MinerTeddy

I'd like to remind people not to resort to petty insulting and flaming or it's just going to make a bigger mess of things.
 
Try to keep it civil please.

I don't need to, Minecrack. It's procedure regardless of the rules they broken.
Also there's no need for comments like that.

@Kypari
 

 
So did you even look at the ban reasons? Spoiler you didn't, you are a moron.

+1, too long of a ban.
 
I agree with Aegean, so I don't think is much for me to say.

I'm gonna have to genuinely agree with this, like i stated in the private discord that some people reading this are on, i find it extremely unreasonable to not peruse warning a person when you know they may have not heard/seen it, it's essentially being banhappy and is poor staff behavior.
 
Once there was a random guy who got on jailbreak and was mad about how worse he thought the jailbreak community had generally gotten. So he got on blue and mass freekilled, I warned him and everything then he asked me if i was an admin which i was at the time, and he was clearly waiting to be banned, but instead i started talking to him to ask why he was mad and he explained and i explained to him where he was right and where he was wrong.
After the conversation ended he made a geniune apology and said i could ban him since he wasnt planning to join again.
 
And that i think is how staff should try to handle situations rather than going "LOL he fucked up this time /ban @person 0 "toxicity, disrespect" cause otherwise you're being more counter-productive to the server generally than you are being productive.
 
just for the simple fact that the communication in general with brian was poorly established, i will +1 this thread for either the duration of the ban being reduced to a reasonable amount, or it being removed entirely
 
 
TL;DR - The situation was poorly handled, the length of the ban is unreasonably long

I honestly think banning him for having a name like that is a bit excessive. Sometimes people would rather be playing the game than be reading the chat so maybe he didn't see the warnings and had to be given a warning on the voice chat. Even if his ban was from 2 years ago I believe he doesn't deserve a month ban over a name. And about the situation where he was asking you guys to mute the kid, I'm just going to guess that he thought the ''immature voice on mic is not allowed'' rule was still a thing and was asking for the kid to be muted for that. If that were the case then you guys should have informed him that it was no longer a rule and that it was removed.

Just gonna respond to you guys, and then let the community decide as even the higherups and I disagree. A permanent ban obviously has no falloff date because it hasn't been served because it's permanent, so this example makes no sense to me @Vexx, nor am I suggesting for permanent bans to automatically be unbanned after a certain amount of time.
 
Someone who fully serves a punishment years ago, should not blindly be followed to a greater punishment. The context of "he doesn't learn" has 0 basis if he's been on and off the server for years with no further punishment. We're a gaming community... do you honestly think the punishment fits the crime? @Sesh
 
@Bello Agree with your points, his previous bans have completely 0 correlation, how does that imply he "hasn't changed" or "doesn't learn"

How does being toxic without having been banned for it justify a month ban? Yes, he was banned for something else and maybe he was toxic, but jumping straight to a month ban seems way too much.

He was kicked yesterday and has a major history of toxicity according to most TGH specific staff. Clearly shows no improvement so why should he be kicked so he can come back and do it again tomorrow?

He should have at least been kicked first.
If I recall correctly, his last ban was for abusing calladmin - the argument that he "hasn't changed after two years" doesn't make any sense since an "instigating" name and calladmin abuse isn't the same. I feel like a month is way too much, lol.

Well in the event it was accidental, no. But if it was an intentional freekill, and you had been warned and kicked up to this point, then yeah it would be a month ban since you knew it was against the rules, and knew you would eventually face repercussions for it. Once again, if you'd like we can add a falloff date for bans to about a year or so, but it's something I highly would not recommend.

When you take into consideration we keep certain people permed for things that happened years ago here or there depending (and I'm not talking about people who did really heinous things) then having someone's ban history carry over from years ago isn't exactly much further off, especially if they haven't changed much and the most you hear about them is that they're frequently a troublemaker for the hell of it from older players- also could see this myself during some of the times I was on while Brian was on.
 

 
I'd honestly say yes probably if it was intentional- if you really didn't learn your lesson or change within two years then why would you receive a more lax punishment?

Okay I'll just give you an example then, if I'm a member of this community and I freekilled enough to get a week ban, if in over 2 years I freekilled someone again, do I deserve a month ban?
 
@Kypari if kicks aren't an issue, I would definitely recommend using a kick to get someone's attention if it is something as minor as a name. This gives the person a surefire way to get your message, and you can prevent issues like this in the future where the person might not have seen a warning.

@Kypari does sourcebans being disabled also prevent being able to be kicked? I'm asking that as a legitimate question.
 
