Leaderboard

I'll say again what good is server population when it's full of people who make others uncomfortable and would lead to us actually losing population because people don't want to be near them. What good is silencing someone when it has clearly had no effect on them before. Banning someone is the most clear way to outright avoid having someone like this on the server and to get the message across that we don't want people to behave like this around, both to them and anyone else.

He honestly just seems to like confrontation. If you let him know he's getting under your skin you're giving him attention and that validates him because that's his goal. I honestly don't think we should even really ban him, he's just another body on the server most of the time. If we really want we should just silence him for longer and longer periods of time and if all he wants to come on to do is shit-talk he'll soon stop returning. Otherwise he's keeping the servers populated while unable to start shit or will learn to stop starting shit, which is the best of both worlds

Division Team Fortress 2 In-Game Name Bonfire Offender's Identity Sucy the Mushroom Ban Type Server Ban Explanation and Evidence Ever since Sucy first started playing on tgh he's always been at the center of heated arguments on the server. Every time he's on the server he always says very controversial statements. At this point he's saying things like this just to get a rise out of everyone and to make people on the server upset. Right now Sucy is muted for a month, But a problem rises that he can still do what he was muted for in text and it looks like he still has full intent to do what he normally does but instead of over the mic he just says it in chat which still creates the same problem. In my opinion, the only way we can tell him to stop acting like this is a ban of some sort. He just joins the server to upset people and cause controversy.

+1 for week ban. Every time I'm on with him he always creates an argument of some sorts. Doesn't matter the topic, he will find a way to argue it. And there is always somebody on the server he ends up pissing off for doing what he does. We constantly told him to stop arguing and he would just end up starting again immediately after we told him to stop. I would't say he deserves a perma ban, but one of the big bois needs to talk to him on steam and tell him to stop.

192.99.237.157:11775 is the server! If anyone wants to manage it and upload custom maps or whatever, I can spin up more and give access out.

+1 for a week ban, because it's honestly not worth of a perm. Maybe he needs to cool down a bit, but other than that it looks like he is trying to be more edgy and toxic rather than disrespectful. Also with the ban, maybe someone message him letting him know the reason and extent of the ban, as well as what will happen if he continues. A new approach to bans may not be so bad ?

I don't necessarily understand why people are pushing for a permanent ban on this guy over a bit of BM in chat. It doesn't even look like what he said was actually directed at anyone, and simply general opinions on "furries" themselves. The kids like 14 or 15 and it's really obvious he just wants attention. I agree with Elcark, 1 week is plenty enough for something like this.

RIP. Shout out to the old days when you, @Bello, and I played GTA and had a good time. I'll miss those days the most. Good luck, fam. If I'm ever free and want to play DotA, just hit me up.

-1 Just because you don't like the map doesn't mean we should remove it. There's nothing functionally wrong with the map itself. If we were to get rid of all the maps that encourage a limited style of play, we would have to get rid of maps like bunker, jollyroger, darktower, seabed and more. Many of our regular players enjoy playing the map anyways and just because you don't like getting sniped from spawn means it should be removed.

He literally cannot communicate with other people in this situation, I don't know how him just being around without being able to talk over the mic or text chat with anyone would be "uncomfortable". And we really need to be careful what we claim we're doing what for, it's dangerous to be as vague as "oh well he needs to be banned because he's making people uncomfortable" because plenty of things could hypothetically make people uncomfortable. Plenty of things many people here do or are into for instance Whatever ultimately happens to Sucy should, one, make sense for his offense, two, actually solve the root problem of the offense, and three, ideally not be something that'll bite us in the ass later in any way. I would consider just banning server regulars for their interactions with their peers a bad idea, especially when their offenses aren't really related to in-game abuse of any kind, and they aren't specifically singling out individual players. I'm personally a little more inclined to not bring the ban hammer down full force on him because he just seems more like an idiot kid trying to be edgy to look cool in front of his generally more mature peers, as opposed to being a genuinely malicious actor, but you know, whatever, he's been warned before. But I'd still recommend that whatever decision is made affect his ability to negatively communicate with our other server regulars rather than just affect his ability to play on the servers completely, be it a three-month silence/perma silence + perma gag or whatever.