hongkongatron

He should have at least been kicked first.
If I recall correctly, his last ban was for abusing calladmin - the argument that he "hasn't changed after two years" doesn't make any sense since an "instigating" name and calladmin abuse isn't the same. I feel like a month is way too much, lol.

@Kypari does sourcebans being disabled also prevent being able to be kicked? I'm asking that as a legitimate question.
 
Also, I would like to hear the feedback from @Bello, @Vexx, @Sesh and @mrnutty12. You guys believe this warrants a month ban despite his last ban being over 2 years ago over something unrelated? I personally find a 1 month ban over his name insanely excessive, especially after his previous ban being so long ago.
 
Tagging @virr as well since I appreciate his input.

I warned him twice just to check if he was paying attention. He clearly wasn't so I just banned him.

 
If someone hasn't changed in the last few years then the punishment system clearly needs to continue. They haven't reformed as a person so myself and the TF2 higheurps believe that the system should continue, regardless of how long ago the bans were.

I do appreciate the fact that you have logs showing that you did in fact warn him to change his name, however the fact he didn't respond to you at all means he might not have seen it so try to keep that in mind in the future. Regardless, his name was to trigger the staff which is why I do believe he should have got punished in some sort if people did get offended which apparently they did.
 
The issue I have was he had a name that upset staff, so you decided a month ban was the right decision? He got a week ban 2 years ago about call admin, and the previous day ban before that was something he got pardoned for. If you're going to go off his history, please try to use some discretion and understand that although we have a system for how we ban, I feel like it should be common sense that someone who didn't get punished for years shouldn't automatically get a more severe punishment their next offense, regardless of when it occurred or the level of offense.
 
Context matters a lot for staff, and I would prefer you guys think about issues critically before blindly following a guide that is meant to give you a foundation when trying to uphold the rules instead of it being the golden guide that should be followed to a T.

I wanted to know if the server could get a marriage plugin [PLAIN]Marriage (Reloaded) [1.12-1.8][/PLAIN] Pretty simple and i just thought alot of people would like it

:( my e-girlfriend is gone for a while

2 of the 3 gags are valid, they do lack reasons though. These gags took place 2-3 years ago so a warning would be fair at this current moment.
 

3 of the 4 bans are invalid, and are not to be counted. The only server ban was by Chicken Panda and that was 1 hour.
These bans however took place 2-3 years ago therefore, a warning would be fair at this current moment.
 
 
Although their behavior is disgusting... they were warned about it a long time ago, so it would be fair to give them a friendly refresher about it and if they continue, then action should be taken.
 
-1 for ban
+1 for warning

However, despite knowing this, you still lied saying that you didn't plan to grief anything when you literally told me you were going to grief part of Kontknat that wasn't claimed.

the irony of this thread and your comment and the fact you rating bombed me proves youre not taking jokes lightly xd
 
 
I'm not defending Jackie or anything but she should be allowed the human decency of a semi professional response without being heckled by passive aggressive comments. you dummy

How do you expect me to think this thread is ironic/a joke in the slightest when i dont know the person who made it?
 
In what way was your rating a "joke"?

How was that passive aggressive in any way??? Lmao jfc @grap_grop is not her parent why would he actually be mad about her not going outside
 
Holy shit you're dumb as a brick
 
PS. You're in no place to tell anyone what they can and cant post in the first place, most you should do is ask a higher up if its an alright post and like i said if its not they'll take care of it

im saying this in the nicest way possible, jackie
 
please actually fucking go outside for once

-1 absolutely not. As mentioned before he has a huge problem with people killing him but he also has a problem with the admins in general @Elcark warned him not to use certain buttons on MASSCC and he instantly threw a fit cursing all admins and left the server before we could even talk to him. Then when I tried to add him to talk to him about his behavior he refused to add me.

-1 Makes a lot of members really uncomfortable with erotic roleplay and the sorts, I've also seen quite a bit of toxicity on the servers.

