Moosty

It's a meme app and I doubt he means it but still +1. fink has been around forever lurking forums, took a bit of a year+ hiatus, still cash money AF. I'm fairly sure you were member before, but if you weren't and this is half salty over making the requirements easier, then just know I love you and would have +1'd all along.

Ratings are judgy and bad in general we should only have one rating, a gold star that says nice post.
 
But if we do have rude, bullying ratings, we should have the old ones, because they were funnier. The new ratings just look like normie emojis, I need my pixelated potleaf and runescape elf back, If I want emojis I'll go on twitter my dudes.
 
Real talk: The old, ugly ratings really added to the charm of xG, and made it feel unique. They were our special little inside jokes. I've honestly barely been rating posts since the change, there just isn't incentive and it's uninteresting.

Ratings are judgy and bad in general we should only have one rating, a gold star that says nice post.
 
But if we do have rude, bullying ratings, we should have the old ones, because they were funnier. The new ratings just look like normie emojis, I need my pixelated potleaf and runescape elf back, If I want emojis I'll go on twitter my dudes.
 
Real talk: The old, ugly ratings really added to the charm of xG, and made it feel unique. They were our special little inside jokes. I've honestly barely been rating posts since the change, there just isn't incentive and it's uninteresting.

Ratings are judgy and bad in general we should only have one rating, a gold star that says nice post.
 
But if we do have rude, bullying ratings, we should have the old ones, because they were funnier. The new ratings just look like normie emojis, I need my pixelated potleaf and runescape elf back, If I want emojis I'll go on twitter my dudes.
 
Real talk: The old, ugly ratings really added to the charm of xG, and made it feel unique. They were our special little inside jokes. I've honestly barely been rating posts since the change, there just isn't incentive and it's uninteresting.

Ratings are judgy and bad in general we should only have one rating, a gold star that says nice post.
 
But if we do have rude, bullying ratings, we should have the old ones, because they were funnier. The new ratings just look like normie emojis, I need my pixelated potleaf and runescape elf back, If I want emojis I'll go on twitter my dudes.
 
Real talk: The old, ugly ratings really added to the charm of xG, and made it feel unique. They were our special little inside jokes. I've honestly barely been rating posts since the change, there just isn't incentive and it's uninteresting.

Ratings are judgy and bad in general we should only have one rating, a gold star that says nice post.
 
But if we do have rude, bullying ratings, we should have the old ones, because they were funnier. The new ratings just look like normie emojis, I need my pixelated potleaf and runescape elf back, If I want emojis I'll go on twitter my dudes.
 
Real talk: The old, ugly ratings really added to the charm of xG, and made it feel unique. They were our special little inside jokes. I've honestly barely been rating posts since the change, there just isn't incentive and it's uninteresting.

Ratings are judgy and bad in general we should only have one rating, a gold star that says nice post.
 
But if we do have rude, bullying ratings, we should have the old ones, because they were funnier. The new ratings just look like normie emojis, I need my pixelated potleaf and runescape elf back, If I want emojis I'll go on twitter my dudes.
 
Real talk: The old, ugly ratings really added to the charm of xG, and made it feel unique. They were our special little inside jokes. I've honestly barely been rating posts since the change, there just isn't incentive and it's uninteresting.

Ratings are judgy and bad in general we should only have one rating, a gold star that says nice post.
 
But if we do have rude, bullying ratings, we should have the old ones, because they were funnier. The new ratings just look like normie emojis, I need my pixelated potleaf and runescape elf back, If I want emojis I'll go on twitter my dudes.
 
Real talk: The old, ugly ratings really added to the charm of xG, and made it feel unique. They were our special little inside jokes. I've honestly barely been rating posts since the change, there just isn't incentive and it's uninteresting.

Ratings are judgy and bad in general we should only have one rating, a gold star that says nice post.
 
But if we do have rude, bullying ratings, we should have the old ones, because they were funnier. The new ratings just look like normie emojis, I need my pixelated potleaf and runescape elf back, If I want emojis I'll go on twitter my dudes.
 
Real talk: The old, ugly ratings really added to the charm of xG, and made it feel unique. They were our special little inside jokes. I've honestly barely been rating posts since the change, there just isn't incentive and it's uninteresting.

Ratings are judgy and bad in general we should only have one rating, a gold star that says nice post.
 
