×
  • Sign In
  • Sign In



    Or sign in with one of these services

  • Sign Up
Jump to content

diabeetus

Members
  • D
  • Content Count

    1692
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    30

Reputation Activity

  1. F!$k Off
    diabeetus reacted to bees in Just an idea about scrimzzzz   
    scrim?
  2. F!$k Off
    diabeetus got a reaction from bees in Hello XenoGamers! Remember me?   
    what's a haa-dron?
  3. F!$k Off
    diabeetus got a reaction from bees in It was great when it was happening   
    adios amigo. Sorry about all the shit you've taken from this clan, I really think you were a good mod and fun to play with. Good luck with whatever you do from here on out.
  4. Agree
    diabeetus reacted to LeToucan in Brian - Team Fortress 2   
    +1 if warrior can mass freesmite and be banned for less than a day why should brian still be banned?
  5. Agree
    diabeetus reacted to xGShadowSpy in New maps/map suggestion thread.   
    Lets remove all the maps and play on that map where you slide around a rectangle that has all the swasticas on it, the one that was accidentally put on the day parabellum was added and we tried admin-switching to it.
     
    Also its only my opinion, but we should remove the maps CTs dont use, and even though this would never go through:
    Lego(FR LR, Simon Says, and Wardays), Summer(Same as Lego), Sand (Only used for ManCannon and Wardays, maybe an occasional minefield) Kittens (Just bad) Iplay (bad) Bunker (Not used) Hellsgamers (NEVER picked ,and boring anyways).
  6. Agree
    diabeetus got a reaction from xGShadowSpy in Where is this rule about wardays?   
    Yes, there is no rule about when CT's have to be in warday area, and you are also correct that any kills that a CT outside of the warday area gets are freekills, and will be punished accordingly. However, if you're a CT, just try to get to warday area by the time given. While CT's don't neccessarily have to be in the warday area exactly at the time given, they have to get there fairly quickly. The motd does say:
    This means that both CT's and T's must be participating in the warday, so any CT's found outside of the warday area who are clearly just goofing off/not participating will be slayed.
    Just to answer the question quickly, yes there is a rule, but no it is not explicitly stated. CT's do not have to be in the warday area at the exact time, however CT's must be actively participating in the warday, so any CT's caught outside the warday area for extended periods of time will be slayed. Unless you were outside of the warday area for a long time, the slay was unjust.
  7. Friendly
    diabeetus got a reaction from MineCrack in MineCrack - Counter-Strike: Source   
    +1. I doubt that there is any risk of MineCrack mass freekilling again. Good CT, obviously knows the rules well, deserves to be unbanned.
  8. Agree
    diabeetus reacted to Matsi in Where is this rule about wardays?   
    So.... I am pretty sure there is no rule that states that CTs HAVE to be in warday areas by ANY given time, only that they cannot kill anyone while not in the warday area.
     
    I am wondering why I have been slayed for getting to the warday area a few seconds late and then called names and told to read the motd, but the motd doesn't say anything about that and I have heard from other admins that the is no such rule.
  9. Agree
    diabeetus reacted to Chrono in Late-night JB   
    why not have it every night like the good ol days of real late night?
  10. Agree
    diabeetus got a reaction from Kyoko in Freeshooting.   
    DAYUM, I can feel the burn through my monitor! Want some ointment for it John? I love how ShadowSpy brings up a theoretical event, and you guys decide to take something from in-game that happened and start fucking arguing about it. Shadow asked the question: "You're a T, you are following orders and a CT purposely shoots you, is that slayable?". You should not be posting on this god-forsaken thread unless you're going to answer the question he presented. This thread was not made for the purpose of arguing over in-game semantics. Get back on topic, because this thread is spiraling into oblivion pretty quickly.
     
