[xg:m]vexx - Team Fortress 2

[Maso 0]

Division:

Team Fortress 2

Staff Name:

[xG:M]Vexx

Staff's Steam ID:

U:1:66145478

Evidence:

I did not take screenshots, but I was kicked from "[xG] Trade Gaming History" for my spray.

 

Vexx warned me not to use the attached image named "myspray.jpg". I asked him why and to paraphrases, he said it was sexual and therefore inappropriate. I then showed him the attached image named "notmyspray.jpg" and to paraphrase, he said it was fine to spray on the server (in fact a well known member on the server sprays "notmyspray.jpg" all the time and Vexx allows it). Vexx and I have a bit of bad history and I believe that he is intentionally abusing me.

 

"notmyspray.jpg" is clearly not appropriate by his own standards because of the seducing nature of the spray and the clear outline of a vagina (camel toe). While "myspray.jpg" seducing in nature, there are no vagina outlines nor nipples (nudity).

 

As further proof of his abuse towards me, I told him that I would remove the panties from "myspray.jpg" and to paraphrase, he told me that it would still be inappropriate.

 

Everything I have said can be verified by Vexx. I simply want his double standard toward me to end.

[Maso 0]

My in-game alias is "Derpyro"

[Vexx 112]

Since you went ahead and basically posted the evidence I'd have posted, I'll leave it up to the others to decide if it was abuse or not. I don't have anything against you derpyro, I got the opinions of multiple people before I decided to remove your spray and ask that you do not spray it again. You got kicked because you simply didn't listen to me.

[Forest 309]

10. All sprays and avatars must be PG- 13 and cannot have nudity in them.

This is taken straight from our General Server and Community Rules Guide (which can be found here).

 

First and foremost, if Staff are actually enforcing this rule (which I find hard to believe to begin with) then both of those sprays are inappropriate. That being said, if Staff are merely enforcing the latter (in that sprays must not contain any nudity) then both of those sprays are acceptable.

 

Staff should not be demonstrating any sort of bias behaviour toward sprays that they personally think is inappropriate if they are only strictly enforcing one aspect of that particular rule. Either you deal with any/all sprays that fall under the category of being PG- 13 and displaying nudity, or you treat every spray (without nudity) in the same way.

 

To be perfectly honest, if there's a fine line that makes it so difficult for Staff to determine whether a spray is PG- 13 or not (which shouldn't be the case as it should be blatantly obvious) then the rules should be altered along the lines of the following [for example]: "All sprays and avatars must be PG- 13 and cannot have nudity in them. This includes any spray that depicts sexual content, derogatory content, or anything else that may be deemed inappropriate by Staff."

 

With that in mind, I'll re-iterate that Staff must punish any other players with similar sprays if they are punishing players at all under the aforementioned rule.

[Vector 138]

[Maso 0]

So are those spray acceptable (by your standards) or not Vexx?

[Vexx 112]

So are those spray acceptable (by your standards) or not Vexx?

Sure, I guess I was a bit biased when making a decision on whether the sprays were acceptable or not, and the people I asked were probably biased with it as well, I'll own up to the mistake. Sorry for kicking you Derpyro. I'll be sure to make sure neither are allowed by my "standards" in the future.

[Maso 0]

Thank you, all I want is equality.

[SnowyMinion 297]

This is taken straight from our General Server and Community Rules Guide (which can be found here).

 

First and foremost, if Staff are actually enforcing this rule (which I find hard to believe to begin with) then both of those sprays are inappropriate. That being said, if Staff are merely enforcing the latter (in that sprays must not contain any nudity) then both of those sprays are acceptable.

 

Staff should not be demonstrating any sort of bias behaviour toward sprays that they personally think is inappropriate if they are only strictly enforcing one aspect of that particular rule. Either you deal with any/all sprays that fall under the category of being PG- 13 and displaying nudity, or you treat every spray (without nudity) in the same way.

 

To be perfectly honest, if there's a fine line that makes it so difficult for Staff to determine whether a spray is PG- 13 or not (which shouldn't be the case as it should be blatantly obvious) then the rules should be altered along the lines of the following [for example]: "All sprays and avatars must be PG- 13 and cannot have nudity in them. This includes any spray that depicts sexual content, derogatory content, or anything else that may be deemed inappropriate by Staff."

 

With that in mind, I'll re-iterate that Staff must punish any other players with similar sprays if they are punishing players at all under the aforementioned rule.

This is taken straight from our General Server and Community Rules Guide (which can be found here).

 

First and foremost, if Staff are actually enforcing this rule (which I find hard to believe to begin with) then both of those sprays are inappropriate. That being said, if Staff are merely enforcing the latter (in that sprays must not contain any nudity) then both of those sprays are acceptable.

