Forest

Contradiction here, just a heads-up!

Instead of starting a new thread, you could have searched "rebel hunting": Permission to rebel hunt? In case no one is aware, back when I was still a DM this was still an issue and that thread (the one posted above) was in progress. No one ended up saying anything and it was never implemented into the MoTD when suggested that it would be. Directly copy+pasted from that thread: "A CT may Rebel Hunt under a reasonable assumption that a Terrorist has Rebelled or is missing (IE. Head count, hearing vents being broken). Before Rebel Hunting, the CT MUST let the other Guards and Warden know what they will be doing through Public Chat or Team Chat." Hopefully this will be resolved now with yet another thread regarding the same issue. @@DarkWolf6052 @@Gkoo @@HighSociety @@PiNoYPsYcHo - Dat guy, Forest

Attitude has changed since he last tried to apply, which is great. He did a good job as a staff member in the past as well. (Edit)A: 6/10 - Isn't as active as he Could be, but he's active enough on the servers. Should be on TeamSpeak more often however. Activity is below where it should be. (Edit)M: 6/10 - Has improved since the last time I saw him, isn't as arrogant as he used to be but there could still be a touch of improvements here and there in terms of arrogance and respect. Maturity is below where it should be. (Edit)D: Still going to remain at a +/-0, as I think there still could be an improvement in attitude before representing the xG community. - Dat guy, Forest

Welcome to the xG community m8! I'm Forest, Moderator of the Counter-Strike: Source Division. Haven't seen you around (most likely due to my inactivity or the fact that you play on another Division) but I'll keep an eye out for ya and say hello whenever. Hope you enjoy your stay!

You resigned? I thought you were just hell'a inactive.

Congratulations to all of the Promos!

Oh, my bad, didn't realize the "at all times". Read it as "the warden says to look at him. Then the warden says to turn around and face somewhere else." If he said anything along the lines of: "Must be facing Warden at all times" "Must be facing Warden from this point on" "Must be facing Warden unless told otherwise" Etc, then it's technically justified. So long as the warden isn't Tarping Before 5:00 and has mentioned one of the above (or any other variations). Although, with all of that said, I caution any Warden who uses this method as it is highly likely to result in portions of Ts being killed for not doing it as well as doing it (unfair kills). Not to mention it'll most likely lower your likeability on the server. Sorry for the confusion m8

@@ItsAaron

Thanks for the heads up! :D

The Warden has ordered you to turn and face somewhere else, therefore their previous order is null and void. If any T gets killed for doing what the Warden has ordered them to do, then it is a freekill. Remember that if Ts are not following the Warden's orders within a reasonable amount of time, they are delaying and may be killed. Even if it is after 5:00 and tarping is allowed, this doesn't mean freekilling is allowed. Tarping in itself will honestly hurt the CTs more then it will the Ts (end up with CTs being slain for freekilling due to a tarp order). To sum this all up, if the Warden has ordered you to look away from him, then you Must do so, otherwise you are delaying the order, which is a killable offence. TL;DR - If you are killed for looking away when the Warden told you to do so, then it is a freekill. It may be a tarp, but a freekill is a freekill as you were simply doing orders. - Dat guy, Forest

If @autumn would change it back to where we could freely edit our posts, I would be glad to. However at this point I can't edit the Staff Roster at all, which will become a problem as I won't be able to add/remove any Staff Members who are Promoted/Demoted.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tSiqsSHYQQo

Because I forgot to provide one, -1 for reasons stated above.

I'm neither a DM nor a DL. My opinion is that you knew what would happen, you knew the consequences of your actions, yet you proceeded to do so. Warrior believed it was the right thing to do at the time [smite@all], but I honestly disagree with it and do agree that a punishment should be dealt for his actions. You cannot compare an action that was done with the purpose of maintaining order when you did something only to prove a point. Whether others have been unbanned before for the same thing, it does not matter, if we carry this on then we might as well unban anyone who mentions someone else being unbanned. If he Is unbanned when he blatantly knew what he was doing and still did it, do you not think there would be something wrong with the clan leadership then? There has to be a time for the Leadership to put their foot down and say "Enough is enough. If you're naive enough to do something as idiotic as this, knowing the consequences, then you best be ready to accept your punishment." If the Higher-Ups won't then I at least will. - Dat guy, Forest

