×
  • Sign In
  • Sign In



    Or sign in with one of these services

  • Sign Up
Jump to content

YeEternalTuna

Members
  • Content Count

    512
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    YeEternalTuna reacted to Thorax_ in Hub Shop Icons   
    Alright, here are the Hub Category Icons
    Still working on more :p
     

     
    *I am aware the server shop icon background color doesn’t match, I will fix it.
     
    @Rhododendron @Aegean @james8470
  2. Informative
    YeEternalTuna reacted to Rejects in Vs. Saxton Hale Revive.   
    the server has actually been ready for a while now it just needed testing
    and I uh kinda forgot to test :p
  3. Agree
    YeEternalTuna reacted to Egossi in Later   
    Dont come back
  4. Bad Spelling
    YeEternalTuna reacted to CappyCappy in Member Application Changes!   
    So what is going on here? People doesn't even need 4 normal vouches to join? Sigh....
  5. Creative
    YeEternalTuna reacted to Thunder in Later   
    What are you talking about? Bagels mic is so quiet it doesnt matter anyway.
  6. Informative
    YeEternalTuna reacted to Egossi in Member Application Changes!   
    How the fuck does one call themselves british and not know the difference between "no one" and "know one" lol
  7. Ding!
    YeEternalTuna reacted to Forest in Member Application Changes!   
    Do keep in mind that there are many contributing factors to how often you may see an applicant which is why it is rarely a legitimate reason to negatively vouch for someone (unless the rank site shows otherwise). Most prominently, the largest factor is the possible time-zone difference between yourself and the applicant. Like Aegean said, there are 24 hours in a day which allows huge flexibility in terms of when a Player actually hops on the Server. At the time you may be playing, the applicant may be in school or at work, and vice-versa.
     
    Additionally, you should only be negatively vouching if you have a valid reason to be doing so. If nothing comes to mind, you should not be going out of your way to dig up some dirt on the applicant, so-to-speak. If the applicant plays on a Server that you do not play on, then you should have no sway on that application (assuming this is your only reason to negatively vouch).
     
    Of course you can give your opinion on the applicant if you have a reasonable understanding of their character or have interacted with him/her, but again, you should not be negatively vouching based on how often you see the applicant as this is completely subjective and otherwise unfair due to the number of Players who don't play on every Server but have a selective one or two of which they prefer.
  8. Ding!
    YeEternalTuna reacted to Spoopy in Tinyturtle   
    +1 This turtle gets away with tiny stuff.
    A: 9
    M: more mature than a 12 year old (tatost)
  9. Winner
    YeEternalTuna reacted to realBelloWaldi in Bye Bye   
    How about you go to a barber for once?
  10. Like
    YeEternalTuna reacted to TinyPanda in Tinyturtle   
    In-Game Name:

    TinyPanda (was TinyTurtle) Active Division:

    Team Fortress 2 Previously a Member in xG:

    No Identity:

    Steam Community :: TinyPanda Banned:

    No Teamspeak Account Synced:

    No Time Active on Servers:

    2 days 11 hours Age:

    15 Reasons for Joining:

    I enjoy playing and communicating with the people on the servers. The staff are very friendly and I enjoy playing with the regulars.
  11. Funny
    YeEternalTuna reacted to Vacindak in Bye Bye   
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DedalRtKYyg
  12. Informative
    YeEternalTuna reacted to Aegean in Suiperblade - Team Fortress 2   
    I'll unban once I'm home
  13. Agree
    YeEternalTuna reacted to Vector in Member Application Changes!   
    Honestly, i don't see why you couldn't just lower the requirements to like 2 +1s and not 7 plus an admin (at least for TF2). I honestly don't see how getting 2 members to +1 it is hard. A few times, i have seen people join not even be that much of a conversationalist and still get the vouches because they are active on the server and they see them a lot. Even two vouches seems to be fair because if you wish to join xG, it should take some part on the other person's end to get to know the community. a bunch of new members is fine, but what happens when people try to join the clan under a different name then what is recognized on the servers? For example. Say User A, was is a little bit of a jerk to the point where you can justify a -1, he can theoretically get in because some people just don't pay attention to the member submission, since it's lower down on the website. another concern of mine is that it makes it much harder to tell who is and who isn't in xG with the large amount of member requests that will theoretically be made. I don't know, i think it's just a very dramatic change, could it work? Sure, but i guess my concerns are about what could happen. I'm not sure what the community in CS:GO is like but there are a lot of silly people in TF2. Also i'm just a little concerned about dividing members between Juniors and Seniors. It makes me feel that there is gonna be a sense of superiority over people who haven't been here or who aren't that active on forums. I honestly think that we are all xG members, and just adding junior and senior might be a bit confusing or breed some unforeseen shit-posting. Trust me, I've been on other forums who have had problems like that where people fought over post count and other similar things. (Muthead.com being one of the worst offenders despite being a very informative website)
     
    EDIT: also why don't we move the membership forum up on the website? As i mentioned before member submissions are at the bottom of the website, if you wanna push member applications, why not make an advertisement on the website AND move the members section up more and move some of the lesser used forms lower? @Aegean
  14. F!$k Off
    YeEternalTuna got a reaction from Egossi in Suiperblade - Team Fortress 2   
    I <3 Xenogamers is what it says
  15. Agree
    YeEternalTuna reacted to Goblins in Suiperblade - Team Fortress 2   
    We've got Mr. Observant over here.
     
