Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 08/28/13 in Posts
-
2 points
Astera xgm - Counter-Strike: Source
Peechis_Jr and one other reacted to MineCrack for a post in a topic
With the logic you used, I don't blame him for calling you a fucking idiot. -
1 point
PolarCoded - Counter-Strike: Source
SpermytheCat reacted to MineCrack for a post in a topic
Kill me now. -
1 point+1 Really cool guy, great to play with on JB, knows motd A:8 M:8
-
1 pointshi son; i been goin skool 3 week and the teaches call me unedecated, i tell em big roy say whatsup
-
1 pointThe staff's job is to moderate the servers and enforce rules, not to baby sit.
-
1 pointWhy should we be the ones to tell you what you can find easily enough on your own in the motd which is located in the css discussion?
-
1 point
xg stumpy - Counter-Strike: Source
Princess_Celest reacted to Forest for a post in a topic
Please provide valid proof when posting a Ban Request. We cannot act on words alone, nor can we rely on "witnesses". You should provide at the very least, picture proof. Video proof would be best, which you can obtain by "demoing" (record [insert name] > stop) or by using third-party recording software (Fraps). #Closed ~ Forgotten in the Lost Woods -
1 point
xg stumpy - Counter-Strike: Source
Princess_Celest reacted to SonicRainbow for a post in a topic
-1 my opinion in life doesnt matter, neither does it on the internet -
1 point
xg stumpy - Counter-Strike: Source
Princess_Celest reacted to diabeetus for a post in a topic
-1. First things first, you have no real proof to support anything that you're claiming. Secondly, someone accusing you of lagging the server isn't a bannable offense at all, it wouldn't really warrant even a gag in my opinion. I looked at the chat logs for stumpy for the past few days, and he only said a racial slur one time, which would be only a gag (depending on the situation). From also checking the chat logs, it seems that you decided to degrade him as well, which doesn't really help your cause at all, as from what I can tell stumpy didn't really do anything to you. Stumpy's chat logs: Rankings | Xeno Gamers T4ze's chat logs: Xeno Gamers - Search -
1 pointIm sorry but ezreal is considered hard to most people because everything is a "skillshot" but imo one of the easiest people to play considering his q does too much damage for being on 2 second cooldown. Wont be fun 1v1's no trading skills and all inning. Just gunna be a poke battle and a race to tower kill or 100 cs
-
1 point
-
1 point@@Gkoo @@John @@Hidingmaster @@DarkWolf6052 @@Forest Can someone close this? Isn't the kid in SNG anyways... shouldn't he be perm from the servers too since SNG is Banned?
-
1 point
Leotekk - Counter-Strike: Source
Leotekk reacted to Majestic_Narwha for a post in a topic
+1 hes a pretty cool dude A:5 M:8 -
1 pointI'm pretty sure if this was prison we wouldn't have freedays, murdering people for jumping last, forcing other prisoners to kill each other in death soccer, etc. or is it.... dun Dun DUN!
-
1 pointI hope everyone considers the doors on lunar if they are going to +1.
-
1 point
Taking a break
Cloud reacted to Princess_Celest for a post in a topic
Thank The Lord for the education system! -
1 point
Taking a break
Priggles reacted to MagicalPurple for a post in a topic
I'm in 8th grade and school starts in 7 days -
1 point
-
1 pointwhy is ezreal even a choice.
-
1 point
Teamkilling as a Prisoner
Lemons reacted to xGShadowSpy for a post in a topic
-1... Teamkilling was never allowed and shouldn't be allowed. Once you allow teamkilling, you allow a T killing EVERYONE on a map like parabellum in the freedom pit trap and wardens can put them there on purpose for the other T once it's allowed, and all it's gonna do is piss off the players who just lost their round. It might be fun looking at it from the view of the person teamkilling someone, but all it will do is cause problems, people will get pissed if they're constantly teamkilled because we all know once this rule is put in place people will do it all the time. -
1 point
Teamkilling as a Prisoner
Lemons reacted to DarkWolf6052 for a post in a topic
Still though, CTs can't do it, I know this states for Ts. -
1 point
John Wilks Boothe - Counter-Strike: Source
WhyJewMad reacted to Warriorsfury for a post in a topic
You give us enough proof to forum ban you. At least we got something good out of this. -
0 points
Who thinks I should buy PM?
DrLee reacted to Majestic_Narwha for a post in a topic
If I went back to being more active on jailbreak, minigames, and surf, do you think I should get payed moderator? I am on jailbreak in the early morning a lot and that's when the little kids and rulebreakers are on, and staff arent on when the trolls show up most of the time, I wanna help fill the leaks -
0 points
-
0 pointsDivision: Counter-Strike: Source In-Game Name: xg stumpy Offender's Steam ID: xg stumpy Rules Broken: Freekilling on multiple counts. falsly acusing of lagging server on purpose <failspelling>. And racial slurs. Evidence: Ask anyone on the server. besides stumpy of course :3
-
0 points
xg stumpy - Counter-Strike: Source
Princess_Celest reacted to gloryguy for a post in a topic
-1 how doesnt one person "lag the server" yes he freekills but he slays himself after he does. -
-1 pointsshadow you weren't even in the server, not sure what you think you're doing I was retard, I was in there with them, so stfu retard. lol god you are a bigger optistic retard than I was. wow do you eat fucking rocks kid, what is optistic? lol look at this kid trying to be an internet bully @@Shadow1226
-
-1 points
Taking a break
Ebic reacted to Rhododendron for a post in a topic
That's pretty harsh bro. Seriously you better calm down otherwise I will ban you and your sister. I'm sawwy mashta Now do my bidding: -
-1 points
Olympia
HaplessIdiot reacted to Dudeeman123 for a post in a topic
:afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::afro::tarin::tarin::tarin::tarin::llama::llama::llama::llama::llama::llama::llama::llama::llama::llama::llama::llama::llama: -
-1 points
John - Counter-Strike: Source
Tsuchikure reacted to John for a post in a topic
I agree with Hidingmaster. To keep it fair make it 3-4 weeks. As he stated most people wait. I was going to wait originally but I figured I might as well post it now and if it was agreed on make it a reduced ban by any amount of time. -
-1 points
John - Counter-Strike: Source
Tsuchikure reacted to John for a post in a topic
Division: Counter-Strike: Source In-Game Name: xG:DM | John Wilkes Booth Steam ID: STEAM_0:0:12099893 Information: Never thought I'd have to make one of these. The map was Canyondam and we were doing the number line wall. The warden had put the number 7 into CT chat to die and then soon after put the number 4. However, I didn't hear over the T's yelling that we were redoing the game. Thus meaning only number 4 was supposed to die. This isn't for an immediate unban. This is for a shortened banned. Only 3 t's died in the process. And I of course banned myself. It was an honest mistake as many of you know I wouldn't just mass for the hell of it. @@Kirigaya_Kazuto was there. He can vouch that it was an accident and not an intentional mass freekill. -
-3 pointsTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes Rule Tunnel Snakes Rule Tunnel Snakes Rule Tunnel Snakes Rule Tunnel Snakes Rule Tunnel Snakes Rule Tunnel Snakes Rule Tunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes RuleTunnel Snakes Rule Tunnel Snakes Rule