×
  • Sign In
  • Sign In



    Or sign in with one of these services

  • Sign Up
Jump to content

orangejuice

Members
  • Content Count

    765
  • Joined

  • Last visited


Reputation Activity

  1. Agree
    orangejuice reacted to kona309 in Minecrack - Counter-Strike: Source   
    -1 on extending the ban for the freekill.
    +1 one for some action being taken due to the trolling ( which is against our community MOTD) That is almost constant whenever MineCrack is around.
  2. Agree
    orangejuice reacted to diabeetus in ItsAaron - Counter-Strike: Source   
    So then why was Aaron demoted while Hellafun wasn't? Aaron had never really had a problem with abusing powers in the past and apparently this instance was the only time at which Aaron could be confirmed to have used !ban @all. Hellafun on the other hand had received a warning as a result of his previous abuse thread (where he used !teamswap to get himself onto CT team even though there was no justifiable reason to do so) and we know he used the !cash @all 30000 command several times in that day alone (courtesy of some fine detective work from Matsi), yet he was once again given just a warning. Why are we only giving warnings to some people while straight up demoting other people who both abused in very similar ways?
  3. Drunk
    orangejuice got a reaction from Tsuchikure in Its been fun...   
    nuh uh hes mine oh and I AM NOT THE WORST NFS PLAYER EVER only 2nd worst... , ill miss you :(
  4. Drunk
    orangejuice got a reaction from Tsuchikure in jubens45 - Counter-Strike: Source   
    -1 you troll a fair amount , almost every other round you are warden u tarp and cause freekills you are active but your attitude is eh so yeah -1
     
    a 8/10
    m 4/10
  5. Drunk
    orangejuice reacted to Tsuchikure in jubens45 - Counter-Strike: Source   
    I think this thread should just be closed on the amount of -1s.
    Here are some things to help you get +1s for the future (Including from me):
    1) Never use your mic again
    2) Stop being immature/annoying (spamming chat/admin chat, etc.)
    3) Stop putting on tags to try to "loophole" yourself into xG or what other people are saying "joining another clan." I honestly don't care about the "in another clan" or "trying to put on xG tags" excuses but it just annoys me.
    I think most vouches were valid, though. Saying "annoying, troll, etc" is a valid enough reason to -1 somebody in my opinion. Just adding "wore xg tags" or "in another clan" doesn't really count those first reasons out, the tag reasons were just invalid, but others were valid.
  6. Drunk
    orangejuice reacted to Tsuchikure in jubens45 - Counter-Strike: Source   
    It should mean then that they do not want him to wear those "fake" tags, then.
    Also most other things were obvious. There's quite a few things wrong with him, and they were all already listed by many people. I don't think we need to say much more for him to "improve on."
  7. Drunk
    orangejuice reacted to Gkoo in Give us back PermBans   
    >>ShadowSpy now entered in the "random" demotion raffle.
  8. Agree
    orangejuice reacted to Kyoko in Give us back PermBans   
    If we don't want PM's perming people then DON'T GIVE THEM ACCESS, If someone got full mod they got it for a reason as @@diabeetus said, either they worked hard for it and did an application or were promoted because higher-ups thought they were ready
  9. Like
    orangejuice got a reaction from xGShadowSpy in [xG] Cookie - Counter-Strike: Source   
    getout.
  10. Like
    orangejuice got a reaction from gloryguy in [xG] Cookie - Counter-Strike: Source   
    getout.
  11. Like
    orangejuice got a reaction from DCook in [xG] Cookie - Counter-Strike: Source   
    +1 knows motd was a great mod would be a great mod again , extreamly friendly
  12. Disagree
    orangejuice reacted to xGShadowSpy in Eden - Counter-Strike: Source   
    I have an idea. If he gets his ban shortened, if he EVER masses again, perm server ban.
    @@Gkoo @@Hidingmaster @@John
  13. Agree
    orangejuice reacted to Forest in Eden - Counter-Strike: Source   
    Because this right here is exactly why Members/Players can mass freekill intentionally and expect to be unbanned. Because of this "unfair" factor. It's maddening; the amount of Players/Members who have been using that excuse to bend a Higher-Up's judgement, and the fact that it actually works.
     
    Your proposal of "setting it in stone" was already set by myself on multiple occasions, yet for reasons unknown, Players/Members are still slipping through the cracks because of rash and blind +1s from our Members/Players. Here are the most recent Ban Protests I have replied to if you really need to see the "set in stone" in action:
     

    (Source: whitestar - Counter-Strike: Source)

    (Source: Morgan_Freeman - Counter-Strike: Source)


     
    What no one seems to get or realize, is that if you people keep living in the past by saying "This guy got off scot-free, why shouldn't this guy" then we aren't going to get anywhere and we might as well remove permanent bans. I don't know how many times I've had to bring up the fact that these are two entirely different situations, and therefore cannot be compared but here I go again:
     
    1. This was an intentional mass freekill, it was done with the intention of breaking rules, and Lapis was completely aware of his actions. It was in no way, accidental.
     
