-
Content Count
1392 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
31
Reputation Activity
-
Hidingmaster reacted to Gawd in CS:S is dead
Well what can you expect, it is an older game. The fact that CSGO is out doesn't help. But regardless, it will pick up speed during the summer like always.
-
-
Hidingmaster reacted to Chrono in Peppermint - Counter-Strike: Source
We don't want "trying to change" we want "have changed" and it better be showing in game that you have changed.
-
Hidingmaster got a reaction from Leotekk in Peppermint - Counter-Strike: Source
I guarantee that if you get on jailbreak, show that you are both active and respectful, then the community will be much more willing to unban you. There is more than enough evidence to keep you banned, although show us that you truly have changed and we may show some pity after all this time.
-1
-
-
Hidingmaster got a reaction from PolarCoded in PolarCoded - Counter-Strike: Source
Ew.
+1
M:9/10
A:9/10
I guess you kinda play, you know... been a long time player. Is kinda good at stuff, and whatever. In other words, will be a great member.
-
Hidingmaster got a reaction from ItsAaron in THIS IS NOT VENT CAMPING
Wow, y'all don't know the rules. Obviously the 1st picture isn't vent camping because he is crouched. There's a clear difference between the two. Standing = Vent camping / Crouching = NOT vent camping. Its just common sense.
-
Hidingmaster got a reaction from orangejuice in THIS IS NOT VENT CAMPING
Wow, y'all don't know the rules. Obviously the 1st picture isn't vent camping because he is crouched. There's a clear difference between the two. Standing = Vent camping / Crouching = NOT vent camping. Its just common sense.
-
Hidingmaster reacted to GAME4XYZ in Hola and Sorry
Not long ago i post a Ban Protest saying "Unban Me Niggers ! Unban Me Niggers !Unban Me Niggers !Unban Me Niggers !Unban Me Niggers !Unban Me Niggers !Unban Me Niggers !Unban Me Niggers !Unban Me Niggers !" i spam that all over the post and i'm just here for a appoligize. And please! this have nothing to do with WD !!! so please don't blame on them. It all my fall, and hope you guys can forgive me. ONCE AGAIN THERE IS NOTHING TO DO WITH WD !!! IT ALL MY FALL !!! i'm punish from WD and i know "So What ?!?!" but i'm just here being friendly and appoligize.
BTW here's the post: Game - Counter-Strike: Source
-
-
Hidingmaster got a reaction from orangejuice in TheKingBaby - Counter-Strike: Source
In order:
1) http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/867217858784285603/59453972742D76BF5B53E6EC487FA97E1ED769AD/
2) Steam Community :: Screenshot
3) http://cloud-2.steampowered.com/ugc/867216269246549543/EB2A6A8A292DB9FA2842FEB87A8C5BBE75FFE7DF/
4) http://cloud-2.steampowered.com/ugc/867217858784286220/778DF8589E9467A233D7D7F3B171E6E58B141EC5/
Proof of freekills: Discussion between me and John, multiple people mentioning the freekills. I don't know what more you want.. sorry I wasn't recording I guess. And isn't it supposed to be Chuck's responsibility to prove that they weren't, it shouldn't be my job to prove that we are right over and beyond showing a screenshot of the kills and the reasoning behind it....
I guarantee Chuck did not say "together" everyone knows very well that that is never said. Had he said it, there would not have been more than 5 t's in separate lines, most of them would have followed orders. Obviously I can't prove it without a recording, but both memory and logic can pretty much back those up.
I don't see why this is turning into an argument, I think its clear that there was a mistake by Chuck and he deserves a shortened ban due to his long standing escapade with xG. But saying that you said "blah blah blah" and arguing that you did nothing wrong isn't the right way to go about this. If there was an issue with the ban Chuck should have posted within a reasonable amount of time, not a week or more later.
