Caleb956

You have been denied from becoming a member, but you may reapply in a month!

Closed~

User will not be unbanned.

-closed

I use the HyperX Cloud IIs and a Blue Snowball for my microphone

Agent 12, this is getting more serious than I had previously anticipated.. perhaps it is time for our secret weapon?

I also have the Logitech g502! It's a great mouse

You have been denied from becoming a member, but you may reapply in a month!

Closed~

9 hours ago, Elcark said:

So taking a look at this step by step, he was previous gagged and muted for this behavior, and repeated it now here. So the next step would be to kick him and then go into a ban. Now considering how it occurred between him leaving and how excessive his behavior was the ban seems like a fair punishment to address it, but why would it be for any longer than this for his first ban?

These chat logs are what occurred before his ban and in all consideration what lead to him receiving it, but with exactly that in mind he received his punishment for how he was last night via that ban. There's no reason to add on to that when he has already been punished for it.

Same as what Elcark said.

-1

demoknight

27 minutes ago, Jacklyn said:

I don't think I deserve this long of a punishment for just chiming in at the start and poking some harmless fun at Moo. 

The fact of the matter is, is that you did it, even if it was meant as harmless fun, the person who reported you clearly didn't, nor did others in this situation, so punishment will be dealt accordingly.  And I will also say, from what I've been able to gather and see myself, this isn't the first time you have been reported for toxicity, so it's clearly a running problem.

As stated in the General Community Guidelines

• No trolling whatsoever. Verbally attacking a person will get you banned.

30 minutes ago, Jacklyn said:

And also the admins decided that my ban didn't even need a formal request on the forums, Moo moo just brought it straight to them and they decided to ban me without considering the thoughts of the players??? what the fudge is up with that???

Sometimes things being dealt privately is better than making a thread on everything, since it's very easy for threads to get derailed and turn into a poopstorm, and the reporter may want to stay anonymous, which leads to bringing it directly to higherups the best course of action.

32 minutes ago, Jacklyn said:

I know that it's a month because of my previous bans from Kypari, but I think even those bans are debatable. Everyone knows he hates my guts and just jumps at the chance to punish me for any minute reason he can find at the time. (He's even wrongly banned me for a month in the past and it got instantly repealed because it was unfair) 

He isn't the only one to have banned you, even though his may be the majority.  It's unfair to say he's jumping at any chance he can to ban you for any reason he can find, you have had 3 bans in the course of just a couple of months, so this clearly is becoming a more prevalent issue, otherwise we wouldn't be here right now.

35 minutes ago, Jacklyn said:

Got banned FOR A MONTH because Moo -Moo reported me for being toxic. I think my ban is pretty unfair because I only said a few things and I thought we were all just having some fun bantering with eachother. Really it seemed to me like Moo -Moo was unphased by what I had said judging by his responses.  

(Answered this one in my first paragraph as well)

35 minutes ago, Jacklyn said:

At the very least I think my ban should be rolled down to a week.

-1

Sure, I love halloween!

Unfortunately, your application as been denied.

Note: n/a

Closed~

+1,  he's definitely improved and has actively been trying to improve regardless.  I haven't seen him particularly much myself, but from what I've seen he's had very positive changes!

A:7

M:7

You have been denied from becoming a member, but you may reapply in a month!

• You must have a minimum of 12 hours on our servers

Closed~

Closed due to OP's request.

Closed~

You have been denied from becoming a member, but you may reapply in a month!

• You must have a minimum of 12 hours on our servers

Closed~

I'll keep the application open for a couple of days to see if he ends up meeting the required hours by then.  Thanks for the heads up @YeEternalTuna

Ok so a better question would be, are we capping heavy or not? Literally just do + or - 1, and we can go from there.  Since so far the basis looks like if we are capping heavy, then we are capping sniper.  Although I'd still like to cap the other classes, I'm willing to change my vote on stuff if needs be.  I'm fine with really any outcome we decide on since I don't see really any of them harming the server in any way, but I do have my preference, which would be what Elcark suggested, a cap of 4 on the classes we've discussed minus on the Medic.  Once we decide on heavy we can go from there, since I don't really see this conversation going anywhere the way it is right now..

+1 to cap heavy

@Elcark@mrnutty12@Kypari

Caleb. Caleb of the 956th division of Sand.

The 9 stands for the different legions under my control, each one controlling a different aspect of my kingdom, based on my orders.

The 5 stands for the generation of Sand Leader that we are on, before me there was uneasiness, and no confidence in the order, with me in the throne, we are strong, but only in numbers.

The 6 stands for the number of opposing clans we have vanquished, all of them much greater at one time than the Kingdom of Sand.  We have faith that we would come out victorious, and we prevailed through.
 

Or maybe the numbers at the end of my name are random..... Iunno.

You have been denied from becoming a member, but you may reapply in a month!

Closed~

53 minutes ago, Kypari said:

I don't understand how on earth you would get to that conclusion. The knockback that sniper provides happens so rarely and it's almost ineffective to a point where it's more of an inconvenience than a big deal. When have you ever approached a group of people as hale and thought "oh no these snipers are knocking me back so far i cant get to them"?

You can't compare the two AT ALL and there is literally no reason to add a cap where it is not needed. We should be disencouraging caps, not adding them for the sake of it or because some class has a bit of knockback in their kit (being almost insignificant in comparison to other classes). 

Sniper stops the boss. Heavy launches the boss.

7 hours ago, mrnutty12 said:

The sniper can knock the hale back far easier than the heavy can, and doesn't require him to taunt to do that. I maintain that if we are capping the heavy for such reasons that you should cap the sniper for it as well. I rarely see more than a couple of traditional heavy players in a given round anyways, but it doesn't make much sense to me to cap them when other classes can accomplish similar things without requiring them to taunt for crits at all.

9 hours ago, Elcark said:

Considering what has been said though, if we do see it as necessary to keep a cap on sniper (I agree with kypari that we really don't) and for the sake of not putting caps that are too unnecessary but still keeping things from becoming unfair to the hale by sheer spam, then perhaps a cap of four for all four classes. 

I'm cool with a cap of 4 on all of them except maybe medic, I still don't think medic should be capped, but after reading through there are fair points about how it feels for bosses fighting a large amount of medics, I'd be OK with a cap, same with Heavy.

Forums won't let me delete this tag or add any more..ree

@mrnutty12