×
  • Sign In
  • Sign In



    Or sign in with one of these services

  • Sign Up
Jump to content

xGShadowSpy

Members
  • Content Count

    2673
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    24

Reputation Activity

  1. F!$k Off
    xGShadowSpy got a reaction from orangejuice in Freeshooting.   
    Ok, so lets start with a scenario.
    You're a T, you are following orders and a CT purposely shoots you, is that slayable?
     
    @@John says no
    @@ItsAaron says no
    Yet its intentional freeshooting, and they claim its not in theMOTD, so from now on guise letz n0t slay freekillerz kk guize
  2. Agree
    xGShadowSpy reacted to diabeetus in Freeshooting.   
    DAYUM, I can feel the burn through my monitor! Want some ointment for it John? I love how ShadowSpy brings up a theoretical event, and you guys decide to take something from in-game that happened and start fucking arguing about it. Shadow asked the question: "You're a T, you are following orders and a CT purposely shoots you, is that slayable?". You should not be posting on this god-forsaken thread unless you're going to answer the question he presented. This thread was not made for the purpose of arguing over in-game semantics. Get back on topic, because this thread is spiraling into oblivion pretty quickly.
     
    Now back to the issue hand (@@John huehuehuehuehue). If a CT comes up to you, and you are a T following orders perfectly fine, and proceeds to freeshoot you, it should be a slay-able offense. If someone is going to be that much of an asshat and just shoot you for absolutely no reason because he has the attention span of a 5-year old and gets bored when there isn't constant gunfire and action going on in-game, he clearly should be slayed for not doing his job as a CT. Just because something isn't necessarily in the motd, doesn't mean it's not a rule. For example, freekilling is defined not a single time in the motd at any point, so does that mean that freekilling now mystically isn't a rule and people can freekill? The answer to that is: FUCK NO. Staff isn't just supposed to blindly follow the motd like a bunch of lemmings, but we also have to interpret and determine what the motd contains, and what should be deemed right or wrong based on the motd. Just use some common sense people.
  3. Agree
    xGShadowSpy reacted to Hidingmaster in Freeshooting.   
    Yeah free shooting isn't allowed (you can intentionally shoot someone because you wanted too), but shooting someone who is delaying is fine. I give a lot of warning shots, because I hate to kill the poor defenseless T's.
     
     
    Free shooting: not allowed, ever. Most of the time it is a slayable offense, but it depends on the severity.
     
    I don't really know what the point of this topic was... It's common sense people.
  4. Agree
    xGShadowSpy reacted to MineCrack in Debating permanent bans within CS:S   
    3 Has always been permed, Jihad taught us that as he was taught that.
  5. Friendly
    xGShadowSpy reacted to HaaDron in Hello XenoGamers! Remember me?   
    yes, its me :3 I haven't been playing any video games for a couple months due to school and my computer breaking... However, I just got a new computer and this friday is my last day of school! Expect to see me on the servers soon friends <3
  6. Disagree
    xGShadowSpy reacted to John in New Grenade Rule.   
    @@Warriorsfury Because this way everyone knows. GG fite me. It's really because quite a bit of people were confused about it so I made sure to make it clear to everyone.
     
    Also tired of people saying you bent the rules however you wanted, which you didn't.
  7. Agree
    xGShadowSpy got a reaction from TheKingBaby in CS:S Staff Roster   
    @@Forest My name it white text please Lol
  8. Agree
    xGShadowSpy reacted to diabeetus in Grenades   
    lelxd my naems warrior and I liek to change rulz so i cean remember dem bet4r, and so i nevr hav 2 admit that im wrong evri once an a while, jus like evri othr human being. How about this, let's just change it to how it was before? Was there really any big problem regarding whether or not CT's can fucking thrown flashbangs/smokes/HE grenades? Just use some common sense people, if the CT's are using the grenades at the expense of the T's, slay them (the CT's) for inciting rebellion or hindering T's from completing orders. If a CT is stupid enough to throw an HE grenade and it hurts/kills some T's, then slay/teamban them for freeshooting. Easy as that.
  9. Agree
    xGShadowSpy got a reaction from DCook in laith - Counter-Strike: Source   
    +1, even though half of you might not know how much older of a player he is, hes been playing xG 1 to 2 years already, his old name was Broseph Stalin. Hes a mature player, ran a division, has few bans. Hes a fun person to play with also.
     
