-
Content Count
1692 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
30
Reputation Activity
-
diabeetus got a reaction from MrJeeblez in Britt
Actually, Dutchy's average connection time per day (for the two weeks before he was accepted) was about 6 hours (the least he played per day was still over an hour, more than a lot of staff for CS:S). Like I -1'd Dutchy's app for lack of activity, I'm going to -1 this app for the same reason. You are a lot of fun to play with, but you simply don't have enough activity to be ready for member. Unless you have several days of activity hidden away on minigames, you've barely played on the CS:S servers. From looking up your steam ID on rank.xenogamers.com you only show up on 4 xG servers, 3 of which you are active on (the last one has 0% activity). Your total play time for these three servers is about 2.5 - 4 hours. While you certainly have the maturity aspect of membership down, you need to get more active before you can get member status. Links to activity: Xeno Gamers - Player Information Xeno Gamers - Player Information Xeno Gamers - Player Information
-
diabeetus reacted to Matsi in Duckii Jr
-1 too lazy to list ALL the reasons...
He evaded bans like 5 dozen times. When he didn't get unbanned from the forums, he went into JB and massed and laughed about it.... and got perm ct banned.
I'm all for him continuing to play here and "maybe" unbanned from the forums, but not for becoming a member... and not being unctbanned.
-
-
-
-
diabeetus reacted to MrJeeblez in Britt
-1I don't know what has gotten into you guy's heads. She hasn't been NEARLY active enough to even be considered for a membership. (ShadowSpy, really? You -1d Dutchy because he'd only been on for two weeks, even though it was nearly every day of those two weeks. Dutchy666 - Counter-strike: Source | Xeno Gamers ) If we combined her playtime under this new account, "Britt <3", and her old one, "L0VE <3", we get a grand total of 8 hours on our CSS servers.
One you've been playing for a while, I'll gladly +1. Unfortunately, for now at least, I can't.
-
-
-
diabeetus reacted to SuperMaddud in Why Do People Care So Much About Ratings On These Forums?
Remember that cheese burger rating? Yeah.
-
-
diabeetus reacted to DeathGod in Why Do People Care So Much About Ratings On These Forums?
420S0Stoned -
diabeetus reacted to OnyxRaptor in Onyxraptor - Counter-strike: Source
Fine Screw it! I will just stop playing on your retarded over-ruled server! I hate Xenogamers!
-
diabeetus reacted to DarkWolf6052 in Onyxraptor - Counter-strike: Source
With that attitude, you won't get unbanned.
Please wait a minimum of 1 month before making a new Ban Protest. This has been denied.
-Dis furfag be closin' ur thread
-
diabeetus got a reaction from DCook in Onyxraptor - Counter-strike: Source
Maybe if you took the time to actually read the rule before hopping on CT, your case would be a little more acceptable. Being new to the server isn't an excuse to break the rules, in fact it shows that you have a blatant disregard for the server rules as you ignored the most and just hopped right on CT.Also, you've been band for less than 48 hours so it is waaaaay too early to even consider unbanning you. If you really want to show you're worthy of being unbanned, play on T for a couple of weeks and figure out if you really want to stick around. If playing on CT is something that you just absolutely need, you're welcome to find another server to play on. -1
-
diabeetus reacted to OnyxRaptor in Onyxraptor - Counter-strike: Source
Well I am 12 so I cannot get 10 dollars or 20,so the Mona Pizza challenge is a nogo.
-
diabeetus reacted to DCook in Matsi Xg:a - Counter-strike: Source
For a mute/gag it tends to be, for example if someone was racist, "!gag whoever" then I would say "No racism please." Same goes for anything else. I mute or gag and right after I state the reason or tell them not to do it. They stay muted/gagged for one round and then I unmute/ungag them. Simple as that.
@@Matsi the mute isn't the warning, it's to get them to stop what they're doing and listen to the admin. You have to warn them/explain why you muted/gagged them.
-
-
-
-
-
-
diabeetus reacted to Forest in Wait So This Is A Real Judgment?
lol, so much bickering over something that is so petty. Instead of dragging this on any longer, why not just compare those in agreeance and those not?
A large portion is for Stumpy's ban time to be reduced, and almost all of their reasoning is logically sound. There's no use arguing it, it's simply ridiculous.
With that said, his attitude and behaviour are questionable, and you all should be aware of it. Check out the Member Protest on him and check the chatlogs I posted there, it's pretty damn bad (for those who are lazy, Click Me). Regardless of it being directed toward Matsi or anyone else, if I was insulted at that rate over something that is my lifestyle, I'd be pretty upset. However, that still doesn't excuse the fact that he was not warned nor gagged or anything before being Server banned for a week.
Both are at fault, and therefore something should be worked out that works for both. Let's start with how that will work shall we?
1. Reduce the ban length to a few days (at the most). He was never warned, gagged, kicked, or even banned for a pre-determined amount of time. No one can deny that, and no one can justify that. With that said, it is as much the Staff Member's fault as it is the player's. If you (Staff) are lenient, and you let someone continue whatever it is they're doing, knowing that it's wrong, you are giving them the impression that it's alright to do it.
2. Post a Ban Request toward the ban if you want it to be extended for whatever reason. This ensures that you can provide evidence and reasoning toward having the ban extended instead of flat out 'jumping the gun' with a straight week ban. If it doesn't go through, the nig is still banned for a few days (at the most) anyways.
3. ???
4. Everyone's happy. Stumpy (hopefully) learns his lesson and tones down on the aggressive behaviour, Matsi (if still upset) had a chance to give his side of the story in a Ban Request (or even a Member Protest) and a decision was later made (or not) reflecting it.
Seems to me that this could all go away with a simple solution, but no one wants to go back on what they've said. Just my 2 cents. You may continue your bickering with this :poop: storm. :coffee:
-
diabeetus reacted to xGShadowSpy in Wait So This Is A Real Judgment?
You act like stumpy is satan himself, holy shit he doesn't troll often. He did the stuff for a day. And you are being a bit hipocritical telling him to go die. And if it's what the victim believes, if you say "Hi" to someone, the person you said "Hi" to can look at that as trolling, your view is flawed, as you can say anything and that person can believe it to be trolling. And let's face it, in so many threads as far as I can remember, you have pretty much sided with DMs and HigherUps. Coinicidence? Possibly, but I doubt all your views are the same.
-
diabeetus reacted to Kyoko in Wait So This Is A Real Judgment?
I'm Kirito. And for fucks sake I've said this or something similar to many god damn times already,IT DOESN'T FUCKING MATTER IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE IT TO BE TROLLING. AS IT MATTER WHAT THE VICTIM BELIEVES IT TO BE. I don't know when you became such a fucking dick but. and you fucker i base everything i say on what i have read and what my damn ideals are.I could care less if you hate furries and him in general. THAT under NO CIRCUMSTANCES should mean you can do that kind of shit though. You need to re-think how you treat people, i used to like you and now your a fucking disgusting motherfucker who really should die.
And for Stumpy's refrence: I am not being biased towords furries or Matsi)
-
diabeetus reacted to PiNoYPsYcHo in I Am Bach! Maybe
No im gnna come back if ima get co-leader. cuz i hurd u guys need one