Matsi

That is assuming ass isn't being used to describe someone in a derogative manner. I mean, its closely associated with curse words, isn't it? Although I do agree, especially because there is a large assortment of curse words that are way more harmful than ass. I feel like if we group together to form an association or assembly of sorts, we can present our case in an assertive manner to rid the more.. Offensive "curse" words. That way we can make a more assessable case, n'ah mean? Besides, it gets annoying when we use words that start with ass, because then it becomes a huge cluster fudge of mismatched words. Just assign the censors to more offensive words, that's all we want. Hell, if you want I can provide any assistance in identifying which are the worst, of which there are quite a few I assure you.
 
Irrelevant post I know, but, it needs to be addressed as its becoming more of an inconvenience than an asset.
 
Ass. :coffee:

Division:

Nuclear Dawn Staff Name:

Stickz, Vertex Staff's Steam ID:

STEAM_0:0:7181974 Evidence:

NDix Germany -Really Laggy Server :: Nuclear Dawn General Discussions Further Information:

i still have the responsibility to bring this under your notion, as i think that everybody with an xG tag in front of there name, haz a example funtion.
 
as there are many ND players feel the same way FB

Yeah... I don't see the problem here. As far as I understood, he was just pointing out some poor server performance/config. You don't have to take his advice either. (Which it sounds like pretty sound advice to me).
 
Closed.

Accidently knocked over a can of sprite right into the top fan openings on my tower.... ended up ruining my video card, motherboard, and CPU....
 
I bought a few new parts:
AMD FX-6300 Vishera 6-Core 3.5GHz (4.1GHz Turbo) Socket AM3+ 95W FD6300WMHKBOX Desktop Processor - Newegg.com
ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z AM3+ AMD 990FX SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX AMD Gaming Motherboard with 3-Way SLI/CrossFireX Support and UEFI BIOS - Newegg.com
 
and saving up another ~$350 so I can also get ASUS STRIX-GTX970-DC2OC-4GD5 GeForce GTX 970 4GB 256-Bit GDDR5 PCI Express 3.0 HDCP Ready SLI Support G-SYNC Support Video Card - Newegg.com
 
so ya... that's why I haven't been on in the last week very much =/

Accidently knocked over a can of sprite right into the top fan openings on my tower.... ended up ruining my video card, motherboard, and CPU....
 
I bought a few new parts:
AMD FX-6300 Vishera 6-Core 3.5GHz (4.1GHz Turbo) Socket AM3+ 95W FD6300WMHKBOX Desktop Processor - Newegg.com
ASUS Crosshair V Formula-Z AM3+ AMD 990FX SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX AMD Gaming Motherboard with 3-Way SLI/CrossFireX Support and UEFI BIOS - Newegg.com
 
and saving up another ~$350 so I can also get ASUS STRIX-GTX970-DC2OC-4GD5 GeForce GTX 970 4GB 256-Bit GDDR5 PCI Express 3.0 HDCP Ready SLI Support G-SYNC Support Video Card - Newegg.com
 
so ya... that's why I haven't been on in the last week very much =/

Well then, is there a way to make it so the only access you have is to upload files to the ban? That's what I was really after, so I don't have to keep the files on my computer and risk deleting them.

I think we should give staff access to sourcebans, IE give every staff member logins that allow them to edit their own bans, for purposes of fixing banlengths, typos, and uploading demos and screenshots to bans. Doing this would not only allow staff members to fix their ban reasons when they forget to use quotes but also allow, and potentially create a rule for, adding evidence to bans. Such a rule could be something that requires staff to upload a screenshot or demo to any permanent ban they do. The ability to supply such proof on perm bans will be greatly helpful if the ban was protested 2-5 years later and/or if the staff that issued the ban is no longer around.
 
I don't understand how xG has been around for so long and has never implemented this feature for it's staff.
 
@Rhododendron @Nomulous @Hidingmaster @ThePenguin @diabeetus @Gawd @DrLee @kbraszzz @Rejects

I think we should give staff access to sourcebans, IE give every staff member logins that allow them to edit their own bans, for purposes of fixing banlengths, typos, and uploading demos and screenshots to bans. Doing this would not only allow staff members to fix their ban reasons when they forget to use quotes but also allow, and potentially create a rule for, adding evidence to bans. Such a rule could be something that requires staff to upload a screenshot or demo to any permanent ban they do. The ability to supply such proof on perm bans will be greatly helpful if the ban was protested 2-5 years later and/or if the staff that issued the ban is no longer around.
 
I don't understand how xG has been around for so long and has never implemented this feature for it's staff.
 
@Rhododendron @Nomulous @Hidingmaster @ThePenguin @diabeetus @Gawd @DrLee @kbraszzz @Rejects

.... anyone that can't be trusted shouldn't be given powers in the first place.... what obvious reasons? You can set it up so that people can just edit their own bans and upload demos/screenshots.... what's the problem? Laziness?

