-
Content Count
1392 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
31
Reputation Activity
-
Hidingmaster reacted to Tsuchikure in Time To Move On
Bleed's answer: valve broke everything and working on super secret project coming out soon
Chrono's answer: niggers, also work
can confirm they told me using mind powers in my sleep
-
Hidingmaster got a reaction from realBelloWaldi in Hachi
Also, keep the thread mature and respectful. Don't take a sharp turn to drive it off the cliff either. Seriously.
-
Hidingmaster got a reaction from Lithium in Time To Move On
This is up to @Bleed and @Chrono since it's csgo.
-
Hidingmaster got a reaction from Matsi in Stickz, Vertex - Nuclear Dawn
Yeah... I don't see the problem here. As far as I understood, he was just pointing out some poor server performance/config. You don't have to take his advice either. (Which it sounds like pretty sound advice to me).
Closed.
-
Hidingmaster got a reaction from DrLee in Organization
And what have we learned today kids?
That the "edit silently" option is the biggest load of crap. Also is the biggest lie in the history of internets.
-
Hidingmaster got a reaction from Vector in Organization
And what have we learned today kids?
That the "edit silently" option is the biggest load of crap. Also is the biggest lie in the history of internets.
-
Hidingmaster got a reaction from Yu_Narukami in Organization
Yeah. You think these are good ideas? Then do them yourself. Lazy CL's that don't do their job (AKA FOREST).
Oh yeah, and the rules section needs a serious overhaul. AKA I agree.
-
Hidingmaster got a reaction from diabeetus in Ban Policy Reform?
There has always been the idea that the punishments should go: warn > kick > ban. I think this is quite effective, limits the amount of bans that go unjustified, and give the person 2 chances at changing behavior before any more lasting punishments are issued (plus the warning gets logged and can be used as evidence in any ban protests). The only time bans should be the first choice is in cases of RDM, freekilling, or hacking; everything else should warrant a warning.
In my opinion, getting told to F off or one of many other insults is not enough to ban somebody. If I was ever confronted with one of those characters, i would silence them for a round or two; this generally took care of the problem.
There isn't a problem with the current system, but rather moderators and administrators that think they can ban whoever, whenever. This is not the case, and as you said it should only be reserved for the worst offenders.
Also, silencing someone for a week is way to long imo. I would limit it to at most a day. Anyone who wants to continue being an arse hole after being silenced for a day doesn't deserve to play on our servers.
-
Hidingmaster got a reaction from Moosty in Suggestion: Sourceban Accounts For Staff
Here's why I think the current system is good:
A mod bans someone perm. They realize that they messed up. Currently they have to contact a higher up to fix the ban. This contact does 2 things
1) Makes the mod be accountable of their mistake, publicly to a person in power
2) Allows a higher up the knowledge of the mistake.
-
Hidingmaster got a reaction from diabeetus in Suggestion: Sourceban Accounts For Staff
Here's why I think the current system is good:
A mod bans someone perm. They realize that they messed up. Currently they have to contact a higher up to fix the ban. This contact does 2 things
1) Makes the mod be accountable of their mistake, publicly to a person in power
2) Allows a higher up the knowledge of the mistake.
-
Hidingmaster got a reaction from Waimalu in Suggestion: Sourceban Accounts For Staff
Here's why I think the current system is good:
A mod bans someone perm. They realize that they messed up. Currently they have to contact a higher up to fix the ban. This contact does 2 things
1) Makes the mod be accountable of their mistake, publicly to a person in power
2) Allows a higher up the knowledge of the mistake.
-
Hidingmaster got a reaction from realBelloWaldi in Suggestion: Sourceban Accounts For Staff
Actually now that i think about it, allowing everyone to edit their own bans is not a good idea. They can abuse people in the server, run to sourcebans, and fix it.
-
Hidingmaster got a reaction from Nomulous in Suggestion: Sourceban Accounts For Staff
Actually now that i think about it, allowing everyone to edit their own bans is not a good idea. They can abuse people in the server, run to sourcebans, and fix it.
-
Hidingmaster got a reaction from Flareon in Suggestion: Sourceban Accounts For Staff
Actually now that i think about it, allowing everyone to edit their own bans is not a good idea. They can abuse people in the server, run to sourcebans, and fix it.
-
Hidingmaster got a reaction from realBelloWaldi in Suggestion: Sourceban Accounts For Staff
If you can set it up where they only have access to edit their own bans, then by all means we need it. If it's only possible to give them full access, then no way that's happening. Just because people are trusted with powers as mod/admin doesn't mean they won't do something stupid when they leave the clan. We give the powers to a limited number of people to reduce the chances of something bad happening, and sourcebans is a pretty serious thing. I could go in and perm ban every single player, and remove everyone's access to server powers; that's why only a few of us have access.
-
Hidingmaster got a reaction from Kypari in Suggestion: Sourceban Accounts For Staff
If you can set it up where they only have access to edit their own bans, then by all means we need it. If it's only possible to give them full access, then no way that's happening. Just because people are trusted with powers as mod/admin doesn't mean they won't do something stupid when they leave the clan. We give the powers to a limited number of people to reduce the chances of something bad happening, and sourcebans is a pretty serious thing. I could go in and perm ban every single player, and remove everyone's access to server powers; that's why only a few of us have access.
-
Hidingmaster got a reaction from diabeetus in Voting Commands
We looked into implementing this in css back in the day, but decided against it because of the abuse. People can and will abuse it. I think it is a great tool for servers, but only if it is in a way that limits abuse.
What I suggest is give it to all people to use, but limit it to 1 use per connection. The times that someone would actually need multiple casts. Also, I suggest not mentioning to the general population that they get one per connection, reduce the chance of people knowing disconnecting will reset it.
-
Hidingmaster reacted to FirstblooD in Stickz, Vertex - Nuclear Dawn
Division:
Nuclear Dawn Staff Name:
Stickz, Vertex Staff's Steam ID:
STEAM_0:0:7181974 Evidence:
NDix Germany -Really Laggy Server :: Nuclear Dawn General Discussions Further Information:
i still have the responsibility to bring this under your notion, as i think that everybody with an xG tag in front of there name, haz a example funtion.
as there are many ND players feel the same way FB -
-
Hidingmaster got a reaction from DrLee in Videogamedunkey Played On Xg Css Jb.
I mean, at least the mods did their job. amirite?
-
Hidingmaster got a reaction from Dethman in Videogamedunkey Played On Xg Css Jb.
I mean, at least the mods did their job. amirite?
-
Hidingmaster got a reaction from Forest in Videogamedunkey Played On Xg Css Jb.
I mean, at least the mods did their job. amirite?
-
Hidingmaster got a reaction from Warriorsfury in Videogamedunkey Played On Xg Css Jb.
I mean, at least the mods did their job. amirite?
-
Hidingmaster got a reaction from DrLee in Secondary Account Trash-talking
Yeah, using an alt is essentially the same thing as evading a ban. Should receive harsher punishment.
-