 

Staff should not be demonstrating any sort of bias behaviour toward sprays that they personally think is inappropriate if they are only strictly enforcing one aspect of that particular rule. Either you deal with any/all sprays that fall under the category of being PG- 13 and displaying nudity, or you treat every spray (without nudity) in the same way.

 

To be perfectly honest, if there's a fine line that makes it so difficult for Staff to determine whether a spray is PG- 13 or not (which shouldn't be the case as it should be blatantly obvious) then the rules should be altered along the lines of the following [for example]: "All sprays and avatars must be PG- 13 and cannot have nudity in them. This includes any spray that depicts sexual content, derogatory content, or anything else that may be deemed inappropriate by Staff."

 

With that in mind, I'll re-iterate that Staff must punish any other players with similar sprays if they are punishing players at all under the aforementioned rule.

 

To add on, the reason why the people in which Vexx asked for their opinions DISLIKED Derpyro's spray might simply be caused by the characters of the spray (furries/ponies) and not because of the inappropriate image/content

[Bone 364]

This is taken straight from our General Server and Community Rules Guide (which can be found here).

 

First and foremost, if Staff are actually enforcing this rule (which I find hard to believe to begin with) then both of those sprays are inappropriate. That being said, if Staff are merely enforcing the latter (in that sprays must not contain any nudity) then both of those sprays are acceptable.

 

Staff should not be demonstrating any sort of bias behaviour toward sprays that they personally think is inappropriate if they are only strictly enforcing one aspect of that particular rule. Either you deal with any/all sprays that fall under the category of being PG- 13 and displaying nudity, or you treat every spray (without nudity) in the same way.

 

To be perfectly honest, if there's a fine line that makes it so difficult for Staff to determine whether a spray is PG- 13 or not (which shouldn't be the case as it should be blatantly obvious) then the rules should be altered along the lines of the following [for example]: "All sprays and avatars must be PG- 13 and cannot have nudity in them. This includes any spray that depicts sexual content, derogatory content, or anything else that may be deemed inappropriate by Staff."

 

With that in mind, I'll re-iterate that Staff must punish any other players with similar sprays if they are punishing players at all under the aforementioned rule.

 

I've always enforced the spray rule. In fact, I just punished a guy on surf who continuously sprayed a heavily pornographic spray after being told to change it/not spray it.

Honestly I feel like it's because it's ponies, not just suggestive, that people had more of a reaction to it. I've seen sprays where Mods/Admins are OK with because it's Tracer from Overwatch, but if it were a FnaF character then everybody would go nuts.

Either way, both shoulda been removed if Vexx deemed one to be inappropriate when the other was similar

[xGShadowSpy 108]

I feel like if the spray is going to drive people away, even if it is PG-13, it shouldnt be allowed(Maybe talk to the person who sprayed it if enough people complain about it). Granted, alot of someone not liking a spray is based on personal opinion, but as anyone on the internet knows, MLP is heavily criticized by most people online(so spraying something of the sort is basically baiting a reaction. Doesnt mean they cant spray it, but they should expect these reactions). If i joined a server and saw two ponies wearing panties and spreading there legs, i wouldnt wanna see that shi.t. Granted csgo doesnt have sprays(soon^tm), in css id have to deal with tons of inappropriate or offensive sprays, swastikas, spinning d.icks, you name it. im sure the tf2 staff is dealing with the same.

 

I might be from cs but since this is more of a relatable rule that ive had experience with, i feel it was handled properly, minus the slight bias that was owned up to. The spray is borderline inappropriate, leaving it up to the individual to decide if its inappropriate or not -1 for any punishment.

[Maso 0]

Ok, if there's going to be talk of an actual punishment, I have to make another statement. To be fair, Vexx technically had the right to kick me. As he stated, I ignored his warning and sprayed it anyway. I ignored him because I thought his decision was bias towards me, but that doesn't give me the right to ignore a staff member. Vexx apologized, and I will also apologize for ignoring a staff member. I'm Sorry for spraying my inappropriate spray and ignoring your warnings Vexx <3.

 

In response to ShadowSpy saying, "If i joined a server and saw two ponies wearing panties and spreading there legs, I wouldn't wanna see that shit.", I'm sure that there are plenty homosexual males and straight females that wouldn't want to see a female character suggestively bent over, showing her camel toe. I personally think the statue of David (Michelangelo) is an absolutely disgusting piece of art, but I respect others opinions for branding it as art.

[Warriorsfury 12]

I really... really miss 2014...

[Egossi 1017]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVp3pGLRWkI

[Vector 138]

but that doesn't give me the right to ignore a staff member.

It also doesn't give you the right to disrespect and threaten a staff member. If you're gonna make an abuse thread go ahead and do it. Don't use it as a threat.

I personally think the statue of David (Michelangelo) is an absolutely disgusting piece of art

I am so done with this thread. it was nice knowing you all.