Moosty

No, I'm saying If we have a rule against porn we should be consistent with it, not allow porn sometimes If people like a certain map. If we allow exceptions, the rule should say we allow exceptions.

No, I'm saying If we have a rule against porn we should be consistent with it, not allow porn sometimes If people like a certain map. If we allow exceptions, the rule should say we allow exceptions.

You're right, I added a third option to reduce confusion, thanks for the suggestion.
 
 
Edit: I can't edit original options though, it should make MORE sense now though

Yes and those naked women are In E R O T I C P O S ES, it doesn't mean it's not art. I think porn is objectively art, doesn't mean I think we should allow it.

So basically we have a map on TF2's Trade Gaming history that has a full body image of a nude woman, tits, bush, minge and all, and our staff has been allowing it because "it's artistic" well I looked at the rules and they said no nudity and to keep it PG-13, So I'm confused as to where I can find this "If it's artistic nudity is allowed" clause in our rules. I won't post an uncensored image, since nudity on forums is banned artistic or not(LOL it's almost like that's the rule), but here's one with the naughty bits covered by sprays, though it's clear what's happening under said sprays.
 
Steam Community :: Screenshot :: we don't allow nudity
 
 
I honestly Don't care about the decision either way as I like the map, I just don't want to see special treatment behind the communities back just because a map is well made and fun. If we allow it to stay I'd like a clause added to our rules that we host maps with nudity as long as DM+ find them artistic enough, because otherwise we're just breaking our own rules and confusing new players by randomly spawning them in front of a naked woman 10+ scout models tall while simultaneously telling them through motd that we're a pg-13 community that doesn't allow nudity. I just want consistency with our rules, or just transparency in cases we aren't consistent. that's my reason for making this thread.
 
 
 
tagging relevant staff @Vexx @Sesh @mrnutty12 @Bello @Aegean @Rhododendron @virr @whoever I forgot I'm sorry fam

Steam Community :: Screenshot :: we don't allow nudity
 
 
 
so does the PG 13 Rule apply if we allow it on our servers? I like to call this one "We're a strict PG-13 community that doesn't host nudity" because I'm petty. taken on Trade Gaming History, map is Cyberpunk 2_a

Nah you're right. I forgot our rules said "No nudity or sexual content of any kind, unless it's artistic, then you're gucci B"

Cuz admin?

He's a fictional dog

He's a fictional dog

Wow, I wasn't tagged @Bone

CONGRATULATIONS!
 
You have been accepted to join Xeno Gamers!
 
To begin your membership, familiarize yourself with our rules listed here. This is highly important and knowing these rules will keep you safe from bans!
 
Want to get Moderator?
 
There are a few ways to earn it!
1. Be active on TeamSpeak! To download TeamSpeak click here and then click 'Download Here' and download the appropriate client for your OS. Then just install, follow the 'Easy Setup' guide, and finally, click 'Connections' and 'Connect' and enter 'voice.xenogamers.com' in the 'Server Address' field.
2. Be active on the forums! This is one of the best ways to get your voice heard in Xeno Gamers!
3. Be active on the servers! This shows that you are committed to the clan!
 
For a server list, click here.
 
Come check out our staff list to see who is who on the servers, click here or here.
 
WE HOPE YOU ENJOY YOUR STAY!
 
Note: {note}

"I worked too hard to start at mod again and work my way back up. I think I'm done being staff"
-Rejects.
 
(Jk bby I'm not even mad. I did the same thing. It's unavoidable this clan is a black hole escape is futile plz help)
 
Honestly though +1. He's an effective moderator and knows all the rules. Besides, what abuse he did take part in was server access based to my understanding, and we have no reason to believe he isn't trustworthy with the basic commands. Let this man back on the roster, he'll do a fine job.
 
