realBelloWaldi

Uber Upgrades, during when Tuna was still mod, whenever I killed him, I spammed "lel". Instead of warning me, he proceeded to get upset at me and near insult me downright, infront of other servergoers.
Pokemon Trade, before he was mod. Being disrespectful to many players that killed him and was unpleasing to be around.
As I said, he has definitely changed and I'm more than settled on giving him a positive vouch. Examples seem unnecissary when I'm intent on being positive.
Also, what grammatical error is there in my post? If you want to give me bad ratings to lower my rank, at least be upfront about it.

Closing this thread, it's legit the pot calling the kettle black from both sides. Everyone who has complained about the other person is either uninformed, or guilty of the exact same thing. 

You guys need to stop arguing, constructive criticism is completely okay though, but not everything has to be argumentative. The staff and TF2 players aren't going out of their way to hate on Tuna or his friend group, and Tuna's friend group are not going out of their way to cause chaos. Cliques will always be a thing in all aspects of life, especially a gaming community. You do not have to like someone to show them respect or to receive it.
~Closed

I'm not a furry ?

Locking for a bit since the responses already arent looking good. brb

probably one of the dumbest introductions ive ever read on here but i've always considered you a "good kid" that never caused issues and wasn't - even for his age - annoying.
now you have a deep voice and itd be kinda rude to refer to you as a kid, but +1 from me due to the past experiences i had with you. oneglove has been around for so long, and as stated above, he was quite the opposite of a troublemaker. always pretty friendly and helped to populate dead servers

jesus christ do you guys seriously think people would wanna humiliate themselves for a few credits (or whatever the prize is gonna be)?
i dont mean to be disrespectful but isnt the challenge supposed to be embarassing? do you really think you'd get any entries?

jesus christ do you guys seriously think people would wanna humiliate themselves for a few credits (or whatever the prize is gonna be)?
i dont mean to be disrespectful but isnt the challenge supposed to be embarassing? do you really think you'd get any entries?

This is basically what I think everyone is thinking when I look at this thread

jesus christ do you guys seriously think people would wanna humiliate themselves for a few credits (or whatever the prize is gonna be)?
i dont mean to be disrespectful but isnt the challenge supposed to be embarassing? do you really think you'd get any entries?

✋

jesus christ do you guys seriously think people would wanna humiliate themselves for a few credits (or whatever the prize is gonna be)?
i dont mean to be disrespectful but isnt the challenge supposed to be embarassing? do you really think you'd get any entries?

jesus christ do you guys seriously think people would wanna humiliate themselves for a few credits (or whatever the prize is gonna be)?
i dont mean to be disrespectful but isnt the challenge supposed to be embarassing? do you really think you'd get any entries?

no worries, the fidget spinner will do it for me

Hi guys, it's Synx/VWK/Nova. I was Syn/Trollface/d0x/Asa's fiance. He lived with me for the last 5 years.. Sadly he passed away on the 19th of May to an unknown cause. Currently we're still investigating what it could be. I've been devastated ever since, and I wanted to make sure all of you guys that were a part of his life knew of his passing. Thank you all so much for all the fond memories. 

I believe the choice here is very self-evident due to the detailed description @fink gave in his ban protest.
Not only does he regret what he has done, he is also genuinely sorry for it.
Definitely a +1 from me. Should be unbanned immediately. Love seeing real change in people.

Okay so, the dodgeball plugin we had was complete butt. Dodgeball should be out of the question unless you can get a plugin on par with the Disc-FF server.
BHOP in TF2 is kind of stupid imo.
Skill Surf and MGE are my top two picks, but if we get an MGE server it's not going to be any different than any of the other hundreds that are already out there.

We've had the map on not even a day. Chill.

Thank you James, very cool!