Also, I would like to hear the feedback from @Bello, @Vexx, @Sesh and @mrnutty12. You guys believe this warrants a month ban despite his last ban being over 2 years ago over something unrelated? I personally find a 1 month ban over his name insanely excessive, especially after his previous ban being so long ago.
 
Tagging @virr as well since I appreciate his input.

@virr Get that weak waifu shit outta here. Sasha is trash and everyone knows it; she almost got killed off until the editor said no.

I want to fuck annie's hot titan ass

@virr Get that weak waifu shit outta here. Sasha is trash and everyone knows it; she almost got killed off until the editor said no.

Smh everyone knows that Christa is best girl closely followed by Sasha.

trying out for FaZe, i made SoaR but im going for something biGGer and beTTer, please sub to my yt channel
 
heres my tryout vid. Giving away Aegean's sister (Palestinian but it is what it is :/) at 100k subSCRIBERS.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EeilkHJCj64
#likeforlikes #subforsub #followforfollow #giveaway

I think we need to regulate penises. And ONLY penises. Oh, let's also restrict the availability of resources available for men, and force men to get a psychological screening before they have sex. Every time. Now, I concede that pregnancy and sex are two different things, yes, but in context of the genders at hand, if men can't control the location in which their dicks are inserted, then it's no different than women being able to control their ovaries. Obviously. It's not like they're forced to ejaculate or even knowingly do. Therefore, let's have government screw with the personal lives of all men, and make their lives tougher overall.
 
On a serious note, my favorite argument for abortion is the one present by Steven Levitt, Professor of Economics at the University of Chicago and author of Freakonomics. If you've read the book, then you would know of the Donohue-Levitt Hypothesis which is the theory that legalized abortion contributed significantly to the falling crime rates in the 90s, which if you are from the USA, was a huge deal as many economists and sociologists were predicting "blood in the streets" during that same time period due to the rise of cocaine and crack and the crimes that came with it in the 80s. Now, correlation does not imply causation, which is a fundamental rule in statistics. However, a correlation can be a good indicator of a contributing variable among several other ones. Anyways, the main argument Professor Levitt offers is this: that mothers knew the situations they got themselves into, and took the responsible response and aborted their fetuses. Although disgusting, it is true that the majority of crime occurs in areas of poor, ethnic, urban neighborhoods, which also have women whose children will be more susceptible to crime due to these poor conditions. By aborting their children, oftentimes the mother-to-be were making a conscientious and logical decision to better themselves, and also to prevent their child from experiencing the horrors of reality. It's not about preventing the death of some future "Beethoven" or "Steve Jobs," but about true parenting and sacrifice. This is, in its own way, beautiful, and no government regulation should stand between a woman and her own difficult decision.

So, you've decided that you want to join xG?
 
In order to become a member of xG, the applicant must meet the following requirements:
You must be at least 13 years old. Not already a member of a different clan. Have minimum 12 hours on our servers (Subject to change at a later date)  After 2 days of your member application you will either get accepted or declined. If you are declined membership for any reason, you may not reapply for a minimum of 30 days. If there are issues with your application, you may get an extra 5 days maximum to fix and answer any problems, or it will be automatically declined. 4/7/2017
 
If you have left or got kicked out of xG, and are allowed to re-apply, you must have
5 positive vouches of which at least 2 must be from a Higher Up (Division Manager or higher) for your application to be accepted.  
Vouching guidelines:
Only existing members in xG are allowed to vouch. Your vouch may be deemed invalid if you fail to follow these guidelines.
When vouching +1/-1s for any applicant - please consider the following:
 
Is he/she active?. Does he/she listen to rules or admin directive when given? Or disrespect & break rules? Is he/she fun to play with? Be respectful with your comments. Why you feel the user should or should not become a member. Include maturity(M) and activity(A) ratings on a scale from 1 - 10. You are not to -1 any member you have never interacted with, hearsay / inactivity is not a valid reason.  
Failure to follow these guidelines will result in the rejection of your submission.
-Updated 3/20 - 2019
 
IF YOU ARE READY, CLICK HERE TO APPLY!

Division:

Garrys Mod In-Game Name:

derp Steam ID:

STEAM_0:0:37581665 Information:

i was harasd by furry anime kids and then three died adn i was baned 4 tree yrs
 
wtf

>callgoblingaming.dylan
>probablybecauseheis
>imeantheserverdidavoteandeveryoneagreed

>be me
>not gaming.dylan or dylan12
>get called it anyway
>mfw :mad: