SnowyMinion

Please check your grammar before you upload a ban request. Some people will favor you more. Bad grammar means that you spent less time posting the req. Less time means that you don't care. -1

When you request a ban you must show a little respect.
 
*STAY CALM -- Being angry won't help your case.

*ONLY-POST-ONCE: Just because you post a million times - does not mean we'll see it any faster - multiple posts will be ignored.

In this particular case, you may want to consider doing so. It doesn't look like many people are too receptive of it, even though I'm sure your intentions are good. Rather than consistently throwing a Ban Protest up, you may want to try a different approach. The likelihood of you being unbanned sooner does not increase at the rate you post Ban Protests, just so you're aware, but I commend your persistence :coffee:

This thread is a perfect example of why you should not be unbanned.

When you request a ban you must show a little respect.
 
*STAY CALM -- Being angry won't help your case.

When you request a ban you must show a little respect.
 
*STAY CALM -- Being angry won't help your case.

It's been a week not a million times besides its not like you guys get 100 and its not like i'm posting 20

+1

10 days is not 30.

Uploaded
 
I also used some music and Lightsaber sounds from some star wars games I have to make Vaders sounds better, the voice clips are still the same for obvious reasons
I replaced the weird dubstep music with these 2 songs :
[spoiler=Star Wars Battlefront 2 Soundtrack : Vader/Anakin's Theme]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hpdsm0mXr0
 
[spoiler=Star Wars Battlefront 2 Soundtrack : Vader's Theme (Knightfall) ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=08mJxfyUtE8
 
I made these songs almost perfect loops since they are kinda short
 
P.S Hina, Waluigi doesn't make people dance when he rages

Another duo boss might be nice... but single ones ehhh

-1 I haven't been playing a lot lately cause of exams but this guy screams in to his mic, made my ears bleed. Not an enjoyable experience. :(
A:8
M:4

I'm bored of TF2 once more so I barely get on nowadays, and even if I do I don't do jackshit and usually some other staff ends up doing what has to be done.
So I am stepping down back to member for now. No big deal though, don't go "Oh man I'll miss you so much... Like, literally crying right now.... ;-; have fun in life" cause I'm still here on the forums.
@BelloWaldi @Goblins @Rejects

Team Fortress 2 - Steam Charts nothing has really changed. People who are gonna play Overwatch have stopped playing TF2 long ago.
 
Plus now that Valve is actually releasing huge updates for TF2, it finally might breathe some life into the game :D

Alright, I would have + 1ed you, but due to your recent behavior in the past few weeks I have to -1 this.
You are annoying on the forums, you shitpost and you spam lennies, that makes me feel like you don't deserve to be a member. (n)
A:9
M:3

actuccaly oj +1'ed me i think

-1 can be salty and yell, also rather rude to anyone and everyone. also membership is a person to person thing. not an account to account thing.

The people claiming Overwatch will kill TF2 have clearly never played Overwatch.
 
The game is so radically different from TF2 that it's laughable to think it'd be considered the TF2 killer.

Back at it again with the Disagree ratingz

That doesn't matter you still need steam id just so we can get your steam

that's not your steam id also -1 because you break the rules here and there

Overwatch came out....
 
 
It's time to send our condolences to the great TF2.
 
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpWmvgYOlUU
 
in case that video didn't work...
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsGDtCFPkxk
 

Parov Stelar, ProleteR

I can understand that the overall week ban was due to poor knowledge of the rules as well as demonstrating a disrespectful behaviour toward Staff, but I still don't think the means justify the ends, seeing as how Owl himself stated that the demo doesn't demonstrate anyone technically freekilling. Why is Nick being singled out because of his ban history when there isn't any blatant evidence that he had freekilled in the first place? As Owl stated, he was banned before the thread (thereby leaving him to serve out the day ban) but then had his ban extended after this instance, so it must have had an influence on the week ban. The straw that broke the camel's back, so to speak.
 
In other words, he had a day ban prior, so that makes sense. However, he was involved in an incident that involved Ts being freekilled (albeit unknown to any of the Staff at the time, correct me if I'm wrong) but seeing as there was no recorded evidence of him actually killing freekilling, it shouldn't warrant an extension of a ban just because he might have freekilled. At this point, because of his past history, if, for example, he makes an honest mistake and freekills, he'll be punished more severely than anyone else even though the mistake could have been made by anyone which, to me, sounds biased in its own right.
 
Now, I'm not saying that people shouldn't be punished for breaking the rules, we have a step-up system in place for a reason (warning > kick > ban > extended ban), but I'm just imploring Staff to have a bit of empathy. Put yourself in their shoes, for whatever the player did, does he/she really deserve that amount of ban time to begin with? Did he/she make an honest mistake, or was it obvious/blatant that they did not have prior knowledge of the consequences to their actions and therefore should be banned longer to learn from and understand their mistake(s)? I'm just asking that before dropping the ban hammer, you consider the context of the situation and act accordingly. I just don't think that it's fair when Nick had a day to better himself (however unlikely) and was given a week for something he might have done.
 
I'm really hoping that Staff can reflect on this and don't just see it as someone defending a player with a ban history as with any other thread. I may not have been there for it, but that neutrality is what enables people like myself or anyone else to consider both sides of the story without giving a biased opinion or anything else of the sort.