And for all of you who are just +1 ing these because of ASSUMPTIONS.. well that really doesn't solve anything. You need to verify the facts before calling it one way or another. And remember, this is Chuck's responsibility to prove himself right, not mine nor anyone else that was there should have the task of proving him wrong. There are numerous issues with this ban protest on Chuck's side (not submitting mod abuse, not mentioning to anyone that the ban was unjust, he said he didn't care right after the ban, no proof or detailed description of what occured) it all comes together as being just a way to get out of it without admitting the mistake.
-
Hidingmaster got a reaction from orangejuice in TheKingBaby - Counter-Strike: Source
Alright so...
I can't recall the exact situation anymore, but theres a few things that I would like to say.
1) I have 4 screenshots of the killings, a little of the chat that happened prior, chat after, and me and John talking about it. (If its really necessary I can post them)
2) Chuck killed 5 people, which were all deemed as freekills by me, John, as well as the numerous people that were talking about it (one complaint is visible in my screenshots as he used admin chat).
3) It was decided that the situation was a mass freekill, and chuck was perm ct banned.
4)Chuck asked why he was banned, it was explained to him, and he said something along the lines of "I don't care" (Which is really weird for him...)
5) I haven't the slightest clue why you acted like that Chuck, you would have been fine if you would've slain yourself right away for it, or at least appropriately responded to the situation. With that being said, he is one of my most liked players and has never been an issue. I won't +1 or -1 it, I think its a decision that needs to be handled by those in higher positions. Yes it was definitely a mass freekill and a perm was used following guidelines, but the ban should be reduced.
-
Hidingmaster got a reaction from orangejuice in TheKingBaby - Counter-Strike: Source
Steam Community :: Screenshot <-- So there is the one showing the killing.
And @@John do you recall what caused it to happen? I'm thinking it was a warden order that was misinterpreted by Chuck, which led him to killing a bunch of T's that were actually doing it correctly..
-
Hidingmaster got a reaction from orangejuice in TheKingBaby - Counter-Strike: Source
Yes yes that sounds correct, we were trolling and made multiple lines.
-
Hidingmaster got a reaction from Forest in TheKingBaby - Counter-Strike: Source
In order:
1) http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/867217858784285603/59453972742D76BF5B53E6EC487FA97E1ED769AD/
2) Steam Community :: Screenshot
3) http://cloud-2.steampowered.com/ugc/867216269246549543/EB2A6A8A292DB9FA2842FEB87A8C5BBE75FFE7DF/
4) http://cloud-2.steampowered.com/ugc/867217858784286220/778DF8589E9467A233D7D7F3B171E6E58B141EC5/
Proof of freekills: Discussion between me and John, multiple people mentioning the freekills. I don't know what more you want.. sorry I wasn't recording I guess. And isn't it supposed to be Chuck's responsibility to prove that they weren't, it shouldn't be my job to prove that we are right over and beyond showing a screenshot of the kills and the reasoning behind it....
I guarantee Chuck did not say "together" everyone knows very well that that is never said. Had he said it, there would not have been more than 5 t's in separate lines, most of them would have followed orders. Obviously I can't prove it without a recording, but both memory and logic can pretty much back those up.
I don't see why this is turning into an argument, I think its clear that there was a mistake by Chuck and he deserves a shortened ban due to his long standing escapade with xG. But saying that you said "blah blah blah" and arguing that you did nothing wrong isn't the right way to go about this. If there was an issue with the ban Chuck should have posted within a reasonable amount of time, not a week or more later.
And for all of you who are just +1 ing these because of ASSUMPTIONS.. well that really doesn't solve anything. You need to verify the facts before calling it one way or another. And remember, this is Chuck's responsibility to prove himself right, not mine nor anyone else that was there should have the task of proving him wrong. There are numerous issues with this ban protest on Chuck's side (not submitting mod abuse, not mentioning to anyone that the ban was unjust, he said he didn't care right after the ban, no proof or detailed description of what occured) it all comes together as being just a way to get out of it without admitting the mistake.
-
Hidingmaster reacted to House in Sham - Counter-Strike: Source
Lets change our vouches to valid format fags