On behalf of the xG community, I welcome thee! I'm Forest, currently a Moderator for the Counter-Strike: Source Division (mostly our Jailbreak server). If you ever have any questions regarding CS:S, feel free to contact me via Forums/Steam/TeamSpeak! If you're an avid player of our servers, doesn't matter what Division, I suggest applying for Membership in it! Keep in mind that if you do apply, being active on TeamSpeak (just as important as being active ingame) will help familiarize yourself with the community and in most cases will result in you being accepted faster. Hope you enjoy your stay mate! - Dat guy, Forest

Looks pretty awesome, but I do have a discrepancy with the colour scheme, this being that the XenoGamers logo is normally a blue/white or grey.

G'day mate.

Wut. You do realize that you can host a community night whenever you want right? You don't need a position of power to suggest something (although it does help). If you feel like hosting one, go right ahead bro! It's not something that only pertains to a certain individual. If you do go through with it, I strongly suggest letting the DMs of whatever Division you're doing it in, and if you're planning on distributing credits, talk with silence to see if it's alright with him

+1 +1 and +1 again. Speed was one of our more prominent members of xG, always enforcing rules and such as an admin and just generally being a great guy to hang out with. You could always count on him to be on the servers when Staff Members were needed, and even as a member of WD, he still continued to be an avid player in the xG servers and showed leader-like qualities (attempting to resolve problems when they arose between WD and xG). Made an excellent addition to xG back then, and will still make an excellent addition now. A: 8/10 - Almost always see him on CS:S Jailbreak as well as other servers like Minigames or Surf. He's on for extended periods of time (longer then myself) nearly every day. All that is lacking is the activity on our TeamSpeak server, which would only make him that much more in terms of being an xG member. Activity is where it should be. M: ★10/10★ - This guy, always for the people. When I say that, I mean he is literally always pointing out when a rule has been broken both in public chat (to let the player be aware) as well as notifying Staff Members to resolve any issues. Back when he was an xG member he did an amazing job as Admin, and always kept a level head when working with problems. He even took the time to attempt to resolve issues between WD and xG, and that's more then enough for me to give a 10/10. Maturity exceeds where it should be. D: +1 +1 +1 +1 +1 . I can tell that you will be rising through the ranks as you did before (probably passing my current position) already. If not, it'll be just like back then man, both of us Moderators and being the only ones on to moderate and keeping everything locked up tighter then a chinese finger trap. - Dat guy, Forest

Good luck in your future endeavours mate!

Alright, later today I'll do one more test run, this being that CTs may keep their weapons but cannot use them until the expansion time.

It wasn't too disadvantageous to the CTs to the point where them being allowed to use Tasers would heighten their chances of survival (The CTs)?

Has anyone successfully tested this yet? I haven't had the time to do so.

Only vids I got pertaining to xG involved the official xg_parabellum map (trailer and preview). Both were only like, 20 seconds tops. Don't know if it's worth throwing in there. I'm going to start recording shenanigans ingame though, so expect a few vids eventually.

Adding to the whole Warday thing here, I've always wondered how everyone else felt on this (pardon my partially off-topic post): Let's say the map is jb_electric_razor. Warday in Pool. Warden says that Ts may leave their cells at 7:00. A CT stays behind to make sure the Ts are complying with the orders. A T then starts shooting the CT while he is still in his cell, and the CT kills the T for attacking him/her, thereby making them a "rebel". That's the scenario. Has the CT done anything wrong? If yes, Why? If no, Why Not? Also, pertaining to the thread: As Chrono and Aegean stated, if the CT physically saw the T out of their cell before the time given to leave cells, well that's the T's own damn fault. They may still be killed for leaving cells early if they were seen, even if the CT has lousy accuracy and doesn't kill them till after the time they are allowed to leave the cells. Give some of the CTs some slack, it's not like they're breaking rules by making sure Ts aren't leaving cells until they can. Leave the slays for the CT who stays behind and attempts to mow down the Ts due to confusion and lack of knowledge of Wardays.