Kypari

Make butts allowed again.  I want my 300+ sexually suggestive sprays to be usable.

You don't have to leave the community even if you don't play on TF2 or relate to xG at the moment. We have members back from 2011 who randomly come back years later and they are still a member, so you don't have to lose member in case you decide to come back ever (which you have in the past too)

Doesn't sound like abuse to me personally. Just sounds like you being a troll. i HATE trolls.
@Tekage and I'm going to @VinylScratch since she is the only female staff member
 

?

Could be the website you used. I use this because the first website that shows up when you google steam id finder doesn't work 50% of the time
Steam ID Finder
STEAMID.XYZ Steam ID Finder - is an online tool that finds and converts steam id by community ID / steamID / steamID32 / steamID64 / URL / steamID3  

Could be the website you used. I use this because the first website that shows up when you google steam id finder doesn't work 50% of the time
Steam ID Finder
STEAMID.XYZ Steam ID Finder - is an online tool that finds and converts steam id by community ID / steamID / steamID32 / steamID64 / URL / steamID3  

Due to the extensiveness of the rules broken, we have decided to ban @Red for a month and he does not lose member, but definitely keep in mind that further rules broken may lead to a perm or membership being revoked
-Closed

Tricking staff into thinking you're hacking is not funny. It's trolling and there's nothing else to it.
I already made a thread about this, but the fact that you purposely try to make people think you're hacking by using scripts and such to appear as botlike as possible does NOT mean that our staff don't know how to spot a hacker. This is mostly on you.
 

Due to the extensiveness of the rules broken, we have decided to ban @Red for a month and he does not lose member, but definitely keep in mind that further rules broken may lead to a perm or membership being revoked
-Closed

Due to the extensiveness of the rules broken, we have decided to ban @Red for a month and he does not lose member, but definitely keep in mind that further rules broken may lead to a perm or membership being revoked
-Closed

We could do a halloween movie next month instead or something

Due to the extensiveness of the rules broken, we have decided to ban @Red for a month and he does not lose member, but definitely keep in mind that further rules broken may lead to a perm or membership being revoked
-Closed

?

I'm going purely based off of what I was told happened, not just by red but by sorcerer as well. Sorcerer admitted to me that over mic he intentionally made a situation out of it to egg red on and instigate trouble. I'm not saying either players behavior was acceptable, only that I understand why there was a reaction like that from Red. 
As a side note b/c it doesn't appear this is going to be an issue for red here: I agree with the membership statement, but I would say in general our control of it until this point has been pretty passive (at least for the past year or so as far as I can recall). If we are to reexamine how we revoke membership I don't feel like its fair to throw a member under the bus by having us decide on their ban thread and having them be the guinea pig for a policy. 

I really have no stake in this at all but as a passerby on the activity stream I'd like to +1 this statement.
The policy of withdrawing membership is clearly not well defined, and as it's a fairly significant thing, I'd feel more comfortable with it being a formal process rather than something that came up ad-hoc in a ban req.

I don't personally think it's necessarily out of the question since tatost's situation wasn't nearly as bad as the things that you listed in my opinion, but I would personally say it's definitely worth membership removal since I would not like to have someone who is toxic, racist, a troll (i HATE trolls) and a bully representing the community on our own servers. I'm mostly indifferent towards membership revocation because of his reply to the thread as I've said though ?
He comes onto the server on an alt account which gets rid of his cosmetics and friends, privates his profile, removes his name history all in an attempt to look like a hacker and then uses spinning scripts when he gets kills or such alternatively to just throwing your mouse across the room. I have had quite a few staff members come forward to me about this and some members too, and it's not really based off skill either. Red is a pretty good pubstomper like many other players we have, but his aim only looks shady when coated in all of these factors. It's all in an attempt to bait staff into thinking he's a hacker so he can turn around like "Lol got you staff your staff sucks"

I don't personally think it's necessarily out of the question since tatost's situation wasn't nearly as bad as the things that you listed in my opinion, but I would personally say it's definitely worth membership removal since I would not like to have someone who is toxic, racist, a troll (i HATE trolls) and a bully representing the community on our own servers. I'm mostly indifferent towards membership revocation because of his reply to the thread as I've said though ?
He comes onto the server on an alt account which gets rid of his cosmetics and friends, privates his profile, removes his name history all in an attempt to look like a hacker and then uses spinning scripts when he gets kills or such alternatively to just throwing your mouse across the room. I have had quite a few staff members come forward to me about this and some members too, and it's not really based off skill either. Red is a pretty good pubstomper like many other players we have, but his aim only looks shady when coated in all of these factors. It's all in an attempt to bait staff into thinking he's a hacker so he can turn around like "Lol got you staff your staff sucks"

Tricking staff into thinking you're hacking is not funny. It's trolling and there's nothing else to it.
I already made a thread about this, but the fact that you purposely try to make people think you're hacking by using scripts and such to appear as botlike as possible does NOT mean that our staff don't know how to spot a hacker. This is mostly on you.
 

I wasn't saying I have anything against the spinning. I actually think it's quite funny, hell you've gotten me with it before on surf. I was just pointing out to others that the use of the script in trolling is whats being discussed, not the action it's self!

That statement was directed at @SegFault since he believed your remarks towards sorcerer were solely rested on the situation sorcerer himself caused which makes sense considering seg was only involved after that point. The examples of how you acted to him in the snippets above though occurred well before that is what was being explained. 
Ultimately though whatever reason you may have had to initially dislike him doesn't formulate an excuse to act distastefully in retort any more then excusing it within the lines of "I broke a rule cause he broke a rule".
With what @Chrono tacked on with your behavior on the forums and how that example itself being entirely unprovoked it makes it hard to heartily trust that your actions haven't been mostly abrasive towards others, taking back to the second situation with luxuria it's hard to accept you weren't targeting him in any way when you harked back on that specific situation in a fairly horrendous way.   I do appreciate how you've come forward about all of this but there's sadly no reasoning this kind of behavior. 
How in the hell does owning up after being outed measure up to taking responsibility? While there's situations that he isn't the only person acting poorly to say that's been the case every time in this month long situation is an ignorant stretch. 
Do you understand the purpose of highlighting at all? The chatlogs are available to anyone if you'd like to poke through and defend the things he has said instead of just leaving a passive remark to the validity of him very clearly acting in ways against the rules. A lot of what involved the actions of other people has already been discussed at this point and even in the cases, as already stated, he wasn't the only person acting poorly that doesn't mean that he wasn't still acting poorly nonetheless. 
Now I'm taking this part entirely second hand but I BELIEVE the point of it is that he is effectively trying to purposefully trick and distract staff into suspecting him of cheating, not that he actually is in any manner. In other words an in server variant of a troll calladmin. Now whether this was his intent (I'd honestly assume not) or if it was actually to any extent that would demand valid suspicion from staff compared to obvious joking around, I can't say myself, but that's just explaining why his usage of an alt was being gone into. 

I was purposely baiting staff to calladmin when on my alt account but would begin to use it when i was locked out my main for a few days. I'll take responsibiliy for that even though if i was warned to stop baiting staff i would had done it long ago but to have it addreass here is silly in my option.

Notice how the chatlogs only highlight the worst of only what he’s said to paint an untrue picture rather than the entire convo to highlight others’ faults. It’s just cherrypicking at best. ?

Was I wrong tho ?? 

?

?