    @@Warriorsfury Lets say he DID intentionally do it, without you getting proof of having someone else do it. People have been unbanned from permanent server bans for stuff 10 times worse than this. Yet lets say the person server banned was a friend etc., you would likely +1 them (That is how xG runs nowadays, It thrives off of favoritism, and the most that was done about it ever was removing aegean,even though i do like aegean, he did do that shit). Laith is a good guy, played for awhile, rarely ever broke rules or anything.
  10. Like
    xGShadowSpy reacted to laith in laith - Counter-Strike: Source   
    God bless you man. People like you are the reason why xG is still in existence. Thanks again
  11. Agree
    xGShadowSpy got a reaction from diabeetus in laith - Counter-Strike: Source   
    +1, even though half of you might not know how much older of a player he is, hes been playing xG 1 to 2 years already, his old name was Broseph Stalin. Hes a mature player, ran a division, has few bans. Hes a fun person to play with also.
     
    @@Warriorsfury Lets say he DID intentionally do it, without you getting proof of having someone else do it. People have been unbanned from permanent server bans for stuff 10 times worse than this. Yet lets say the person server banned was a friend etc., you would likely +1 them (That is how xG runs nowadays, It thrives off of favoritism, and the most that was done about it ever was removing aegean,even though i do like aegean, he did do that shit). Laith is a good guy, played for awhile, rarely ever broke rules or anything.
  12. Like
    xGShadowSpy got a reaction from laith in laith - Counter-Strike: Source   
    +1, even though half of you might not know how much older of a player he is, hes been playing xG 1 to 2 years already, his old name was Broseph Stalin. Hes a mature player, ran a division, has few bans. Hes a fun person to play with also.
     
    @@Warriorsfury Lets say he DID intentionally do it, without you getting proof of having someone else do it. People have been unbanned from permanent server bans for stuff 10 times worse than this. Yet lets say the person server banned was a friend etc., you would likely +1 them (That is how xG runs nowadays, It thrives off of favoritism, and the most that was done about it ever was removing aegean,even though i do like aegean, he did do that shit). Laith is a good guy, played for awhile, rarely ever broke rules or anything.
  13. Useful
    xGShadowSpy got a reaction from JustSavage in bye   
    The thing is @@JustSavage, you're freekilling on a server xG knows about, and that is somewhat popular, when other xG Admins and stuff have massed or trolled on a server, its not actually a clan server and its a very small/depopulated one (One server ik xG people like to do this on is that RPG South Park JB shit).
     
    Anyways, see ya, you were fun to have around (Except when u killd me every time i rebelled).
  14. Like
    xGShadowSpy reacted to Enforcer in Late-night JB   
    Or maybe just a password Warrior.
  15. Optimistic
    xGShadowSpy got a reaction from tree in I'm getting sick of stupid people   
    Yeah, i play CS GO now though, and will most likely just go there, in a slow progressing way.
  16. Winner
    xGShadowSpy got a reaction from tree in I'm getting sick of stupid people   
    Yeah, that was pretty dumb, and it wasnt a freekill since there was no time the warday "started", you only have to be on your way in when Ts can leave (without killing them, except in your case he left early, making it fine). I dont think it matters now but, for the hell of it @@John
    On a side note, as you said, yeah cs:s is pretty much a game of a bunch of retarded kids spamming that stuff on JB.
  17. Agree
    xGShadowSpy reacted to Matsi in I'm getting sick of stupid people   
    Where is the rule that says I HAVE to be in warday area at the time given for Ts to leave cells?
     
     
    And no I do know quite a bit about Jailbreak, I have been playing it for over a decade!
     