But if we do have rude, bullying ratings, we should have the old ones, because they were funnier. The new ratings just look like normie emojis, I need my pixelated potleaf and runescape elf back, If I want emojis I'll go on twitter my dudes.
 
Real talk: The old, ugly ratings really added to the charm of xG, and made it feel unique. They were our special little inside jokes. I've honestly barely been rating posts since the change, there just isn't incentive and it's uninteresting.

Ayy so this is Lady Brienne of House Tarth (formerly named Bonnie, she even looks like you @BonfireCentipede hue)
 
 
She is a three year old pug/dachsund mix, and I just adopted the shit out of her.

Ayy so this is Lady Brienne of House Tarth (formerly named Bonnie, she even looks like you @BonfireCentipede hue)
 
 
She is a three year old pug/dachsund mix, and I just adopted the shit out of her.

Ayy so this is Lady Brienne of House Tarth (formerly named Bonnie, she even looks like you @BonfireCentipede hue)
 
 
She is a three year old pug/dachsund mix, and I just adopted the shit out of her.

Feliz cumple, mi amigo
 
Yo no soy listo
Donde es el bano?

"TL;DR - Don't hand out promotions from Member to above-Moderator to those who consistently step down (due to lack of interest, etc) unless you want to make a change to how activity works. Otherwise, you're practically creating a new position for inactive Staff."

-@Forest (backspaced too far for formatting, too lazy to redo)
 
 
 
This thread has obviously moved past my mostly joking statement, so I just want to say that
1. My vouch still stands for whichever position, mod/admin/no promotion(rekt boio) the higher ups decide most fit.
 
2. My specific exit from DM was a situation whefe I was told by my DL that I was being demoted to admin, and since my activity issues and life stuff that made it hard to DM were still there, I just stepped down all the way. Not sure if this would affect my re-application differently than @Egossi 's situation, I just wanted to point out for the purpose of full disclosure that our situations were different.
 
 
3. As to what forest said, I've long thought a separate admin-adjacent position (vote powers, though most that would qualify are uber donators so probably a non issue) for longtime staff that either step down/reapply alot, or might not be very active but are 100% trustworthy of the position. This position would be outside of the normal ladder and could only be added/removed/vouched for by Dm/DL/CM's. It would be harder to gain, with much laxer standards to maintain the position(besides abuse rules still applying equally obviously) just a thought, some variation could work.

"TL;DR - Don't hand out promotions from Member to above-Moderator to those who consistently step down (due to lack of interest, etc) unless you want to make a change to how activity works. Otherwise, you're practically creating a new position for inactive Staff."

-@Forest (backspaced too far for formatting, too lazy to redo)
 
 
 
This thread has obviously moved past my mostly joking statement, so I just want to say that
1. My vouch still stands for whichever position, mod/admin/no promotion(rekt boio) the higher ups decide most fit.
 
2. My specific exit from DM was a situation whefe I was told by my DL that I was being demoted to admin, and since my activity issues and life stuff that made it hard to DM were still there, I just stepped down all the way. Not sure if this would affect my re-application differently than @Egossi 's situation, I just wanted to point out for the purpose of full disclosure that our situations were different.
 
 
3. As to what forest said, I've long thought a separate admin-adjacent position (vote powers, though most that would qualify are uber donators so probably a non issue) for longtime staff that either step down/reapply alot, or might not be very active but are 100% trustworthy of the position. This position would be outside of the normal ladder and could only be added/removed/vouched for by Dm/DL/CM's. It would be harder to gain, with much laxer standards to maintain the position(besides abuse rules still applying equally obviously) just a thought, some variation could work.

Good call. All the TGH regulars have the clap, if not worse. Wash your hands before and after you click join and you MIGHT be safe.

Good call. All the TGH regulars have the clap, if not worse. Wash your hands before and after you click join and you MIGHT be safe.

Ayyy +1 deserves it and will do a fine job, but real talk if Bach and I had to be mod when we reapplied (except that one really, really stupid time) you gotta be mod or I'm specifically going to whine to @Bello a moderate amount, and probably start conspiracy theories of flavoritism.
 
 
Only half jk ;)

+1 active and mature enough. The quiet sniper we deserve.
 
A 9
M 8

Tfw my god tier calves get rekt by atrophy

Tfw my god tier calves get rekt by atrophy

Tfw my god tier calves get rekt by atrophy

Tfw my god tier calves get rekt by atrophy

NO! DON'T RATE THAT POST "AGGREE!"
You little scumbag you, Moosty >:U