Kypari

27 minutes ago, Moosty said:

I didn't know it was removed, so I'll just give a conditional +1 which I'll take back if the big nude drawing and consistency with other rules was the reason, because fair.

It was removed because it wasn't gaming history related enough. There was a vote for it a while back

Will be removed ASAP!

-Closed

General

• Disabled the Dragon's Fury's in !friendly (airblast was working)
• Reworded the !duel plugin to be more grammatically accurate
• Added a new donator punishment system. It is now Warn -> Kick -> Day -> Warn -> Week ban + removal of powers
• Added a new !rtd plugin to all servers which have !rtd with various fixes after feedback from before
• !rtd text position has been moved from the center of the screen
• Updated the /happy command to have more updated jokes and phrases
• Thriller taunts have been entirely disabled

TGH & Pokemon Trade

• Spawn-Protection has been fixed

TGH

• trade_minecraft_star_17_fix and koth_delivery_rc4 have been added to the map rotation

Surf

• Removed surf_lullaby_redone_rc1 (bonus ramps did not work + we already have the original version)

Uber Upgrades

• Added pl_goldheist_canyon_v13
• Added cp_hadal_b13a
• Added pl_corrode_rc2
• Added cp_axle_rc1
• Added koth_occult_rc6
• Added spawn-protection
• Rules on Spawncamping have been re-clarified
• Fixed when people would get uber-shield as Medic

FF2

• Fixed !rtd giving you the wrong rolls
• Morshu's Damage on Cannons scaled from 75% less to 50% less

Deathrun

• Disabled the Wrap Asassin's Projectile (activated traps)

Zombie Fortress

• Added /adminspray

I'm much more of a twitch.tv person but I use youtube too. I don't really watch specific youtubers though other than this guy

1. Call Me Kevin - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdoPCztTOW7BJUPk2h5ttXA

+1 Been here a while now and have never had any issues with him

A: 10

M: 8

5 minutes ago, Tekage said:

@Kypari  and I went on holiday/vacation to Portugal recently and we took a cute photo

I'm carrying Kypari

LOOK AT MY TURNTABLE SOCKS THEY'RE SO CUTE DFGIOJDSIKOF

Also let's talk about how me and Tekage are literal opposites from how we dress

Found my Pichu hat when I was digging through my chest of drawers

18 minutes ago, Caleb956 said:

-1 on Eugene

 

-1 on week ban for Brian, I'd rather do a day ban.  I for one don't see any point of doing a week ban, considering he was banned for slurs and then LEAVING, which is why he got day banned in the first place.

I've been over this again and again and again and again

He got banned for slurs and leaving, not he got banned for slurs and then LEAVING. That would make it a week ban since he was banned for slurs in the past. I'm not arguing with you again because it's pretty clear you are adamant on this, but it's been a while since I disagreed so much.

24 minutes ago, Elcark said:

The timeframe for ban decay is an entirely arbitrary number, just to give a more direct indicator for when bans should be considered nullified

Ban decay is a year, it's in the handbook now

7 hours ago, CT_Slay3R said:

What flavor? Also, refrigerated or room temperature?

Cold chocolate pudding:

6 hours ago, Elcark said:

Then there is Brian at the end there. This report isn't directed at him at all, yet he did the much more condemning offense. Looking at his history (https://bans.xenogamers.com/index.php?p=banlist&advSearch=STEAM_0:1:242346823&advType=s)he has been banned before for slurs, though it was tied in with micspam and leaving to avoid punishment. Being itself a single incident that involved a different kind of issue and from some time ago (about 8 months) it's not exactly a good punishment to bridge from, but unlike Eugene he still has had punishment for this before and should probably receive more then just a warning (more so considering the manner in which it was done). At that, I'd say a day mute would be adequate for the situation here.

We have ban decay for a reason, and that is so that we can punish people appropriately depending on how long ago since their last ban. In this case, ban decay is not in effect, and since he has been banned for the exact same reason (minus the cherry on top micspam), it would certainly be a week ban. We also don't do extended mutes/gags for minor things like slurs, but rather for things like bad mics. I would not be as opposed to an extended mute had he not been banned before. Because of this and the lack of evidence and history for Eugene:

-1 For Eugene

+1 Week ban for Brian

Pudding!! wow!!

2 minutes ago, Caleb956 said:

As always, have a vote if it's to do with removing the map, otherwise we can put a rule in place for spawnkilling if they dont want it removed. 

On 8/19/2018 at 4:41 PM, mrnutty12 said:

I'd still say have a vote, it technically doesn't effect much to keep it, so I'd leave it up to the community in the end whether or not we remove such maps. Particularly because nobody cares enough about uu generally to make a remove thread.

I mean we hardly get enough traffic on uber upgrades as it is. We'll just have people who don't play on uber-upgrades downvoting it. Doesn't really make much sense to make a vote for it considering no-one plays on it. Not everything needs a vote. If it's a problem then we can deal with it ourselves.

New !rtd plugin has been fixed and re-added.

-Closed

helo tekage

Congrats on staff again

-Closed

Unfortunately, your application has been denied.

Note: Your activity is far too inconsistent to consider you for staff right now.

-Closed

Changed the spawncamping rule on Uber Upgrades to be more about shooting into spawn on cp_orange_x3. However, it would maybe make more sense to remove the rule entirely and remove cp_orange_x3 too. Thoughts? I would say a vote here is necessary since we are literally creating a singular rule for one specific map which adds pointless rules to the motd. Community votes would be more for removing a map that the community doesn't like.

8 minutes ago, SegFault said:

Also, you need at least 50 forum posts to apply. Try and get a bit more involved, and in no time you'll get the posts! (Just don't grave dig dead posts or spam please!)

-Closed

8 minutes ago, BonfireCentipede said:

why   : ( 

Go eat some real food instead of chicken nuggies, sausages and battered cod

Not even had a pizza smfh

13 minutes ago, Elcark said:

First off, could you prove that? Otherwise there's not much reason to assume it's true. 

Secondly then he'll just get banned again, simple as that. This is about giving a second chance and if he chooses to fuck it up again that's his choice, but since he already spent a fair amount of time banned he should be able to have that choice. 

Considering his history, it's not out of the question. However, I agree in giving a second chance since most people don't come back to actually have that second chance if they get banned in the first place. If he breaks rules then he just gets banned again and won't get unbanned
+1

Beef is my favourite meat, turkey is my least. Doesn't make them bad though, but I'd rather pass on turkey more often than the other meats

11 minutes ago, VinylScratch said:

The thing is most of these have developed new meanings and are not taken as insults by anyone. A few of these words are currently banned and a few more of them I can agree on banning. This list is not all things that are offensive but could be in some context. I would support banning autistic as an insult or midget, or Vegetable (window licker though hmm). These are words that hurt people, and really a general "No slurs, no derogatory slang" rule would work great. But I feel coming down and nitpicking that  "oh  my great aunts best friends sister found this offensive" does not help the case as the words we are discussing her do have a strong negative presence in today's society and I think we should have a tighter rein on them

We're trying too hard at this point. There's literally no benefit to banning people from saying words like autistic or other such words unless they specifically offend people, and that's basically the whole premise for the word faggot too.