    I do not like the fact that i am seemingly a target for slayhappy people... No one even asks my side or anything it's just instant slay because someone says you should do it!
  18. Agree
    xGShadowSpy reacted to Matsi in I'm getting sick of stupid people   
    INB4 all you fucking losers give neg rep...
     
    Dumbass in CS:S slays me because I killed a guy for leaving his cell early on warday, so of course I'm like WTF?! and argue the point, THEN he changes the reason I was slayed from "freekilling" to "not being in warday area by 7" so I comment about that and get kicked...
     
    Seriously is CS:S just a bunch of fucking idiots that spam chat "GG NO RE" and "IM SQUIDWARD" or is there anyone that has an IQ higher than -1?
  19. Agree
    xGShadowSpy got a reaction from orangejuice in Harry - Counter-Strike: Source   
    -1, You always use your voice(told not to) didnt today, but its a lie saying you don't. You were causing problems telling people to shut up when all they told you was "Listen to the admins". You were constantly spamming admin chat by continuing to message us after we said it didnt matter, you were still complaining about a FREESHOT 1 round after it happened. I never disrespected you, so if the other admins did then k report them idc. I saw nobody disrespecting you, if they did i was alive.
  20. F!$k Off
    xGShadowSpy got a reaction from Harry in Harry - Counter-Strike: Source   
    -1, You always use your voice(told not to) didnt today, but its a lie saying you don't. You were causing problems telling people to shut up when all they told you was "Listen to the admins". You were constantly spamming admin chat by continuing to message us after we said it didnt matter, you were still complaining about a FREESHOT 1 round after it happened. I never disrespected you, so if the other admins did then k report them idc. I saw nobody disrespecting you, if they did i was alive.
  21. Agree
    xGShadowSpy reacted to MineCrack in Harry - Counter-Strike: Source   
    -1
     
    You are an incompetent, immature child with no self control. You were CONSTANTLY flaming in chat and then randomly called apple a dick. After we proceeded to CALMLY tell you to calm down without disrespect, you said no and continued to flame. Good riddance it should be LONGER than a day, you should be GRATEFUL.
  22. Agree
    xGShadowSpy got a reaction from TheKingBaby in One of the most unenforced rules i've seen on JB.   
    Ts who are rebelling can only be deemed as a rebel if they were seen breaking rules by a CT. This means you can only kill a T you see rebel, not if you were clued to it(Such as their name popping up as killing a CT).
     
    I bolded the main part im focusing on
    Whenever a T gets pardoned, if in the corner(not seen by a CTs eyes) the T kills someone,(as an example since he's bad xG:A ShadowSpy *KNIFE* xG:A Diabeetus), he gets "unpardoned" and counted as a rebel again, so im gonna go ahead and start enforcing it again, and unless its changed(which im not saying i want it to be changed) you should all enforce it too.
     
    BASICALLY: Don't unpardon a T after pardoning him because you saw him kill someone in the top corner text, unless you see him do it with your eyes.
    People should start enforcing it, and not do it yourselves.
  23. Agree
    xGShadowSpy reacted to Forest in Bomb Suggestion (Til hub is back up)   
    I don't see why not, it will only be temporary until hub is back any ways. It would be great to at least have that to keep the players entertained. I'm sick of seeing groups of CTs struttin' their stuff right behind the Ts, actin' all high and mighty :rage:
  24. F!$k Off
    xGShadowSpy got a reaction from DeathGod in Its been fun   
    Kick @all doesn't unarm (as far as im concerned, thats ban @all) and when did this happen?
     
    EDIT: And sorry echo, didnt really want to ban you since you were a cool dude, but kinda had to do it :/
  25. Agree
    xGShadowSpy got a reaction from Leotekk in Its been fun   
    Kick @all doesn't unarm (as far as im concerned, thats ban @all) and when did this happen?
     
    EDIT: And sorry echo, didnt really want to ban you since you were a cool dude, but kinda had to do it :/