×
  • Sign In
  • Sign In



    Or sign in with one of these services

  • Sign Up
Jump to content

Rhododendron

Administrators
  • CL
  • D
  • M
  • Content Count

    4318
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    64

Reputation Activity

  1. Winner
    Rhododendron got a reaction from aZmatic in !boom   
    Go on....
  2. Smelly
    Rhododendron got a reaction from Cloud in [xG:D] Randy Savage #OrangeSer. - Team Fortress 2   
    What's up?
  3. Smelly
    Rhododendron got a reaction from Matsi in There's only one way out...   
    ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
  4. Disagree
    Rhododendron reacted to Chrono in Payday 2   
    yes
  5. Agree
    Rhododendron reacted to Onward in Goodbye Forever   
    Please permanently ban me. Most of the admins here are fucking power hungry losers. Also, I guarantee hub will NEVER get fixed. All the money you donate to the server won't make a difference. Fixing a plugin shouldn't take more than a week at most. Silence obviously doesn't care enough about the community to get off lazy his ass and work on it.
     
    As for the people who I have befriended here, thanks for everything . You know who you are. @@Neef @@TheKingBaby @@Sea_Panthers
  6. Winner
    Rhododendron got a reaction from Nymph in DarkWolf6052 xG:F:DM - Counter-Strike: Source   
    Alright he's not getting demoted. Jacob has shown his incompetence and Darkwolf responded hasty but it's understandable since he is a constant offender. We will be reviewing the admin handbook to put input for constant offenders!
    Closed!
  7. Winner
    Rhododendron got a reaction from MineCrack in DarkWolf6052 xG:F:DM - Counter-Strike: Source   
    Alright he's not getting demoted. Jacob has shown his incompetence and Darkwolf responded hasty but it's understandable since he is a constant offender. We will be reviewing the admin handbook to put input for constant offenders!
    Closed!
  8. Like
    Rhododendron got a reaction from Matsi in DarkWolf6052 xG:F:DM - Counter-Strike: Source   
    Alright he's not getting demoted. Jacob has shown his incompetence and Darkwolf responded hasty but it's understandable since he is a constant offender. We will be reviewing the admin handbook to put input for constant offenders!
    Closed!
  9. Like
    Rhododendron got a reaction from Lemons in DarkWolf6052 xG:F:DM - Counter-Strike: Source   
    Alright he's not getting demoted. Jacob has shown his incompetence and Darkwolf responded hasty but it's understandable since he is a constant offender. We will be reviewing the admin handbook to put input for constant offenders!
    Closed!
  10. Winner
    Rhododendron got a reaction from Peechis_Jr in Not leaving, just stepping down.   
    and hoedowns


  11. Agree
    Rhododendron reacted to DarkWolf6052 in DarkWolf6052 xG:F:DM - Counter-Strike: Source   
    Do want to point out Silence responded to this thread.
     

  12. Agree
    Rhododendron got a reaction from Lemons in DarkWolf6052 xG:F:DM - Counter-Strike: Source   
    That is not english.
  13. Agree
    Rhododendron got a reaction from Lemons in DarkWolf6052 xG:F:DM - Counter-Strike: Source   
    Alright, although the steps were skipped, I feel that any previous offenders that have offended offensively within the past x amount of time should be exempt from said rules. Someone who spams is put on the radar for most of the staff and when they act up they are punished immediately, and that makes sense to me. If he was doing this to new players constantly, that is an issue, but for someone who has a history of spamming and DarkWolf not dealing with his crap early on, it seems that it's more justified then anything.
    Push for change in the handbook for frequent offenders. Then threads like this can die down.
    -1 for abuse
  14. Funny
    Rhododendron got a reaction from Princess_Celest in Duckii jr. Petition   
    !?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!


  15. Funny
    Rhododendron got a reaction from RustledJimmies in Duckii jr. Petition   
    !?!??!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!


