-
Content Count
4318 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
64
Reputation Activity
-
-
Rhododendron got a reaction from Cloud in [xG:D] Randy Savage #OrangeSer. - Team Fortress 2
What's up?
-
-
-
Rhododendron reacted to Onward in Goodbye Forever
Please permanently ban me. Most of the admins here are fucking power hungry losers. Also, I guarantee hub will NEVER get fixed. All the money you donate to the server won't make a difference. Fixing a plugin shouldn't take more than a week at most. Silence obviously doesn't care enough about the community to get off lazy his ass and work on it.
As for the people who I have befriended here, thanks for everything . You know who you are. @@Neef @@TheKingBaby @@Sea_Panthers
-
Rhododendron got a reaction from Nymph in DarkWolf6052 xG:F:DM - Counter-Strike: Source
Alright he's not getting demoted. Jacob has shown his incompetence and Darkwolf responded hasty but it's understandable since he is a constant offender. We will be reviewing the admin handbook to put input for constant offenders!
Closed!
-
Rhododendron got a reaction from MineCrack in DarkWolf6052 xG:F:DM - Counter-Strike: Source
Alright he's not getting demoted. Jacob has shown his incompetence and Darkwolf responded hasty but it's understandable since he is a constant offender. We will be reviewing the admin handbook to put input for constant offenders!
Closed!
-
Rhododendron got a reaction from Matsi in DarkWolf6052 xG:F:DM - Counter-Strike: Source
Alright he's not getting demoted. Jacob has shown his incompetence and Darkwolf responded hasty but it's understandable since he is a constant offender. We will be reviewing the admin handbook to put input for constant offenders!
Closed!
-
Rhododendron got a reaction from Lemons in DarkWolf6052 xG:F:DM - Counter-Strike: Source
Alright he's not getting demoted. Jacob has shown his incompetence and Darkwolf responded hasty but it's understandable since he is a constant offender. We will be reviewing the admin handbook to put input for constant offenders!
Closed!
-
-
Rhododendron reacted to DarkWolf6052 in DarkWolf6052 xG:F:DM - Counter-Strike: Source
Do want to point out Silence responded to this thread.
-
Rhododendron got a reaction from Lemons in DarkWolf6052 xG:F:DM - Counter-Strike: Source
That is not english.
-
Rhododendron got a reaction from Lemons in DarkWolf6052 xG:F:DM - Counter-Strike: Source
Alright, although the steps were skipped, I feel that any previous offenders that have offended offensively within the past x amount of time should be exempt from said rules. Someone who spams is put on the radar for most of the staff and when they act up they are punished immediately, and that makes sense to me. If he was doing this to new players constantly, that is an issue, but for someone who has a history of spamming and DarkWolf not dealing with his crap early on, it seems that it's more justified then anything.
Push for change in the handbook for frequent offenders. Then threads like this can die down.
-1 for abuse
-
Rhododendron got a reaction from Princess_Celest in Duckii jr. Petition
!?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
-
Rhododendron got a reaction from RustledJimmies in Duckii jr. Petition
!?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
-
Rhododendron got a reaction from Hidingmaster in DarkWolf6052 xG:F:DM - Counter-Strike: Source
Alright, although the steps were skipped, I feel that any previous offenders that have offended offensively within the past x amount of time should be exempt from said rules. Someone who spams is put on the radar for most of the staff and when they act up they are punished immediately, and that makes sense to me. If he was doing this to new players constantly, that is an issue, but for someone who has a history of spamming and DarkWolf not dealing with his crap early on, it seems that it's more justified then anything.
Push for change in the handbook for frequent offenders. Then threads like this can die down.
-1 for abuse
-
Rhododendron got a reaction from diabeetus in DarkWolf6052 xG:F:DM - Counter-Strike: Source
Alright, although the steps were skipped, I feel that any previous offenders that have offended offensively within the past x amount of time should be exempt from said rules. Someone who spams is put on the radar for most of the staff and when they act up they are punished immediately, and that makes sense to me. If he was doing this to new players constantly, that is an issue, but for someone who has a history of spamming and DarkWolf not dealing with his crap early on, it seems that it's more justified then anything.
Push for change in the handbook for frequent offenders. Then threads like this can die down.
-1 for abuse
-
Rhododendron got a reaction from xGShadowSpy in DarkWolf6052 xG:F:DM - Counter-Strike: Source
Alright, although the steps were skipped, I feel that any previous offenders that have offended offensively within the past x amount of time should be exempt from said rules. Someone who spams is put on the radar for most of the staff and when they act up they are punished immediately, and that makes sense to me. If he was doing this to new players constantly, that is an issue, but for someone who has a history of spamming and DarkWolf not dealing with his crap early on, it seems that it's more justified then anything.
Push for change in the handbook for frequent offenders. Then threads like this can die down.
-1 for abuse
-
Rhododendron got a reaction from DarkWolf6052 in DarkWolf6052 xG:F:DM - Counter-Strike: Source
Alright, although the steps were skipped, I feel that any previous offenders that have offended offensively within the past x amount of time should be exempt from said rules. Someone who spams is put on the radar for most of the staff and when they act up they are punished immediately, and that makes sense to me. If he was doing this to new players constantly, that is an issue, but for someone who has a history of spamming and DarkWolf not dealing with his crap early on, it seems that it's more justified then anything.
Push for change in the handbook for frequent offenders. Then threads like this can die down.
-1 for abuse
-
-
Rhododendron reacted to mtown81 in Quit Smoking Death God
I think we have to worry about his habit of stealing cakes
-
-
-
Rhododendron reacted to TurdWig in Should we remove the ponyspensers?
Isn't it like a choice to have a ponyspenser? You don't need to have one.
-
Rhododendron got a reaction from SuperMaddud in Complaining, rightfully so
I am in no way of understanding how I was micspamming if I was the warden and I am still displeased as the lowering of the ban time still prevents me from playing today unless I am to stay up late tonight.
Was my mic busted? Could I not be heard? Explain to me, as my mic is working perfectly fine on the other servers I was playing on prior to that and right now. And if it was, why not a warning instead of an outright ban?
Status means nothing to me, I want an explanation.
It sounded like Jennifer Lopez decided to stick her mic down her throat and stick her computer speakers near her throat and set it to loud.
You have been unbanned since it was your first offense, however the MIC BROKEN explanation isn't a great explanation. Either fix your mic or stay off the blue team.