, and he's saying favoritism isn't allowed before or after last CT since its not in the motd.


  3. I was here before you turned into a troll (Pc broke and had surgery, was out a few months with the 2 combined), so I dont know the full story of everything you did to troll, but Im all for giving a second chance. But honestly, Towelie you don't have very high chances. +1 For a shorten, definitely not an immediate unban. I don't care if people disagree with me but I still am down for giving another chance. Give him a test run, if he hasn't changed ban him perm, no appeal that time.


  4. I dont know if they edited it into but there was a discussion on this and they came up with the verdict of allowing it til last CT.

    +1 for removing it though, it only causes trouble.


  5. @@Matsi I was the only one of them in the stack. I was right with all the ones dying, in-game I asked "If you saw it, then how many were freekills?" Then NONE of them knew, Ganja even SAID that he didn't know. But now since theres a ban protest they all the sudden know there were freekills.


  6. @@John The only stack he shot into was the stack he killed.

    @@Matsi Don't see how he was being a dick, o.O? Just killing rebels.

     

    @Everyone - If he can't actually get unbanned (I said this in a previous post), it should be shortened to a day(Currently, it's a week). Mainly, because of the fact that the people discussing the ban didn't even know how many Ts were killed, they based it off of "Oh, he COULD have freekilled." He's already been banned for about a day, so change his week ban to a day and its a 2 day ban (Thats only if this were to go through today.)


  7. I don't think it should be allowed. Choosing Race as an LR option shows up in chat to the CTs "<name> has chosen race, watch for where the start and end points are". This technically would initiate LR.

    Until it says "Shadowspy has chosen to do .... with ..." my LR didn't officially start, If you think I shouldnt do it I wont but as of right now theres not actually a rule against it. The rule is against doing an lr with someone then rebelling.

    why does it not surprise me that this would be you doing that...lol

    I'm not the first one who did it, it was brought up after I did it though.


  8. +1

    :afro:

    :afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::llama::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::spam::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro:

  9. This map caused problems in the past. Silence denied another map that had the Cyanide logo on it. Doesn't this map belong to them?

    @@Rhododendron

    It was a good map, but due to it belonging to CN and they caused major problems in the past.

     

    Pretty sure it doesn't belong to them, we have had it on the CSGO server since September and there have been no problems.

    I search up the name of the guy who made it, im not sure if it's BY cyanide(made FOR the clan), but someone in cyanide made it.