LAN_Megalodon

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-tggRh__SE
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8euJOK-KWXQ
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ItRSs983ws
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhVrX6a2LNs
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SthfjxYXTA
 

 
Black/White 1-2 and Hoenn had some of the most laid back melancholic tunes.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-tggRh__SE
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8euJOK-KWXQ
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ItRSs983ws
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhVrX6a2LNs
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SthfjxYXTA
 

 
Black/White 1-2 and Hoenn had some of the most laid back melancholic tunes.

I'm sorry, I don't like getting into arguments here, but I can't with a good conscience support the idea of someone getting a month ban for using binds that some other player didn't like. Especially so in the case of Zack, like I have no problem with the dude, but he doesn't even try to be non-confrontational. He is by one of the most toxic and most dramatic of our semi-regular players, and most of the shit he gives people is almost always completely unprovoked.
 
Additionally calling direct quotes harassment is a real fucking stretch even if the player being quoted in question doesn't like it. Wikipedia pointing out that Michael Richards was in fact an idiot who shouted racially charged slurs via a direct quote isn't "harassment", it's not up to other people to forgive and forget your idiocy and move on. If you said something stupid, you have to correct the record yourself, not just expect other people to drop it.
 
On an unrelated note, I think one of the main reasons other people aren't protesting against Sylux's ban is because he isn't part of any real "in" group. He doesn't have 9 to 13 people in a discord to back him up regardless of what happens, and I do think that people who don't like him (rightly or wrongly) are going to try and use it against him. The best part is, I personally have witnessed other people within in groups trying to target Zack in order to set him off, and I myself was guilty of the same when I didn't really know much about him, which really leaves me no choice but to assume there's some form of bias here.
 
Sylux's supposed previous infractions are months old, and I doubt his intentions in this case were to do anything but swing back. Justifiably so in my opinion. If each party was given a day ban for bickering, whatever, but a month is too much to throw on a single individual regardless of past bans.
 
+1

citations would be nice if you can/are allowed to provide them.

I'm sorry, I don't like getting into arguments here, but I can't with a good conscience support the idea of someone getting a month ban for using binds that some other player didn't like. Especially so in the case of Zack, like I have no problem with the dude, but he doesn't even try to be non-confrontational. He is by one of the most toxic and most dramatic of our semi-regular players, and most of the shit he gives people is almost always completely unprovoked.
 
Additionally calling direct quotes harassment is a real fucking stretch even if the player being quoted in question doesn't like it. Wikipedia pointing out that Michael Richards was in fact an idiot who shouted racially charged slurs via a direct quote isn't "harassment", it's not up to other people to forgive and forget your idiocy and move on. If you said something stupid, you have to correct the record yourself, not just expect other people to drop it.
 
On an unrelated note, I think one of the main reasons other people aren't protesting against Sylux's ban is because he isn't part of any real "in" group. He doesn't have 9 to 13 people in a discord to back him up regardless of what happens, and I do think that people who don't like him (rightly or wrongly) are going to try and use it against him. The best part is, I personally have witnessed other people within in groups trying to target Zack in order to set him off, and I myself was guilty of the same when I didn't really know much about him, which really leaves me no choice but to assume there's some form of bias here.
 
Sylux's supposed previous infractions are months old, and I doubt his intentions in this case were to do anything but swing back. Justifiably so in my opinion. If each party was given a day ban for bickering, whatever, but a month is too much to throw on a single individual regardless of past bans.
 
+1

I'm sorry, I don't like getting into arguments here, but I can't with a good conscience support the idea of someone getting a month ban for using binds that some other player didn't like. Especially so in the case of Zack, like I have no problem with the dude, but he doesn't even try to be non-confrontational. He is by one of the most toxic and most dramatic of our semi-regular players, and most of the shit he gives people is almost always completely unprovoked.
 
Additionally calling direct quotes harassment is a real fucking stretch even if the player being quoted in question doesn't like it. Wikipedia pointing out that Michael Richards was in fact an idiot who shouted racially charged slurs via a direct quote isn't "harassment", it's not up to other people to forgive and forget your idiocy and move on. If you said something stupid, you have to correct the record yourself, not just expect other people to drop it.
 
