bless

The evidence provided is not conclusive enough to make an accurate judgement whether the user is hacking or not. However, I would advice against using those binds in the future, as they will most likely get you in trouble.
 
User has been unbanned.
 
~closed

"You may think people here are dumb but I assure you we know the difference between tracking spies and knowing where a full invis spy is" I mean if you like lying to yourself I guess there is a difference, considering the fact that I i bumped into you and its proven by you flashing on the demo that you tried to use as evidence.

seems to be an overwhelming amount of bandwagoning towards guilty until proven innocent

This is literally just denial if ive ever seen it you clearly flashed after I bumped into you please feel free to watch the end of the second demo once again.

Besides just disproving w/e spooks was on about her not being bumped, bumping into one spy without meaning too does not a hacker make, so far the only thing I can legitimately call even remotely suspect is the final kill on spooks, everything else is me spy checking the contained area with spies that had been continuously respawning and coming back to the same area. I would give you guys the win if I had specifically walked into areas with invis spies and then bumped into them. But there is no such evidence because there was nothing there in the first place besides a batch of people who do not like to lose.

Not at all times and in the demo you can clearly see about 4 or 5ish spies in my general area at once so...

If you had even bothered to cross reference the steamids and steam profile links then youd see that they match up and that the account banned is the same account shown( I honestly dont understand why this is being brought back up)

"suspicious af" yeah? I would like you to specifically point out these suspicious kills and these spy checks that looked so out of place that they confused to the point of calling them fake.

I can only guess that you are upset with me killing you because you held enough of a grudge to not only call cheats, but to then spend the rest of the day defending your reasoning behind my supposed "cheats"

seems to be an overwhelming amount of bandwagoning towards guilty until proven innocent

I find it funny that you think standing behind someone cloaked is a good place to be if you arent looking to be found. I also am going to need some of these sentences edited because theyre very disjointedly put together and are causing some confusion for me namely this "Because if they were walking in front of you so you wouldn't bump them and get you caught" and this "I wasn't either every single time I killed one of the spies instead of going a different class to possibly combat me they continued to respawn run out of spawn and cloak and dagger and wait for me to either bump/hit them." I think youre trying to point out that changing class against a sniper would be a bad idea, but that logic is horribly flawed within itself because there are classes designed to counter sniper. As for the first sentence I think you were trying to say that the spies walking infront of me and me bumping them wouldnt get me caught. Also i too watched the demo so i now know what the spies were doing.

besides admin chat showing that you guys were in fact attempting to "cheater" check me literally one of you dictating to the others on what to do, and the fact that I only got two kills on fully cloaked spies. One was on someone who ran around with a trail that was clearly visible whether or not cloaked, and the second one being on Ghosty who I bumped and then promptly beat to death. The demos continue to prove me right although you keep saying they aren't. The only evidence being brought forth is how obvious it is that im cheating, and the only witnesses are the people accusing me of cheating. Also what sane individual wouldn't push for innocent until proven guilty if they believe they did nothing wrong.

I mean it sounds idiotic when you put it that way yes, but so does denying the fact that playtime and skill level correlate more often then not, and the more someone fights with spies the more they can anticipate a spies actions, with a little bit of lucky timing of course. And you can also not deny the fact that more than 4 people purposefully went spy and then cloaked around me in attempt to get me to find them to fuel the "hackusation"

seems to be an overwhelming amount of bandwagoning towards guilty until proven innocent

This is literally just denial if ive ever seen it you clearly flashed after I bumped into you please feel free to watch the end of the second demo once again.

Besides just disproving w/e spooks was on about her not being bumped, bumping into one spy without meaning too does not a hacker make, so far the only thing I can legitimately call even remotely suspect is the final kill on spooks, everything else is me spy checking the contained area with spies that had been continuously respawning and coming back to the same area. I would give you guys the win if I had specifically walked into areas with invis spies and then bumped into them. But there is no such evidence because there was nothing there in the first place besides a batch of people who do not like to lose.

seems to be an overwhelming amount of bandwagoning towards guilty until proven innocent

seems to be an overwhelming amount of bandwagoning towards guilty until proven innocent

"You may think people here are dumb but I assure you we know the difference between tracking spies and knowing where a full invis spy is" I mean if you like lying to yourself I guess there is a difference, considering the fact that I i bumped into you and its proven by you flashing on the demo that you tried to use as evidence.

same -1

Steam Community :: bless.
I do not like to have a public profile and will be changing it back in 30 minutes.