Can't understand why this thread was downvoted so much. Granted, I don't play on the servers anymore, but that was already a somewhat "controversial" rule when I was DL.
I've never been a fan of that rule since I actually think it's quite stupid. I had my best times in xG on Jailbreak, a server that is based on people using voice chat. Imagine if you were to strictly make sure only one person is talking on mic. That would ruin most of the fun, to be honest, since while the gamemode itself is pretty mediocre, the community part of it was fun. The interactions with 20+ people were what made it quite unique and of course it happens that people talk over each other.
I think this is more of a common sense thing (haha @Kypari ? ). If there's two people talking and they accidently interrupt each other, nobody needs a staff member saying "GUYS! ONLY ONE PERSON ON MIC!". If someone is talking to someone through voice chat and another person happens to join during that situation and is like "hey guys, what's up", there's no need to enforce that certain rule. Another scenario that is a bit more elaborate: If someone would tell the server a story of how we walked his dog and some other dog almost attacked him, and someone interrupts asking a question relevant to the topic, (i.e. "what breed was the dog that attacked you) on voice chat, then I don't think anyone needs to do anything about it.
If, however, someone is purposely disturbing a conversation to "troll/harass" someone, that's a different case where a staff member should take action.
That being said, I don't think you can make rules that cover every situation possible. There are several cases where that rule makes no sense at all, but there are also cases where it would make sense. Staff has to do some thinking sometimes.
Still kinda dumb to give @maf427, an active player on the servers last time I checked, so many bad ratings tbh. He made a very reasonable and constructive* thread imo, but at the end I'll just have to agree to disagree with these people.
 
* EDIT: Maybe not the way he worded it, but the point he's making.

Can't understand why this thread was downvoted so much. Granted, I don't play on the servers anymore, but that was already a somewhat "controversial" rule when I was DL.
I've never been a fan of that rule since I actually think it's quite stupid. I had my best times in xG on Jailbreak, a server that is based on people using voice chat. Imagine if you were to strictly make sure only one person is talking on mic. That would ruin most of the fun, to be honest, since while the gamemode itself is pretty mediocre, the community part of it was fun. The interactions with 20+ people were what made it quite unique and of course it happens that people talk over each other.
I think this is more of a common sense thing (haha @Kypari ? ). If there's two people talking and they accidently interrupt each other, nobody needs a staff member saying "GUYS! ONLY ONE PERSON ON MIC!". If someone is talking to someone through voice chat and another person happens to join during that situation and is like "hey guys, what's up", there's no need to enforce that certain rule. Another scenario that is a bit more elaborate: If someone would tell the server a story of how we walked his dog and some other dog almost attacked him, and someone interrupts asking a question relevant to the topic, (i.e. "what breed was the dog that attacked you) on voice chat, then I don't think anyone needs to do anything about it.
If, however, someone is purposely disturbing a conversation to "troll/harass" someone, that's a different case where a staff member should take action.
That being said, I don't think you can make rules that cover every situation possible. There are several cases where that rule makes no sense at all, but there are also cases where it would make sense. Staff has to do some thinking sometimes.
Still kinda dumb to give @maf427, an active player on the servers last time I checked, so many bad ratings tbh. He made a very reasonable and constructive* thread imo, but at the end I'll just have to agree to disagree with these people.
 
* EDIT: Maybe not the way he worded it, but the point he's making.

only pisses off the people who hog mic like dweebs
If this wasn't ever a rule, I would have gone completely deaf. I'm exaggerating here, and I'm sure you've already realized that.
It's incredibly annoying to have some dufus speak over you every time you try to speak. Without the rule, the annoyance of being spoken over will be multiplied until we've reached a clusterfudge on the mic.
I would also like to add that traders and staff can't get on the mic when you people won't let up for a split second, it's ridiculous. The staff members and traders have a much better reason to be on the mic than the ten others speaking on the mic in a mesh of ERP, slurs, and memes.
There is a difference between being on a server and going to a party. At a party, there are plenty of side-conversations going on in different sections of the room, whereas on a server everything is right there in your ears. Much easier to overlook the much quieter conversation from the other side of the room compared to someone whispering sweet nothings in your ear.
This is where common courtesy comes into play. When you hear another person speaking, you stop. If they also stop, you either start back up again or you say "go ahead fam." Latency has nothing to do with two or more people speaking right on top of each other for a solid ten seconds.
I can see why some people might dislike the rule, but it's a pretty simple concept to grasp. Sorry, yellow hat glasses : (

