Vexx 112 Posted July 20, 2017 (edited) I think it's safe to assume @Forest myself and several others think that this ban request should be a closed case seeing as the only real thing going for a perma ban as requested was "hacking on an alt" but there is no undeniable proof that it is the same person (just a fishy account, however I have had friends that have used hacks before and they don't even add their account they only add some close friends.) As for the other matter (The Loli spray) I personally believe regardless of the "discussed amongst higher ups before banning" that it is quite frankly BS, we have long standing statutes of ban lengths for this particular reason. It's very clear here that several staff members have their own personal belief on this matter, and that is why there was a blanket time that is meant to be used. It even says that if you ban above or below the posted time for it, that it is admin abuse. The user in question could very well post an abuse thread and you literally cannot deny it is abuse since that is a decree from rhodo himself. regardless of having "higher up discussion" The user was banned for a month because of combined actions. Me, @virr, @Bello, and @Sesh had agreed that he should be banned for a month because of his conduct. He not only sprayed porn, he was constantly talking about sexual conduct with children, and his name history even shows it. I was the one who pushed for him to be banned for a month. That being said, I don't think extending his ban to a perm is really necessary, he should get another chance to clean up his act. Anyway, @Bello, @Sesh, @mrnutty12, we ready to close this? Edited July 20, 2017 by Guest (see edit history) 3 1 realBelloWaldi, mrnutty12, Reptile and 1 other reacted to this Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vexx 112 Posted July 20, 2017 The user in question will not be punished any further. -Closed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