On an unrelated note, I think one of the main reasons other people aren't protesting against Sylux's ban is because he isn't part of any real "in" group. He doesn't have 9 to 13 people in a discord to back him up regardless of what happens, and I do think that people who don't like him (rightly or wrongly) are going to try and use it against him. The best part is, I personally have witnessed other people within in groups trying to target Zack in order to set him off, and I myself was guilty of the same when I didn't really know much about him, which really leaves me no choice but to assume there's some form of bias here.
 
Sylux's supposed previous infractions are months old, and I doubt his intentions in this case were to do anything but swing back. Justifiably so in my opinion. If each party was given a day ban for bickering, whatever, but a month is too much to throw on a single individual regardless of past bans.
 
+1

I'm sorry, I don't like getting into arguments here, but I can't with a good conscience support the idea of someone getting a month ban for using binds that some other player didn't like. Especially so in the case of Zack, like I have no problem with the dude, but he doesn't even try to be non-confrontational. He is by one of the most toxic and most dramatic of our semi-regular players, and most of the shit he gives people is almost always completely unprovoked.
 
Additionally calling direct quotes harassment is a real fucking stretch even if the player being quoted in question doesn't like it. Wikipedia pointing out that Michael Richards was in fact an idiot who shouted racially charged slurs via a direct quote isn't "harassment", it's not up to other people to forgive and forget your idiocy and move on. If you said something stupid, you have to correct the record yourself, not just expect other people to drop it.
 
On an unrelated note, I think one of the main reasons other people aren't protesting against Sylux's ban is because he isn't part of any real "in" group. He doesn't have 9 to 13 people in a discord to back him up regardless of what happens, and I do think that people who don't like him (rightly or wrongly) are going to try and use it against him. The best part is, I personally have witnessed other people within in groups trying to target Zack in order to set him off, and I myself was guilty of the same when I didn't really know much about him, which really leaves me no choice but to assume there's some form of bias here.
 
Sylux's supposed previous infractions are months old, and I doubt his intentions in this case were to do anything but swing back. Justifiably so in my opinion. If each party was given a day ban for bickering, whatever, but a month is too much to throw on a single individual regardless of past bans.
 
+1

I'm sorry, I don't like getting into arguments here, but I can't with a good conscience support the idea of someone getting a month ban for using binds that some other player didn't like. Especially so in the case of Zack, like I have no problem with the dude, but he doesn't even try to be non-confrontational. He is by one of the most toxic and most dramatic of our semi-regular players, and most of the shit he gives people is almost always completely unprovoked.
 
Additionally calling direct quotes harassment is a real fucking stretch even if the player being quoted in question doesn't like it. Wikipedia pointing out that Michael Richards was in fact an idiot who shouted racially charged slurs via a direct quote isn't "harassment", it's not up to other people to forgive and forget your idiocy and move on. If you said something stupid, you have to correct the record yourself, not just expect other people to drop it.
 
On an unrelated note, I think one of the main reasons other people aren't protesting against Sylux's ban is because he isn't part of any real "in" group. He doesn't have 9 to 13 people in a discord to back him up regardless of what happens, and I do think that people who don't like him (rightly or wrongly) are going to try and use it against him. The best part is, I personally have witnessed other people within in groups trying to target Zack in order to set him off, and I myself was guilty of the same when I didn't really know much about him, which really leaves me no choice but to assume there's some form of bias here.
 
Sylux's supposed previous infractions are months old, and I doubt his intentions in this case were to do anything but swing back. Justifiably so in my opinion. If each party was given a day ban for bickering, whatever, but a month is too much to throw on a single individual regardless of past bans.
 
+1

I'm sorry, I don't like getting into arguments here, but I can't with a good conscience support the idea of someone getting a month ban for using binds that some other player didn't like. Especially so in the case of Zack, like I have no problem with the dude, but he doesn't even try to be non-confrontational. He is by one of the most toxic and most dramatic of our semi-regular players, and most of the shit he gives people is almost always completely unprovoked.
 
Additionally calling direct quotes harassment is a real fucking stretch even if the player being quoted in question doesn't like it. Wikipedia pointing out that Michael Richards was in fact an idiot who shouted racially charged slurs via a direct quote isn't "harassment", it's not up to other people to forgive and forget your idiocy and move on. If you said something stupid, you have to correct the record yourself, not just expect other people to drop it.
 