  16. Disagree
    Rhododendron got a reaction from Hidingmaster in DarkWolf6052 xG:F:DM - Counter-Strike: Source   
    Alright, although the steps were skipped, I feel that any previous offenders that have offended offensively within the past x amount of time should be exempt from said rules. Someone who spams is put on the radar for most of the staff and when they act up they are punished immediately, and that makes sense to me. If he was doing this to new players constantly, that is an issue, but for someone who has a history of spamming and DarkWolf not dealing with his crap early on, it seems that it's more justified then anything.
    Push for change in the handbook for frequent offenders. Then threads like this can die down.
    -1 for abuse
  17. Disagree
    Rhododendron got a reaction from diabeetus in DarkWolf6052 xG:F:DM - Counter-Strike: Source   
    Alright, although the steps were skipped, I feel that any previous offenders that have offended offensively within the past x amount of time should be exempt from said rules. Someone who spams is put on the radar for most of the staff and when they act up they are punished immediately, and that makes sense to me. If he was doing this to new players constantly, that is an issue, but for someone who has a history of spamming and DarkWolf not dealing with his crap early on, it seems that it's more justified then anything.
    Push for change in the handbook for frequent offenders. Then threads like this can die down.
    -1 for abuse
  18. Disagree
    Rhododendron got a reaction from xGShadowSpy in DarkWolf6052 xG:F:DM - Counter-Strike: Source   
    Alright, although the steps were skipped, I feel that any previous offenders that have offended offensively within the past x amount of time should be exempt from said rules. Someone who spams is put on the radar for most of the staff and when they act up they are punished immediately, and that makes sense to me. If he was doing this to new players constantly, that is an issue, but for someone who has a history of spamming and DarkWolf not dealing with his crap early on, it seems that it's more justified then anything.
    Push for change in the handbook for frequent offenders. Then threads like this can die down.
    -1 for abuse
  19. Like
    Rhododendron got a reaction from DarkWolf6052 in DarkWolf6052 xG:F:DM - Counter-Strike: Source   
    Alright, although the steps were skipped, I feel that any previous offenders that have offended offensively within the past x amount of time should be exempt from said rules. Someone who spams is put on the radar for most of the staff and when they act up they are punished immediately, and that makes sense to me. If he was doing this to new players constantly, that is an issue, but for someone who has a history of spamming and DarkWolf not dealing with his crap early on, it seems that it's more justified then anything.
    Push for change in the handbook for frequent offenders. Then threads like this can die down.
    -1 for abuse
  20. Disagree
    Rhododendron reacted to DeathGod in Quit Smoking Death God   
    -1
  21. Disagree
    Rhododendron reacted to mtown81 in Quit Smoking Death God   
    I think we have to worry about his habit of stealing cakes
  22. Dislike
    Rhododendron reacted to DMTwired in Quit Smoking Death God   
    -1
  23. Dislike
    Rhododendron reacted to Voly in Gone....Again   
    Going on vacation. Gone from 8/11 to 8/14.
  24. Agree
    Rhododendron reacted to TurdWig in Should we remove the ponyspensers?   
    Isn't it like a choice to have a ponyspenser? You don't need to have one.
  25. Like
    Rhododendron got a reaction from SuperMaddud in Complaining, rightfully so   
    I am in no way of understanding how I was micspamming if I was the warden and I am still displeased as the lowering of the ban time still prevents me from playing today unless I am to stay up late tonight.
     
    Was my mic busted? Could I not be heard? Explain to me, as my mic is working perfectly fine on the other servers I was playing on prior to that and right now. And if it was, why not a warning instead of an outright ban?

    Status means nothing to me, I want an explanation.
    It sounded like Jennifer Lopez decided to stick her mic down her throat and stick her computer speakers near her throat and set it to loud.
    You have been unbanned since it was your first offense, however the MIC BROKEN explanation isn't a great explanation. Either fix your mic or stay off the blue team.