    Now back to the issue hand (@@John huehuehuehuehue). If a CT comes up to you, and you are a T following orders perfectly fine, and proceeds to freeshoot you, it should be a slay-able offense. If someone is going to be that much of an asshat and just shoot you for absolutely no reason because he has the attention span of a 5-year old and gets bored when there isn't constant gunfire and action going on in-game, he clearly should be slayed for not doing his job as a CT. Just because something isn't necessarily in the motd, doesn't mean it's not a rule. For example, freekilling is defined not a single time in the motd at any point, so does that mean that freekilling now mystically isn't a rule and people can freekill? The answer to that is: FUCK NO. Staff isn't just supposed to blindly follow the motd like a bunch of lemmings, but we also have to interpret and determine what the motd contains, and what should be deemed right or wrong based on the motd. Just use some common sense people.
  11. Agree
    diabeetus reacted to Forest in Freeshooting.   
    Not every single little detail needs to be put into the MoTD Rules, a lot of the rules we abide by are implied and have been passed down generation by generation by the Wise Ones. Free shooting being one of them. If a CT is intentionally and blatantly free shooting any Terrorist for no reason at all, then yes, I would say it warrants a slay (something like this isn't needed in the MoTD as it is implied). Unless, of course, you're like me, and you enjoy the pain of being free shot by certain people :woot:
  12. Not Funny
    diabeetus got a reaction from DCook in John - Counter-Strike: Source   
    MIGHT AS WELL! IT'S FUCKING 'MIGHT AS WELL'!!!!!!!1111oneoneone Jessus crust you people drive me crazy when I see 'mind as well'. 'mind as well' is not a saying, because IT'S FUCKING 'MIGHT AS WELL' SDAFKLSJADFJLKSDJFJAFJLSDFLA ALL-CAPS RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGGGEEEEE!
    /endrant
  13. Agree
    diabeetus got a reaction from DCook in John - Counter-Strike: Source   
    -1. While I like Echo it's too soon. Unbanning him now would essentially be allowing someone to free-smite @all with only receiving around a week ban (I think it isn't quite a week yet though). I'm pretty sure that even with Mythic he wasn't unbanned for a while after he smited @all, and he only was unbanned because he used the autistic "get-out-of-jail-free-card", which in my opinion shouldn't be given as a choice to people who hack or do something like this. People have been unbanned for worse, but not this soon from what I've seen personally. Maybe in a few weeks I'd +1, but it's simply too early.
  14. Agree
    diabeetus got a reaction from xGShadowSpy in Freeshooting.   
    DAYUM, I can feel the burn through my monitor! Want some ointment for it John? I love how ShadowSpy brings up a theoretical event, and you guys decide to take something from in-game that happened and start fucking arguing about it. Shadow asked the question: "You're a T, you are following orders and a CT purposely shoots you, is that slayable?". You should not be posting on this god-forsaken thread unless you're going to answer the question he presented. This thread was not made for the purpose of arguing over in-game semantics. Get back on topic, because this thread is spiraling into oblivion pretty quickly.
     
    Now back to the issue hand (@@John huehuehuehuehue). If a CT comes up to you, and you are a T following orders perfectly fine, and proceeds to freeshoot you, it should be a slay-able offense. If someone is going to be that much of an asshat and just shoot you for absolutely no reason because he has the attention span of a 5-year old and gets bored when there isn't constant gunfire and action going on in-game, he clearly should be slayed for not doing his job as a CT. Just because something isn't necessarily in the motd, doesn't mean it's not a rule. For example, freekilling is defined not a single time in the motd at any point, so does that mean that freekilling now mystically isn't a rule and people can freekill? The answer to that is: FUCK NO. Staff isn't just supposed to blindly follow the motd like a bunch of lemmings, but we also have to interpret and determine what the motd contains, and what should be deemed right or wrong based on the motd. Just use some common sense people.
  15. Agree
    diabeetus got a reaction from Hidingmaster in Freeshooting.   
    DAYUM, I can feel the burn through my monitor! Want some ointment for it John? I love how ShadowSpy brings up a theoretical event, and you guys decide to take something from in-game that happened and start fucking arguing about it. Shadow asked the question: "You're a T, you are following orders and a CT purposely shoots you, is that slayable?". You should not be posting on this god-forsaken thread unless you're going to answer the question he presented. This thread was not made for the purpose of arguing over in-game semantics. Get back on topic, because this thread is spiraling into oblivion pretty quickly.
     