This guy got hyper-upset about my soldier loadout. Like upset at me, as a person, for what cosmetics I used as a specific class in a video game, and proceeded to be hyper-toxic until he got fed up and left. I don't know, maybe he was just off that day or whatever, but I feel like members that are immediately hostile based on the way someone's character in a videogame looks, (this wasn't a situation where he got irritated that I used the reserve shooter or anything, he was just legitimately upset about the cosmetics I was wearing, actually legitimately angry,) aren't people who should be representing xG.
 
I've also heard numerous horror stories about Zach's searches for a sexy ERP partner.
-1

Yeah -1

im saying this in the nicest way possible, jackie
 
please actually fucking go outside for once

Hey there Jackie! First of all, thank you for making a post and wanting to discuss this with us. It is by adressing issues like these we grow as a community and hopefully makes xg a better place for all of us! There are a couple of points in your post i would like to adress and discuss, hopefully that's ok.
 

xG is privately owned which means that we are allowed to set our own rules and regulations that our users have to follow. We as a community has chosen to disallow the word in question, if you agree with it or not thats up to you.
 

Right. I know urban dictonary isnt really a valid source but i figured it would be appropriate considerng what word we're talking about.
 

This is mostly a meme and is no way anything we endorse or have officially stated.
 

This was adressed fairly recently. You can read more here.
 

This is actually a pretty valid point and i want to expand a bit of why you think this is. The problem is that we're all separate individuals with different views and morals. You're right that a lot of rules do leave a lot of stuff up to interpretation for staff which is when these opinions and views come into play and sometimes might create conflicts and inconsistency depending on which staff is online at the time. This is something we're working towards resolving but it might take us a little while as things like this does take a lot of discussion to make things as fair as possible. Feel free to check out this thread as an example of what we did not too long ago.

im saying this in the nicest way possible, jackie
 
please actually fucking go outside for once

That's just unnecessary, if you're not here to vouch an actual reason don't post at all. simple as that
 
 
 
nonetheless -1, it would still be offensive to to call someone that. Not a lot can be reasoned here

im saying this in the nicest way possible, jackie
 
please actually fucking go outside for once

im saying this in the nicest way possible, jackie
 
please actually fucking go outside for once

We have always punished people for saying the word and always will. Even in the event it was not seen as offensive, it would still be loop-holing into saying the actual word. The whole Loli thing has already been discussed, you can see the results of that here: We should remove lolacon title. | Xeno Gamers. Completely removing the rules on slurs altogether would cultivate an absolutely toxic environment, so there is absolutely no way we will EVER do that. Please think before you make posts like this, it's really obvious why it's not allowed, it's common sense.
 
Relevant:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=id=XURRzofbMc0;t=108

im saying this in the nicest way possible, jackie
 
please actually fucking go outside for once

I recently got gagged for asking why Nigga is considered a slur and it just pisses me off to no end.
 
Nigga is NOT an offensive slur, it's used by black people all the time as a term of endearment. Literally
NO ONE is going to get offended by people saying it, so why punish people for it????? I find this to be
a breach of free speech. When people are intending to create hate-speech for people of color they just
say Nigger, plain and simple. It's just wrong and unfair to ban words like this because it just gives them
more notoriety for absolutely no reason. You can do a simple fucking google search and learn that Nigga
is used in a positive way unlike Nigger. I understand that the word has evil roots but that's really no excuse.
 
This is just an example of blatant hypocrisy employed by xG Staff, for example I get made fun of all the time
on xG for being a "girl gamer xdddd make me a sammich lmaooo xdd" but do you see me cry about it to admins?
No. Because I'm not a fucking pussy ass bitch, Admins don't even do anything about it when that happens.
xG claims to be a "safe space" but it really is not. There's talk of traps all the time which is considered a slur by some
transgender people, things like lolis are encouraged by titles like "Loli" or "Loli scout legionaire" and some people even
have sprays of it, which is sexualizing children which is wrong, and illegal and people like Rub1dium get hunted down
through facebook by an absolute creep.What's with all the double standards??????
 
Really xG staff needs to either get more consistent with their policies or just get rid of punishment for slurs altogether
because all you are doing by making slurs this big bad thing is giving the words more power and cultivating absolute SJW
pussies who get triggered at any sort of slur.