    2. Warrior, on the other hand, did something as he thought it was the right thing to do. He did it with the intention of Enforcing rules which could have been done in a different way, but the intention was to "maintain the peace". He was in no-way smiting everyone because he wanted to nor did he do it with the intention of trolling/screwing everything up. It just so happens that what he did was a terrible idea, but whether or not it was stupid, it is not the same thing.
     
    I don't mean to muck up this thread with this, but seriously; you people gotta draw the line and stop coming up with excuses to allow someone to get unbanned. As much as I love Lapis, he intentionally broke the rules for the sole purpose of doing it, he knew what his actions would warrant, and therefore he should be punished accordingly. Just because someone else is 1-up'ing for the reason that "other people have done it and got away with it" doesn't mean you should automatically agree for the same reason.
     
    TL;DR - Stop comparing a Mass Freekill to the incident with Warrior's "smite@all". I won't say stop being biased as that's almost impossible, but I will suggest to at least try to stop.
     
    @@DarkWolf6052 @@Gkoo @@HighSociety
     
    - Dat guy, Forest
    (Source: LapisLazuli - Counter-Strike: Source)

    (Source: (movetobanprotest) Trinindol)
     
    TL;DR - Just read the top portion. Largest portion of this post involves quotations.
  14. Agree
    orangejuice reacted to xGShadowSpy in CT bans.   
    @@Matsi You still have to perm for mass freekill, its been discussed before, if YOU have a problem with that, you should NOT be a mod. We (all the mods) didn't become mods to do whatever we want, if you dont enforce something a way a mod is supposed to, you dont deserve mod.
  15. F!$k Off
    orangejuice got a reaction from Tsuchikure in GanjaMonster - Counter-Strike: Source   
    +1 for shortning or unbanning i was there it was completely unintentianl but funny as hell lol
  16. F!$k Off
    orangejuice reacted to Tsuchikure in GanjaMonster - Counter-Strike: Source   
    +1 fixed my skins
  17. F!$k Off
    orangejuice reacted to John in GanjaMonster - Counter-Strike: Source   
    +1 3 weeks.
     
    @@Hidingmaster @@Gkoo
  18. Not Funny
    orangejuice got a reaction from GanjaMonster in GanjaMonster - Counter-Strike: Source   
    +1 for shortning or unbanning i was there it was completely unintentianl but funny as hell lol
  19. Like
    orangejuice got a reaction from Lemons in Cya guys   
    @@DarkWolf6052 requesting a close hes not allowed to leave as hes tied up under my bed.... ill miss you if you leave :(
  20. Bad Spelling
    orangejuice got a reaction from iRpx in John Wilks Boothe - Counter-Strike: Source   
    @@Rhododendron can you just ban this little stain please? as hes been harrasing people on ts , saying i hope your parrents die , i hope you start to drown and your parrents dont save you n stuff like that
    <18:39:34> "[Rpx] Rpx": oh
    <18:39:44> "[Rpx] Rpx": i was busy with not getting cancer from you
    <18:39:50> "[Rpx] Rpx": faggot
     
    also nice steam id of the staff member LEL
  21. Disagree
    orangejuice got a reaction from Hidingmaster in !boom   
    my abortion?
    MY ABORTION! oh and +1 on the bombs as it might raise the population if not help keep it up untill we get hub back it might even get more members and more donations rolling in too
     
    oh and johns dumb thats only like a page
  22. Smelly
    orangejuice got a reaction from Hidingmaster in xG Roflmao61 - Counter-Strike: Source   
    +0/-0 for now as there were atleast 2 freekilled as i was one of them i was looking down i saw half of darks spray under me imo it was a valid ban and was disscused between me @@DarkWolf6052 @@John and @@GanjaMonster i personaly would have done it for a day or two but they agreed apon a week so this is just my opion ima leave it as is for now i may or may not change my opion later on
  23. F!$k Off
    orangejuice got a reaction from Hidingmaster in John Wilks Boothe - Counter-Strike: Source   
    -1 you got slayed for camping as i was gunna slay you my self but john beat me to it , then u carryed on about it john gaged u then u went into admin chat then u got kicked boohoo
  24. F!$k Off
    orangejuice reacted to iRpx in John Wilks Boothe - Counter-Strike: Source   
    who was I harassing? I stated my case, and said what ever kid 2 times
  25. Agree
    orangejuice reacted to Shadow1226 in John Wilks Boothe - Counter-Strike: Source   
    still doesn't prove, need screenshots