Can't understand why this thread was downvoted so much. Granted, I don't play on the servers anymore, but that was already a somewhat "controversial" rule when I was DL.
I've never been a fan of that rule since I actually think it's quite stupid. I had my best times in xG on Jailbreak, a server that is based on people using voice chat. Imagine if you were to strictly make sure only one person is talking on mic. That would ruin most of the fun, to be honest, since while the gamemode itself is pretty mediocre, the community part of it was fun. The interactions with 20+ people were what made it quite unique and of course it happens that people talk over each other.
I think this is more of a common sense thing (haha @Kypari ? ). If there's two people talking and they accidently interrupt each other, nobody needs a staff member saying "GUYS! ONLY ONE PERSON ON MIC!". If someone is talking to someone through voice chat and another person happens to join during that situation and is like "hey guys, what's up", there's no need to enforce that certain rule. Another scenario that is a bit more elaborate: If someone would tell the server a story of how we walked his dog and some other dog almost attacked him, and someone interrupts asking a question relevant to the topic, (i.e. "what breed was the dog that attacked you) on voice chat, then I don't think anyone needs to do anything about it.
If, however, someone is purposely disturbing a conversation to "troll/harass" someone, that's a different case where a staff member should take action.
That being said, I don't think you can make rules that cover every situation possible. There are several cases where that rule makes no sense at all, but there are also cases where it would make sense. Staff has to do some thinking sometimes.
Still kinda dumb to give @maf427, an active player on the servers last time I checked, so many bad ratings tbh. He made a very reasonable and constructive* thread imo, but at the end I'll just have to agree to disagree with these people.
 
* EDIT: Maybe not the way he worded it, but the point he's making.

Can't understand why this thread was downvoted so much. Granted, I don't play on the servers anymore, but that was already a somewhat "controversial" rule when I was DL.
I've never been a fan of that rule since I actually think it's quite stupid. I had my best times in xG on Jailbreak, a server that is based on people using voice chat. Imagine if you were to strictly make sure only one person is talking on mic. That would ruin most of the fun, to be honest, since while the gamemode itself is pretty mediocre, the community part of it was fun. The interactions with 20+ people were what made it quite unique and of course it happens that people talk over each other.
I think this is more of a common sense thing (haha @Kypari ? ). If there's two people talking and they accidently interrupt each other, nobody needs a staff member saying "GUYS! ONLY ONE PERSON ON MIC!". If someone is talking to someone through voice chat and another person happens to join during that situation and is like "hey guys, what's up", there's no need to enforce that certain rule. Another scenario that is a bit more elaborate: If someone would tell the server a story of how we walked his dog and some other dog almost attacked him, and someone interrupts asking a question relevant to the topic, (i.e. "what breed was the dog that attacked you) on voice chat, then I don't think anyone needs to do anything about it.
If, however, someone is purposely disturbing a conversation to "troll/harass" someone, that's a different case where a staff member should take action.
That being said, I don't think you can make rules that cover every situation possible. There are several cases where that rule makes no sense at all, but there are also cases where it would make sense. Staff has to do some thinking sometimes.
Still kinda dumb to give @maf427, an active player on the servers last time I checked, so many bad ratings tbh. He made a very reasonable and constructive* thread imo, but at the end I'll just have to agree to disagree with these people.
 
* EDIT: Maybe not the way he worded it, but the point he's making.

this rule is absolutely and indubitably pathetic and retarded, especially when it occurs in a populous server (surf and tgh at this point). it disappoints me when everybody talks at once and many of staff go apepoop, and as time passes it gets crazier. it happens all of the time when a discussion is currently taking place. either everybody talking at once comes to the epiphany that they're all talking over each other and they all hesistate, which stops the talking, or the people will commence the talking, and in this case, it wreaks havoc. better to not have it as a server rule to give people more freedom while talking on the mic, which brings a more social and friendly atmosphere, and to further shun the staff from having such a hard time with the ongoing issue. it occurs almost every single day i come on surf, but i'm not sure about tgh regarding the issue. a rule where people are not allowed to talk over each other only makes things worse. let them talk, regardless of the amount of people talking. i don't want to hear "don't talk over people" every minute, which not only pisses people off, but it also delays most of the conversations that the server has, this delay being (x) admin giving a poop and talking in (y) tone that talking over people is not allowed.
imagine going to a huge party. you hear everybody around you talk, the music is loud, and everybody is having a fun time. you're hearing all of this noise, and if people are going to complain about people talking over each other, then maybe you should go outside. some others can view this controversial topic as a "lack of respect" for talking over somebody about to say something, but in a video game, latency exists, and it can't be compensated for when people are talking. this "lack of respect" can be intentional and non-intentional, and i'm sure the most of you guys can tell whether it was on purpose or completely on accident. otherwise, the victim is just being sarcastic.
i understand that servers have their own rules and it's equivalent to going to a night club or any other local area with a myriad of people, but i've never been to any other server that enforces that rule, and if i see any reason being because the server is more unique that way, i'm going to cry.

-1 Immature, causes a lot of controversy