diabeetus

Some of these +1's have invalid reasons, just pointing that out (ex: eric's post, uryuu's post and cookie's post) I always thought that you had to get 20 +1's and co-leader approval no matter what if you left xG and were re-applying, but if @@Rhododendron or @Forest could clarify this it would be appreciated.

is it ever not winter in Canada? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFvLa2Kr62Q ^ wintery right?

lol

-1 Vector bullied me into doing this he was going to post my nudies. Please don't make fun of me I'll drink bleach.

I'm a fan of pretty much everything Fitz & The Tantrums put out, they really should be much bigger considering how superb a lot of their songs are. I personally find this video to be pretty damn funny, it's a great tune as well. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGBLlFMn9Xc

+1 and we might as well remove sand while we're at it. Quite possibly the worst map on the JB server right now (other than lego).

lol

sucks to suck

requesting perm greentext ban

This might sound a little harsh, but please fuck off the forums already. I think people liked Purple more than you.

Horrible forum troll is horrible. Requesting a perm forum ban ASAP, before he infects us all.

Wow these threads are amazing please keep making them! no one cares

toplel

yay vector!

I quit

rip

it might help to be in the clan before asking for admin powers.

best thread 2013

ok the commenting is annoying/buggy as shit so I'm just going to type out my full reply. Like it says in the motd, CT's aren't allowed to kill a T for rebelling unless they see that T commit a rebellious action. In a normal round of jailbreak, a CT is not allowed to kill a T because he heard the T knife a vent or if the CT sees a T kill someone in the kill feed (but does not see the T actually kill the CT). We should enforce the rules the same on !lr. If the T lures a lone CT into a room and kills him (without choosing the rebel option in the !lr menu) then the CT's shouldn't be able to kill said T on sight without seeing that T further commit a rebellious action. If we just start allowing the CT's to kill the rebellious T on !lr just on a hunch or because they saw the T kill someone through the kill feed, then our motd contradicts itself. We should aim for our motd to be as uniform as possible, so CT's should react to the rebellious T on !lr exactly the same as they would any other rebellious T. Just like the rest of the round, the motd should state that CT's must see the T commit a rebellious action in order to kill said T, regardless if it's !lr or not. It's just all about consistency.

+1 just a common sense thing right here, it doesn't really make much sense for our rules to contradict each other in different parts. @@DarkWolf6052 @@Eucliwood input plas.

this is some superb evidence I must say

who are you?

@@Rhododendron are bitcoins an accepted form of payment for a donation?

fucked? <-- toplel gotta love that censoring Not really gonna do anything, might hang with some amigos. On a more serious note, please be safe when going out tonight, you gotta make sure to check candy for syringes, they've become a serious problem recently.