Aegean

Can you explain what this is about? Regardless, it was great to have you here, best of luck with whatever you do and you're always welcome back if you do decide to return.

I want to know: What mode would you prefer How many player slots do you THINK we'll need Would you play it (Why/Why not) Any other thoughts or comments I found a few providers so I could pay at least for a trial phase in June, and continue paying for it if it does bring in people or if there is enough interest. If you're also interested in running or helping with it (either/or) you can DM me on discord. ~Happy Gaming

@Sojodak Thanks for the meaningful post! I'll send you a message soon if we proceed further. @Rhododendron and @virr if you have any opinions or we can talk in private. I don't mind funding it either depending on how setup for custom servers work.

@Lithium Thoughts?

I don't know how often this happens, but I've only seen 5 negevs twice in 10 mans recently by a team when their side is completely stomping and those rounds were lost by the team who bought them. Cheese or annoying strats are also not unique to those guns, I personally hate playing against 5 T's who all buy P90's (or people who only buy P90's) and jump around like monkeys, but there's not really a solution for that. The level of our players are too diverse, if you want more "serious games" which seems to be the vibe you're giving off, you might want to only play when all the fairly high-skill players all want to play, which is almost never at the same time. If you have a realistic solution that you think would benefit the server instead of calling people who enjoy playing with Mudkip "sheep" because they follow his unorthodox playstyle since he's good enough to pull it off, feel free to suggest some.

All 3 are completely different accounts with IP's all over the place, they could just be his friends from the server he asked to vouch for him. Regardless, member vouches are what we care mostly about and he is getting positive vouches so no red flags currently.

If these weapons were broken, they would be abused in competitive as well, but they aren't. This is just from people not being used to playing it, I agree with Virr to wait a month or 2 before asking for changes so quickly. We are legit playing scrims with competitive settings, if those guns aren't broken in comp, why would they be overpowered for scrims? It's ridiculous to even ask to ban items that are IN the game and balanced around the game, the only time I would find it valid is when the R8 first came out because that truly was gamebreaking. Rabid also is not a good example, he is a good player but he also tilts easily from people playing stupidly, and it gets amplified when he doesn't like what he's playing against. Before these guns were unbanned, I always blamed him that he was the one who got them banned in the first place because I knew how he would react if they got unbanned.

Rabid always complains about things in games, he hates any map in CS:GO with 3 lanes, we aren't gonna start banning those too lol

-1 The skill disparity in CS:GO is huge, which is why people like Klure, Mudkip, Steven etc can 40 bomb or more occasionally. They don't become OP with the guns that were previously unrestricted, and the same thing would happen if you put a rifle into their hands. It's not less fun to die to a negev compared to dying to a one tap from an AK. Shit players like myself don't magically become good with the weapons, and I hate this mentality where people complain that we are playing 10 mans with settings similar to competitive.

If we want to include more people for CN, I would say to remove the Shoe rules, but we can provide incentives to the winners.

Welcome to the community!

Gonna object your comment @Chrono, just because someone else was warned does not mean @LemonVolt does not deserve a warning, especially if he was not there for the warning issued onto Red himself. On top of this, this is one of the few ban protests where I truly feel he understood the ramifications of his objects, and does find what he himself did was stupid. I'm gonna go ahead and unban, he was already punished for a few weeks, he knows not to do it again, as is the point of our non-perm bans. ~Closed

Hey everyone, as recommended by Phoenix I wanted to get the community's opinion on having a Mordhau server. Do you play it, what are your thoughts on it, would you like an xG server? Thanks everyone!

Gonna leave this up till tomorrow, if there's no issues with other higher-ups I'm going to unban him.

It was a shitty thing to do @LemonVolt, but I will +1 as you only had one offence and it has been close to 3 weeks. I know @virr had to basically give up on being spoiler-free for one of the most anticipated movies of all time just to take care of people ruining it for others, and regardless if he cared or not, it still sucks he was in such a situation. Overall to everyone, don't spoil stuff on purpose, if you feel like you need to discuss something on discord that is a spoiler, just put || on both sides of a message and label the message beforehand so people don't get spoiled. This is an example spoiler on discord: || Harry is in fact a Wizard ||

@Chrono was the one who banned you. The previous case also shouldn't relate in the sense that Red apparently spoiled twice which is why his was extended. Gonna remain open for other opinions.

MY BOY How ya beeen

I was originally gonna unban you and give you a warning until I realized you did it twice, and for a movie as big as endgame, that's really unfortunate for people you might have actually spoiled it for. I don't think keeping you "permed" is the right option, but we will most likely keep you banned a little longer at least, so you and other people can think twice about ruining the experiences of others just for "memes". +1 for unban, -1 for it being today.

It's less than a month since it was last posted on, it's fiiiiiine

Good for you for getting on a set schedule! After a while it'll start to become a habit and as things improve, you won't really want to go back to your old ways. Good luck!

Been in a few 10 mans with him lately and I had 0 problems with him. +1

So you're suggesting like the first Tuesday of every month guaranteed aside from the very first day of every month. Virr made up a test schedule and for all of 2019 at least the news will never collide with promo/demo in the sense that they will both be on the first day of the month. That's still a good point to consider, thanks.

TwoTwoZero on Runescape when I was 8 years old, RoyalAegean or Royal**** *whatever the class was i.e. RoyalMage* on WoW KingAegean on Xbox 360 and most games now.

We wanted to know everyone's opinion as Virr and I are split on the decision regarding what time news posts should be. I personally thought the first day of every month is much easier to track, and that way I can theme the monthly newsletter as the month they are being posted on. I do not want to post an October event on September etc. I also do not want the monthly news post potentially changing between being in the beginning, middle, or end of the month. Virr's opinion is to have it every 4 weeks, that way it doesn't collide on the same week as Promo-Demo, gives you something to look forward towards every 4th week as people are hyped biweekly from promo/demo, and gives us only 1 week of no content in a 4 week span. Thanks for leaving your opinions!

@thefalconHoly shit how's it going man?