virr

Since there wasnt a poll for the last thread made and it was added even though the majority of the votes were negative, heres another one!
 
Poll with be open for a week.
Vote YES if you want the map to be removed.
Vote NO if you want the map to stay.

Since there wasnt a poll for the last thread made and it was added even though the majority of the votes were negative, heres another one!
 
Poll with be open for a week.
Vote YES if you want the map to be removed.
Vote NO if you want the map to stay.

I thought everyone agreed that Edventures V2 was obnoxious and terrible and needed to be removed for said things, only for it to be brought back and then have another removal thread made.
 
1st attempt a year ago -https://xenogamers.com/threads/37986/

It's a shame to think that this thread would even exist after how overwhelmingly negative the previously was received. It just comes off as the communities opinion holding absolutely no value.

Since there wasnt a poll for the last thread made and it was added even though the majority of the votes were negative, heres another one!
 
Poll with be open for a week.
Vote YES if you want the map to be removed.
Vote NO if you want the map to stay.

Since there wasnt a poll for the last thread made and it was added even though the majority of the votes were negative, heres another one!
 
Poll with be open for a week.
Vote YES if you want the map to be removed.
Vote NO if you want the map to stay.

You are the one who are supposed to provide evidence in this case, as you are the one who is making the claim he's immature.
 
Also, stop bringing up @Rejects. His situation is completely unrelated and should be handled as such.

Tatost was never banned for 2 months, he was kicked out. His application follows our guidelines that state the following:
 

 
I'm not sure what you mean by "way he does things". Yes, it is your vouch entirely, but you are basing your vouch on a lot of assumptions that are false.
 
Best of luck on your application @Tatost

+1 Super friendly player and a good friend. Get back in here. :coffee:

I told you to stay, there is no escaping xG. +1
A:8
M:9

You are the one who are supposed to provide evidence in this case, as you are the one who is making the claim he's immature.
 
Also, stop bringing up @Rejects. His situation is completely unrelated and should be handled as such.

You are the one who are supposed to provide evidence in this case, as you are the one who is making the claim he's immature.
 
Also, stop bringing up @Rejects. His situation is completely unrelated and should be handled as such.

Tatost was never banned for 2 months, he was kicked out. His application follows our guidelines that state the following:
 

 
I'm not sure what you mean by "way he does things". Yes, it is your vouch entirely, but you are basing your vouch on a lot of assumptions that are false.
 
Best of luck on your application @Tatost

Tatost was never banned for 2 months, he was kicked out. His application follows our guidelines that state the following:
 

 
I'm not sure what you mean by "way he does things". Yes, it is your vouch entirely, but you are basing your vouch on a lot of assumptions that are false.
 
Best of luck on your application @Tatost

Tatost was never banned for 2 months, he was kicked out. His application follows our guidelines that state the following:
 

 
I'm not sure what you mean by "way he does things". Yes, it is your vouch entirely, but you are basing your vouch on a lot of assumptions that are false.
 
Best of luck on your application @Tatost

Tatost was never banned for 2 months, he was kicked out. His application follows our guidelines that state the following:
 

 
I'm not sure what you mean by "way he does things". Yes, it is your vouch entirely, but you are basing your vouch on a lot of assumptions that are false.
 
Best of luck on your application @Tatost

Tatost was never banned for 2 months, he was kicked out. His application follows our guidelines that state the following:
 

 
I'm not sure what you mean by "way he does things". Yes, it is your vouch entirely, but you are basing your vouch on a lot of assumptions that are false.
 
Best of luck on your application @Tatost

How do you prove that someone is mature though???

You can barely even proof that someone is mature. You can, however, very easily prove that someone is immature. This makes no sense. And once again, I'm asking you to prove that he is immature. Please substantiate your claims.

Once again, I have nothing but respect for what Tatost did in this situation. Unlike 90% of this clan, Tat did confront skeletal directly instead of shittalking him in some discord behind his back. If you see that as harassment, then uh, fair enough.. I'd however like to mention that not confronting people directly alienates xG and just causes new flame wars and drama because people separate themselves into groups.
You should also notice that these are private messages that were probably not meant to be given out publicly. If you wanna call him toxic, please substantiate your claims by showing when and how he has been toxic on our servers. And once again, stop mentioning Rejects, he has nothing to do with this. It's not like Rejects was not promoted because he's too immature, it had completely different reasons that I personally don't entirely agree with but the majority of our higher ups still deem him unfit.

@Giraffes
I don't want to argue too much and I'll try to keep this as respectful as possible, but I disagree with most of your points.

Many people lied about it. All of them have received their punishments. This happened around three months ago and he deserves a second chance. Ever since then Tat and his group of friends have been reporting all of ManlyDucks accounts to me.

What does Rejects have to do with this mod submission?

He has been a member for a month and a regular for around a year. He has shown a lot of commitment and dedication towards the servers.

It is completely @Skeletal's right to dislike tuna and to deem him unfit as admin, but the way he did it was wrong. It was not constructive at all and he should have done it differently if anything. No offense to Skeletal right here but I think that's something we can agree on. If someone makes these kind of posts then people are gonna react to it accordingly. Tatost felt like the way Skeletal expressed his thoughts was wrong and spoke out against it.

You do realize that @Kyuubey is the person who Tatost "harassed", right? I don't think @Aegean and Tat are friends. And I'm 100% sure @ThunderLimes and Tat aren't friends either, yet not even the legend himself ThunderLimes gave him a -1.

A change from what? That one comment he made on Skeletal's thread?

Don't bring @Rejects into this he has literally nothing to do with Tat's mod submission.
Feel free to respond to this @Giraffes but please let's keep this as respectful as we can.
TL;DR I can't agree with this.

After around 15+ hours of work spread across a month or two, it's finally complete. This was a pretty elaborate 1:1 piece commission for Skelly. It depicts requested Pyro and Engineer sets alongside the Skyforged skin for Cross of Brawlhalla. Feels good for this to finally be complete, it was a lot of shading work. Also this was my first piece to include more than one figure, so stepping it up from one to three was a bit of a leap, especially for a 1:1 size ratio. I tried to keep the shading similar between the three figures in this piece, but I have a habit of rapidly changing how I shade across a quick amount of time, and this took quite a while. Hope y'all like it.

You know, I've always thought the hour-perm system was really weird considering in the cs:go div we decide our ban length based on how severe the offense was. That system makes way more sense to me.
 
Currently the tf2 staff believes that bans always go on a set limit of hour->day->month->perm, and to be honest, i was under the same impression until i re-read the staff manual fairly recently. I'm not sure where that predecent was set, but thats currently what they think. Maybe it's time for a refresher of the staff manual?

recent photo of me and the name of the horse i rode was named triggered.

- This one time, when I went to band camp, my cat got on and did something I guess.
- Tinychat days
- Vintage, (NEO WHERE ARE YOU?!)
- Thunderdoug anyone?
- That one time when Cristo kicked VideoGameDunkey for advertising his YouTube channel on our cs:s jailbreak (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=id=e5lGCSx3K4o;t=92)

You know, I've always thought the hour-perm system was really weird considering in the cs:go div we decide our ban length based on how severe the offense was. That system makes way more sense to me.
 
Currently the tf2 staff believes that bans always go on a set limit of hour->day->month->perm, and to be honest, i was under the same impression until i re-read the staff manual fairly recently. I'm not sure where that predecent was set, but thats currently what they think. Maybe it's time for a refresher of the staff manual?