Regin360 - Team Fortress 2

[Thorax_ 539]

Revoking the Player's mic/chat privileges would have sufficed just as well (for the duration of a round, map, whatever, don't know how TF2 works) and could have been just as effective without being detrimental.

 

I was going to mention that as well but I was busy and distracted at the time.

 

 

 

It’s not like they were spawnkilling again, if it was a second count on spawn killing or any other thing then yes a week would be adequate... doing a week for

speaking their native tongue because they got excited or otherwise enthused over something

is just nuts in my opinion.

 

 

Personally I feel it should be handled like this :

 

Example:

 

Person’s Bans

Ban 1 - Spawnkilling (1 Day)

Ban 2 - English Only (Mute/Gag or if necessary, 1 Day)

Ban 3 - Any Broken Rules (1 week)

and so on...

 

This seems more of a fair and less harsh thing; yes they need to be taught a lesson but for something as minuscule as a tiny bit of foreign language is NOT worth that much time.

 

 

 

And again, not vouching. Just voicing my thoughts.

[Thorax_ 539]

(difficult to say since the previous ban was for simply "Breaking Rules").

They sniped from spawn and spawnkilled.

[Kypari 579]

snip

I'm basing this off of the actual system we're meant to use. I also warned OP that I would ban them for a week the next time they did it but they spoke anyway. People learn better if they're banned rather than gagging/muting. Continuously gagging/muting someone or doing so for a long period of time doesn't necessarily allow people to learn.

[Thorax_ 539]

Continuously

 

 

K

[Kypari 579]

[ATTACH]28047[/ATTACH]

 

K

And that's why I banned them when I did?

[Thorax_ 539]

1 Gag -> 1 Week

[Kypari 579]

1 Gag -> 1 Week

And a kick.

And a previous ban.

[Forest 309]

@Bello @Rejects for their input on this thread as it is a time-sensitive matter that should be resolved sooner rather than later; otherwise, there is no point in the submission of a Ban Protest if by the time it's dealt with the ban-time has already run its course :coffee:

[Forest 309]

@Bello @Rejects for their input on this thread as it is a time-sensitive matter that should be resolved sooner rather than later; otherwise, there is no point in the submission of a Ban Protest if by the time it's dealt with the ban-time has already run its course :coffee:

That is to say, a decision to be made (couldn't edit post, apologies for the spam).

[realBelloWaldi 1245]

I have to agree with what's been said. I still think that a punishment was justified, but a week is too much. With my previous posts I have been assuming the first ban was for the same offence.

I'm fine with unbanning OP today. Also @Kypari.

[Vacindak 195]

I have been assuming the first ban was for the same offence.@Kypari.

 

Actually, his first ban was for sniping from spawn.

 

They sniped from spawn and spawnkilled.

Edited March 23, 2017 by Guest (see edit history)

[realBelloWaldi 1245]

@Vexx @mrnutty12 rejects and i have agreed. its up to you guys

[Kypari 579]

I have to agree with what's been said. I still think that a punishment was justified, but a week is too much. With my previous posts I have been assuming the first ban was for the same offence.

I'm fine with unbanning OP today. Also @Kypari.

I disagree that a week is too much but I'm fine with them being unbanned since I know they've learnt their lesson (y)(y)

[realBelloWaldi 1245]

OP is unbanned.

-closed