    He donated, made the message, thumbs up in the picture. He should be set honestly.
  16. Informative
    YeEternalTuna got a reaction from Vacindak in Suiperblade - Team Fortress 2   
    I <3 Xenogamers is what it says
  17. Sad
    YeEternalTuna got a reaction from realBelloWaldi in Bye Bye   
    Oh no!
  18. Informative
    YeEternalTuna reacted to realBelloWaldi in Bye Bye   
    going on vacation
    leaving in like 10 minutes so this thread is gonna be very short
    ill be gone for 7 days, ill still browse the forums but thats about it
    see ya @Aegean
  19. Sad
    YeEternalTuna reacted to MineCrack in Hello   
    @Aegean
     

    LAFFFFF
  20. Ding!
    YeEternalTuna reacted to virr in Hello   
    @TheSupremePatriot @Kypari stop arguing. People shit post sometimes, you don't have to read the thread if it doesn't interest you.
  21. Ding!
    YeEternalTuna reacted to Vacindak in Firextinger   
    Ok... I saw you few times in our surf server.... Tak tak tak tak. I think you have 30 hours actually i'm not sure at all.
     
    Did you say sentrys?
    admins never do their jobs? Wuuuut? Uhhhhh kypari :0
     
    OK OK OK relax relax....I think you played in an other surf server.
     
    First at all,In an our surf server Is totally impossible to build sentrys If you are playing as engineer.
     
    If you want sentrys you could nominate surf_horizont and push the kill button Or go to surf_overlook. Apart from that, did you say the admins don't do anything? OK.I'm not an admin but we have an admin who is extremely active and comes everyday at surf and his name is kypari,he always puts order in our server, probably the best doing that.Basically the Strictest admin we have also good singer and nice guy.
     
    Third,are you really 32 years old?
    I read your profile description.
    Personally,i think putting " I. Like memes and memedroid "and "If you found This profile you are a papu" etc etc etc....by the way, I'm a Spanish speaker. I'm from Perú so I can speak Spanish perfectly well,to be honest. Your Spanish grammar is not appropriate for someone who is 32 Years old,
    I don't Know, is hard to believe.
     
    (talking about grammar, I'm not save...-_- xd)
     
    I'm going to give you an advice.
    Try to be honest to yourself.
     
    If you Want to be an admin, you can get it But without lies.
  22. Agree
    YeEternalTuna reacted to Thorax_ in Killermemestar   
    @mrnutty12 @Vexx
    This is WAAAYYYYYY old.
  23. Informative
    YeEternalTuna got a reaction from Thorax_ in Codyormoney   
    I'm still not sure how the new member stuff works but I'll just do how I THINK it works. -1 I still think you need more time because I've only seen you once coming on the server and that was a day ago or two and from what I could tell you were new and did NOT read the rules. I say this because I told you to remove your teleporter from spawn and you refused even after I gave you a good 10 seconds to destroy it and I had to kick you. Just from this first experience I honestly don't think you're ready to become member yet.
  24. Winner
    YeEternalTuna reacted to Forest in Member Application Changes!   
    I suppose it makes sense, but at the same time it just feels like the bar has been set too low to gain full-membership. It's worrisome because what if a Member Application only receives one positive vouch that is simply "seen him around on servers, he's pretty fun +1" during that two day period, with no negative vouches or anything? As the rule currently stands (assuming this is the polished final product):
     

     
    It just seems like this system is heavily dependent on those who vouch immediately on a Member Submission (based on the fact that the applicant will be accepted, not can be accepted), which is either incredibly rare, or the vouches themselves are no where near detailed enough. With the way it is currently set, the Guidelines seem to put a lot more emphasis on why someone shouldn't be permitted to gain full-membership instead of why they should be. That being said, it isn't inherently bad or anything. It just feels less like a Member Submission and more like a minor hurdle to jump over; just barely one step over what someone has to do to join the Xeno Gamers Steam Group. Also, just for the sake of debate, I'm only voicing my concerns, not trying to step this whole thing into the ground. Apologies in advance if it seems that way.
     
    Annnd just thought I'd mention this: not sure if this was intended, but the Guidelines thread doesn't highlight the whole "2 day processing time" anywhere in it. That, or I'm blind af.
  25. Informative
    YeEternalTuna reacted to Vacindak in Tragicmike - Team Fortress 2   
    My internet is bad but is not always laging. I play surf Combat, That is not a normal game. Is totally HARD to bhop with space if you have 180 ping.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rh0ggUFNaqQ
     
     
    Apart from that. i banned that guy at 3:24 Am. basically at night my ping is good (120 -115 Ping) because all my family members are sleeping.
     
     
    Second. I found something interesting.
     
    I was watching Mike´s profile. then i saw Melolzcore in the comments section.
     
    [ATTACH]28170[/ATTACH]
     
    Them I Remember ..Did Nutty ban that guy before?
     
     
     
     
    Yes he Did!!
     
    Xeno Gamers
     
    Player Information | Xeno Gamers
     
    And guess what. he got ban for the same Situation "Silent aim"
     
     
     
    Is a extremly rare Coincidence. i´m not saying he is Melolzcore. But he has 60 friends in steam ... well 58 without me and lemon , He has only 5 Comment in his profile. Too less for someone who plays 3800hours in tf2 also started playing tf2 in 2012.