×
  • Sign In
  • Sign In



    Or sign in with one of these services

  • Sign Up
Jump to content

realBelloWaldi

Members
  • D
  • Content Count

    3184
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    160

Posts posted by realBelloWaldi


  1. Darn beat me to the other decal tool items. Also are we including profile pictures in this? I would say yes include profile pictures to cover every base for player images, thoughts?

    imo profile pictures could be a bit too much to monitor. while its really obvious when someone has a swastika as profile picture, other things might not be as easy to see.

    im not sure though


  2. That's sounding pretty good to me really, would be odd if we say no racism but allowed swastika signs/sprays and other hate symbols.

    Hate symbols. That was the word I was looking for!

     

    I really liked what @Vexx said, so the new rule would have to include:

    • No private areas/nudity
    • No gore
    • No sexual acts
       
    • No loli sprays (?)
    • No racism/hate symbols

    I came up with something that probably needs to reworded:

    Sprays and Objectors: These two cannot contain any imagery of nudity, private parts, racism, hate symbols and gore whatsoever. Additionally, the implication of sexual acts as well as imagery of underage people being sexualized, drawn or not, is strictly forbidden as well.


  3. So when I go to google and search "what is lolicon" this comes up

    28786-8c7ae1edc9c44ff0a829b07d458204d2.jpg

    uh oh, same!

    agyazo.com_b2bf4370e3d6ce180b9ddc46ebf029c2.png.f91dfd47abe95ce937609f405bd16274.png

    I personally think that's worthy of a perm being as Xerses was kicked out of the clan and permed for posting child porn and we shouldn't let someone off for practically doing the same thing.

    If I may say, the whole Xerses ban was bullshit. He posted a link to a thread where someone later on allegedly posted CP, which is surely disgusting but not his fault.

    I personally don't think CP and drawn little anime girls are the same, but I'm not lawyer.

    When choosing a punishment for the offender, I think it's fair to say that we did not follow any type of protocol, but rather some moral compass if you know what I mean. Any sane human would find the offender's conduct outrages and digusting, hence we jumped straight to a month ban. However, I do think he should get one final chance, as he has never been banned before.

    Porn sprays are not something that is perm banned for, and not even banned for 1 month, they are banned for a day if that and asked to change/not use on the server (increasing amount the more times after as long as they were given a warning and told about it first)

    I do agree with this to a certain extent, but I don't think following a certain protocol is necessary when the alleged person speaks about having sex with children. If the TF2 higher ups all agree that a harsher punishment is appropriate and even get a CM's approval, then I think it's fine.

    That being said, I would love to hear @mrnutty12's input as well.


  4. I didn't mass freekill I killed 1 person and was banned.

    Lmao, I remember you. You're that one friend of J-Dawg or whatever it was. I'm pretty sure you did actually mass freekill.

    I remember that since you were the guy who posted screenshots of a private conversation that you and I had and said I had anger issues.


  5. My old team ban was appealed and this one is from 2015 with 0 info on why i was banned

    This is exactly what I'm talking about.

    Rejects' sourcbans account was accidently deleted a while ago, hence it says "admin deleted". Rejects must have accidently entered no reason, but he I'm 100% sure that he'd only permanently teamban people for mass freekilling - as it's normal on Jailbreak.


  6. Deathrun:

    • Teamswitching is completely disabled. When you join the server, it will automatically assign you to red or blu[e]. Now if you join blu, there's no need to worry, as the deathrun plugin will automatically switch you to red once the current round is over (unless you're death obviously).

    This way, nobody can join spectators either, however, we found a small solution for that.

    There's a plugin that lets you go into spectator by typing a very simple command:

    /ts [name] [team]

    Teams: 1 = spectator, 2 = red, 3 = blue.

    For instance, if I wanted to join spectator, I'd type /ts bello 1. And once I'm done spectating, I'd type /ts bello 2. Simple as that!

    Tagging all staff members:

    @Vexx @Sesh @mrnutty12 @Vector @BonfireCentipede @Vacindak @Vargas @Elcark @ThunderLimes @YeEternalTuna @Bone @Kypari @Ms.Spooks @LemonVolt @TheSupremePatriot @Moosty @sick41057 @NitNat @Natsu @Blizzard @shwash @Hibiki @Spoopy @Amylicious @Thunder @Frusty @Tekage @Matteomax @Krampus


  7. From the demo cappy provided. You can honestly have an argument that he is hacking, it's incredibly suspicious when he snaps to an AFK scout behind a wall. It's also the way he snaps makes it all the more suspicious. Personally, i am support that shining is using some sort of aimbot and wall hack to track players.

     

    -1 for unban because i believe he is hacking from the demo provided based that he snaps to a player behind a wall, even if you knew he was there, there's no reason to snap to a player behind the wall. Also even if the evidence to ban him for aimbot/wall hacks isn't sufficent. i believe keeping him banned is the right thing based upon he's advertising hacks and he's very disrespectful from his chat logs, and from personal experience in meeting him. He also is a very disrespectful in the demo saying slurs and just trolling.

    officially -1ing him as well. not only does it look like he was hacking, it is also very self-evident from his chatlogs that this guy does not belong onto our servers.

    I would urge our staff to take demos in the future so we don't need to have threads with 10+ pages (y).


  8. First 2 Shots I got was when sir capalot was camping in the corner for me so he can test if he was walling. The first shows your targeting him through the wall at first and the second already taking aim showing that your know he's there.

     

    The next 2 shows that capalot hides behind the wall again and you take aim at him again through the wall.

     

    Both scenes were he was camping there the whole time and Shining was not able to see him at all if he was legit.

     

    (next time ill get demo I just forgot that was a thing)

    On the one hand I see how this would prove that he has walls, on the other hand, this COULD be some coincedences, as we don't have anything that gives us a better insight on the context (you say he was walling, he says he wasnt - we have one person's word against another's). A demo should have been taken. Was other staff online that can support your statements @Spoopy?