On an unrelated note, I think one of the main reasons other people aren't protesting against Sylux's ban is because he isn't part of any real "in" group. He doesn't have 9 to 13 people in a discord to back him up regardless of what happens, and I do think that people who don't like him (rightly or wrongly) are going to try and use it against him. The best part is, I personally have witnessed other people within in groups trying to target Zack in order to set him off, and I myself was guilty of the same when I didn't really know much about him, which really leaves me no choice but to assume there's some form of bias here.
 
Sylux's supposed previous infractions are months old, and I doubt his intentions in this case were to do anything but swing back. Justifiably so in my opinion. If each party was given a day ban for bickering, whatever, but a month is too much to throw on a single individual regardless of past bans.
 
+1

+1 there's spots that are clippy but the bigger issue imo is that the spawns are such absolute shite that you might as well just leave as soon as you join

good

I am actually stepping down by the way.
Servers are boring because the people who made them fun rarely play anymore. The good servers are completely or relatively dead now so that is another thing. But the main reason why I'm leaving is because everyone is so goddamn sensitive on ANY server.
Bye haha @bagel (mean breakfast item) @Kypari (don't even know tbh) @Bello (german minion) @virr (swede) @Thunder (weather report) @LAN_Megalodon (shark boy from shark boy and lava girl) @anyoneelse
While you mourn over my parting I will put up a poll

Can we actually not do this? It’s messing up my threads :(
 

Update: Crits have been disabled for all weapons that aren't melee on TGH and Pokemon Trade.

I doodled this out real quick. Red/Blue lines are sniper sight-lines Assuming spawns are placed on the far left/right, each team would have way too easy a time camping the choke just outside each spawn, as there are no alternative routes or flanks. This could be easily solved by converting each of the buildings by each spawn into a sort of "teleport station", for an alternate route to the middle of the map. Even if you don't want a teleporter because it gets people there too fast, consider making maybe underground tunnels or something, because the camping situation would be really bad with only 3/9 classes being able to make it over the trees and avoiding the choke easily. The casino would be a great place to hide secrets and whatnot, as it's close to the middle of the map, and therefore people would naturally fight for it.
 
Anyway, this is just a basic idea of what I was thinking, tell me what you think etc.

I doodled this out real quick. Red/Blue lines are sniper sight-lines Assuming spawns are placed on the far left/right, each team would have way too easy a time camping the choke just outside each spawn, as there are no alternative routes or flanks. This could be easily solved by converting each of the buildings by each spawn into a sort of "teleport station", for an alternate route to the middle of the map. Even if you don't want a teleporter because it gets people there too fast, consider making maybe underground tunnels or something, because the camping situation would be really bad with only 3/9 classes being able to make it over the trees and avoiding the choke easily. The casino would be a great place to hide secrets and whatnot, as it's close to the middle of the map, and therefore people would naturally fight for it.
 
Anyway, this is just a basic idea of what I was thinking, tell me what you think etc.

Ahh I'm not sure how I feel about that. Fresh starts are cool and all but I know I personally have dumped a lot of time and effort into bridgeland (although it is minecraft, literally nothing you do matters). I'll think it over and abstain from voting until then I guess.

So I don't know what this 'sand' thing is, but here's my proposed solution. Inside one of the mazes/obstacle courses/whatevers that you're all wanting, I'll put a secret, even HARDER puzzle, and there, you MIGHT have the chance to hear sand. How's that sound?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_B9znfZ7Ws

this.
:hail::hail::hail::hail:

Literally the only good town brought up tbh
 
 
Also sorry to you children who want "sand" to be part of the music room, but it is literally the most retarded idea to add that to a server where there are pretty much only 3-4 unique maps. It's the most obnoxious song one could ever think of, even more so than the Minecraft parodies that are going around these days.
The music should actually be from Pokemon itself, not just some random shit thrown together. A bunch of music was posted in a thread a while back when Sylux was asking for it. The majority of the good music was posted by @bagel so look at those posts more than the others.
[pkmn] Map Progression + Suggestions | Xeno Gamers
Just gonna tag @Sylux so he can give a little bit of input if he still looks at the forums.

I considered reporting this for a good while

I considered reporting this for a good while

I considered reporting this for a good while

A music room, preferably with "sand", not everyone should be forced to listen to it though, only if you're around the music room.
Also lots of actually good copyrighted music, artists like "The Black Keys" come to mind.
And xG memes everywhere, the "are you insane!?" emote, tatost's head, maybe an image of a duck with the title that says "the dark lord".