 
Plus I want my scottish bae back ;)

I don't know about the semantic differences between loli/lolicon or anything but let's just enforce our rules and not endorse this kind of thing. Whatever higher ups or more knowledgable people see fit to do, do it

"I worked too hard to start at mod again and work my way back up. I think I'm done being staff"
-Rejects.
 
(Jk bby I'm not even mad. I did the same thing. It's unavoidable this clan is a black hole escape is futile plz help)
 
Honestly though +1. He's an effective moderator and knows all the rules. Besides, what abuse he did take part in was server access based to my understanding, and we have no reason to believe he isn't trustworthy with the basic commands. Let this man back on the roster, he'll do a fine job.
 
 
Plus I want my scottish bae back ;)

The creator you speak of is @ColdEndeavour . He created enju, kogane, v1b and v1c, ecruteak, general trade, bunker, and delfino plaza
 
 
As for my opinion keep the night one and b3
 
 
 
Edit: also as tatost said this poll should be redone. It's filled with inaccuracies. B3 is the classic, first of all. And we should be voting to remove one only, not keep one only, since b3 is different enough, well liked, and has history on our server (pokemon was 24/7 b3 for years)

The creator you speak of is @ColdEndeavour . He created enju, kogane, v1b and v1c, ecruteak, general trade, bunker, and delfino plaza
 
 
As for my opinion keep the night one and b3
 
 
 
Edit: also as tatost said this poll should be redone. It's filled with inaccuracies. B3 is the classic, first of all. And we should be voting to remove one only, not keep one only, since b3 is different enough, well liked, and has history on our server (pokemon was 24/7 b3 for years)

Ori plz

-1 has been an elaborate kypari alt all along. You can't fool me.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Jk +1 he's been around forever

-1 has been an elaborate kypari alt all along. You can't fool me.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Jk +1 he's been around forever

+1 still active enough and mature enough for member and has shown dedication to the clan.
 
A9
M7
 
 
I know Zuko wronged us, but he's matured. Give my boy his honor back.

Neutral for now but I DO have a spare huntsman. Fresh price of 2 scrap my dude you can't find deals like this.

Ayy so I'm active and committed again. I had spent the last month or so basically depressed about being housebound with my broken leg, and honestly just didn't feel in the mood to play.
 
 
BUT...
 
 
AFTER THIS TERRIBLE FUCKING WEEK...
 
I've finally realized how silly I was being. Basically, I sprained my only functioning ankle and have been stuck in bed, barely able to move. I couldn't even drag my chair ten feet with the sprained leg. I've been taunted by my computer across the room but couldn't get close without crawling on my hands and knees. Today I've been able to reasonably move again finally and am over any depression, one leg is a godsend. As for why I'm only posting now, I just woke up an hour ago...at 7 pm... I've been sleeping most of my days and am going to need to get over that, but I'm back and feeling way better. Expect 2014 activity I'm hyped.

A damn good title for a damn good price

The way I see it, gaming related and not broken are MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS, not automatic grounds for a spot on the server. This idea that whoever made the thread just wants it gone for personal reasons is pretty dumb. I see it as the same type of argument as hating on people for less than stellar posts to get to 50, what are they supposed to do? If multiple people think a map is bad, and not up to our servers standards, whether that map is complete and bug free or not really doesn't matter. And besides, outside of clear personal favoritism and begging higher ups outside of the forums, starting a discussion around whether or not we should have a map is perfectly valid. For any reason. It's a community vote, not one persons opinion.
 
3dland is generally disliked. Groans flood voice chat whenever it gets picked, and I think it's telling that your argument is "we shouldn't remove maps we dislike" instead of bringing up a single positive thing about the map. If the map can't be defended on the merits, and only on what is basically procedural grounds, then it should be removed.
 
Tl;dr: the map is bad, fairly objectively. it may be complete, but it's bad. If you want it gone, say why. If you want it to stay, defend it on its merits. But if all you can say is "we shouldn't remove maps the community as a majority dislikes" then nah fam, we should.
 
+1 for removal