I think we should give staff access to sourcebans, IE give every staff member logins that allow them to edit their own bans, for purposes of fixing banlengths, typos, and uploading demos and screenshots to bans. Doing this would not only allow staff members to fix their ban reasons when they forget to use quotes but also allow, and potentially create a rule for, adding evidence to bans. Such a rule could be something that requires staff to upload a screenshot or demo to any permanent ban they do. The ability to supply such proof on perm bans will be greatly helpful if the ban was protested 2-5 years later and/or if the staff that issued the ban is no longer around.
 
I don't understand how xG has been around for so long and has never implemented this feature for it's staff.
 
@Rhododendron @Nomulous @Hidingmaster @ThePenguin @diabeetus @Gawd @DrLee @kbraszzz @Rejects

I think we should give staff access to sourcebans, IE give every staff member logins that allow them to edit their own bans, for purposes of fixing banlengths, typos, and uploading demos and screenshots to bans. Doing this would not only allow staff members to fix their ban reasons when they forget to use quotes but also allow, and potentially create a rule for, adding evidence to bans. Such a rule could be something that requires staff to upload a screenshot or demo to any permanent ban they do. The ability to supply such proof on perm bans will be greatly helpful if the ban was protested 2-5 years later and/or if the staff that issued the ban is no longer around.
 
I don't understand how xG has been around for so long and has never implemented this feature for it's staff.
 
@Rhododendron @Nomulous @Hidingmaster @ThePenguin @diabeetus @Gawd @DrLee @kbraszzz @Rejects

I think we should give staff access to sourcebans, IE give every staff member logins that allow them to edit their own bans, for purposes of fixing banlengths, typos, and uploading demos and screenshots to bans. Doing this would not only allow staff members to fix their ban reasons when they forget to use quotes but also allow, and potentially create a rule for, adding evidence to bans. Such a rule could be something that requires staff to upload a screenshot or demo to any permanent ban they do. The ability to supply such proof on perm bans will be greatly helpful if the ban was protested 2-5 years later and/or if the staff that issued the ban is no longer around.
 
I don't understand how xG has been around for so long and has never implemented this feature for it's staff.
 
@Rhododendron @Nomulous @Hidingmaster @ThePenguin @diabeetus @Gawd @DrLee @kbraszzz @Rejects

No evidence. Just wait out the day ban.
-closed

It's too bad that xG has a stern policy on suicide threats but not something like this.... :(

Someone changed the capping rule to now allow hale to cap when any of six different classes out of the total of nine are alive..... wtf is that about?
 
So now you basically get to cap as hale if anyone but a medic, sniper, or engy is alive....
 
Please change it back to just scout hyper heavy and flyros..... this is ridiculous.

Someone changed the capping rule to now allow hale to cap when any of six different classes out of the total of nine are alive..... wtf is that about?
 
So now you basically get to cap as hale if anyone but a medic, sniper, or engy is alive....
 
Please change it back to just scout hyper heavy and flyros..... this is ridiculous.

I'm closing this and banning Hatric for 4 days

Then someone post some proof of this other stuff he is doing... not just some bullshit ban request for building a dispenser.... lolol
 
I've built towers of teleporters on JB before... it's called "having fun" some of you should try it before TF2 turns into CSS...

-1 ...... really??? he... built a dispenser..... on a server.... with FOUR people.... on a freeday.....
 
Overreacting much?

+1
He also rages a lot on Pokemon, swearing, disrespecting. He deserves it.

Neither is speaking in a language other than English.... but I don't kick the entire population of FF2 every day at 2am because of it....

-1 ...... really??? he... built a dispenser..... on a server.... with FOUR people.... on a freeday.....
 
Overreacting much?

*rates post smelly* Yeeep. I can see where this is going.
 
So putting the lenny face after everything you say, aka spamming it, is not trolling? Riiiiight. I'm "interrupting your fun"? There were 28 people on the server, of the 28, only 5 disagreed with the vote. You were trying to start arguments over something that was already decided.
 
 
troll
trōl/
verb
gerund or present participle: trolling

1.
informal
make a deliberately offensive or provocative online posting with the aim of upsetting someone or eliciting an angry response from them.

 
Pretty much sounds like what you were doing. The more you keep twisting my words, making up excuses, and saying dumb things only continually proves my point.
 
So, thank you. You have a good day now. :)

Someone changed the capping rule to now allow hale to cap when any of six different classes out of the total of nine are alive..... wtf is that about?
 
So now you basically get to cap as hale if anyone but a medic, sniper, or engy is alive....
 
Please change it back to just scout hyper heavy and flyros..... this is ridiculous.

Someone changed the capping rule to now allow hale to cap when any of six different classes out of the total of nine are alive..... wtf is that about?
 
So now you basically get to cap as hale if anyone but a medic, sniper, or engy is alive....
 
Please change it back to just scout hyper heavy and flyros..... this is ridiculous.