    Now back to the issue hand (@@John huehuehuehuehue). If a CT comes up to you, and you are a T following orders perfectly fine, and proceeds to freeshoot you, it should be a slay-able offense. If someone is going to be that much of an asshat and just shoot you for absolutely no reason because he has the attention span of a 5-year old and gets bored when there isn't constant gunfire and action going on in-game, he clearly should be slayed for not doing his job as a CT. Just because something isn't necessarily in the motd, doesn't mean it's not a rule. For example, freekilling is defined not a single time in the motd at any point, so does that mean that freekilling now mystically isn't a rule and people can freekill? The answer to that is: FUCK NO. Staff isn't just supposed to blindly follow the motd like a bunch of lemmings, but we also have to interpret and determine what the motd contains, and what should be deemed right or wrong based on the motd. Just use some common sense people.
  16. Agree
    diabeetus reacted to Hidingmaster in Halfbaked - Counter-Strike: Source   
    You applied last Friday...
     
    Close this please.
  17. F!$k Off
    diabeetus got a reaction from Ebic in Hello XenoGamers! Remember me?   
    what's a haa-dron?
  18. Agree
    diabeetus got a reaction from John in John - Counter-Strike: Source   
  19. Agree
    diabeetus got a reaction from DeathGod in New Grenade Rule.   
    Exactly. What is so different about this "new" rule. It looks exactly the same as how it used to be.
  20. Bad Spelling
    diabeetus reacted to Warriorsfury in John - Counter-Strike: Source   
    mind as well fix my spelling!
  21. Like
    diabeetus reacted to SonicRainbow in New Grenade Rule.   
    wasnt this the rule?
  22. Bad Spelling
    diabeetus reacted to Warriorsfury in John - Counter-Strike: Source   
    Mind as well do it myself!
  23. Smelly
    diabeetus reacted to orangejuice in John - Counter-Strike: Source   
    +1 great guy to play with i know what he did was wrong but we unbanned people for worse.... JUST SAYIN
  24. Like
    diabeetus got a reaction from laith in John - Counter-Strike: Source   
    -1. While I like Echo it's too soon. Unbanning him now would essentially be allowing someone to free-smite @all with only receiving around a week ban (I think it isn't quite a week yet though). I'm pretty sure that even with Mythic he wasn't unbanned for a while after he smited @all, and he only was unbanned because he used the autistic "get-out-of-jail-free-card", which in my opinion shouldn't be given as a choice to people who hack or do something like this. People have been unbanned for worse, but not this soon from what I've seen personally. Maybe in a few weeks I'd +1, but it's simply too early.
  25. Agree
    diabeetus got a reaction from Pepper in Late-night JB   
    If we want to go on only when the server is empty, then we should be bumping the time back a lot. Like Jordo said, the server is populated sometimes from 10 PM and even later. Also we have to realize as more and more kids are getting out of school, more people are going to be able to stay up much later as there's no pressure from homework. Not only that but in other timezones it's not actually going to be 11 PM (ex: if players on the West Coast hopped on at 11 PM EST, it would be around 8 PM PST), so we can't just count on the time alone to get the server completely empty. The only way I see that happening is by moving the time back to like 1 AM EST, but some people may be too tired to play at that point. Either we put a password on (but make sure everyone who has access to forums can find the password [i.e. making a thread explaining when/what late night jailbreak is with the password on the thread]) or we risk having randoms coming on who have no idea what's happening and will most likely be put off by the abuse/racism/rulebreaking going on (which could possibly result in un-warranted ban requests and abuse reports).