MineCrack

Ease of Access

To what? Something nobody is going to use anyways?

How exactly would this encourage people to interact with the social media?

There's no incentive sorry to say.

Minecwaft = dead.

Unless you got serious adverisement (like paying a youtuber or purchasing ads on server listing sites) it's going to stay dead. Events are okay for a few hours but won't sustain the server.

 

• Pauses
  These are something that have been heavily abused lately, it was funny "WAS" it is no more than just aggravating for players in the server now, you might get a laugh out of it, but take into account the other 9 people in the server. There should be no reason for us (adam) to implement a captain only pausing feature, but we might have too.
  

Or just restrict it from people who abuse it. Pausing is pretty important and more than often the result of something unexpected coming up or a bathroom break.

• Sportsmanship | Respect
  We are a community, not a bunch of random people joining a pug and fragging out, we organize 10mans and play them to improve and have fun. It is apparent that there is a skill gap in a majority of the players who do play in these games, that does not excuse you to completely disrespect those players.
   
  I will give one major example in my opinion of blatant disrespect / unsportsmanlike conduct.
  T Side is up 9-0, it's clear they are heavily favored in winning so what do they do? Continue to buy p90's, scouts, and pistols for the remainder of the game. It's clear you're winning the game, it is clear they are not going to come back, instead of throwing away rounds to give yourself more enjoyment, end the game let them learn from their mistakes.
  

If 10 mans are for people to improve and have fun why restrict what guns you can use when you are winning? I mean, autosnipers and heavy machine guns are already restricted. Now you're proposing when people are winning by a significant margin they are no longer allowed to use fun weapons such as deagles/scouts? That's not even unsportsmanlike, it's just people trying to have fun.

You didn't even mention how people complain about the teams at the start of the game because they're not balanced (mudkip every game). Or when people throw because of that(BLEED ON TRAIN).

• Tilt
  4 people say NT at the same time targeting me and attempt to tilt/annoy me.
  I'm playing a lurk spot while my team pushes A on inferno, I get killed while holding an angle, and i'm hit with the young "Debatable" bind.
  

Kinda funny how people rate informative, then do jack shit.

 

Why is there no one ever on CS:GO servers... :thinking:

 

Why do we need to schedule events to populate CS:GO servers... :thinking:

 

eh, who cares about them anyways lol!

#REVAMPXG2017

Don't think anybody cares anymore, or are busy with school. It's also kind of hard to populate dead community servers with no regulars.

xG has definitely fallen in the ranks and this thread is a clear indication of why.

>LAFF

LOOOOL

Why are you letting random Internet retards get to you? Not too late to come back.

Don't let retards dictate what you do.

More like a ttt server where you must drink a shot every time you get innocent. Get the meme? Every body will be dead within an hour xD

First you need to learn authenticate Japanese to communicate fluently with Japanese Java.

Also the IG surf server is fucking LIT.

btw fyi you can check on the steam store to see what os are supported.

@MineCrack

people telling you

One person.

@MineCrack

 

higherups

at some point one of the higher ups (i believe @Ohstopyou, not sure tho)

@MineCrack

 

issued the unspoken rule in the past and there has never been a formal announcement on if it is reverted or not.

If you read the entire thread apparently someone higher up changed it in the past that -1s dont negate +1s which some staff apparently followed till today, and also op post never talks about a certain number of -1s instantly closing applications so i dunno where you read that, or if he edited it out.

I'm actually so confused.

I kind of just glanced at the original post and after thoroughly reading it I'm still confused because that is how member applications currently work.

 

To get accepted you need X amount of upvotes, any downvotes negates an upvote. What I originally got from OP is that after a certain amount of downvotes you just get declined.

 

Anyone who accepted an applicant without following the criteria above is an idiot.

As far as I know @Lithium is working on a new server for CS:GO, and we have plans to release way more things into hub soon. I'll start helping with population as well once school isn't so heavy

https://na.op.gg/summoner/userName=kingaegean

if we stuck to that logic we would also just remove applications for membership and make it so that whoever registers gets instant membership and we'd also allow everyone to wear the xG tag

that's not the case, imo cause we put a meaning behind membership and again in my very personal opinion, reducing the required amount of vouches, lowering the age limit, nullifying -1's etc. is doing nothing more than removing the meaning of membership

 

i mean i have been fine with any changes in the age limit, any changes in the vouch requirements and all that but removing the power of -1's is one thing i genuinely disagree with

 

 

i believe the suggestion is that we make it so that every single -1 cancels out one +1, idk what you mean here

I'm actually so confused.

I kind of just glanced at the original post and after thoroughly reading it I'm still confused because that is how member applications currently work.

To get accepted you need X amount of upvotes, any downvotes negates an upvote. What I originally got from OP is that after a certain amount of downvotes you just get declined.

Anyone who accepted an applicant without following the criteria above is an idiot.

CSGO division kind of needs a revamp if we want it to get population on the community servers again. Like plugin wise our jailbreak server is miles ahead some of the other popular JB servers (except hg).

I spoke to @Rhododendron and @Aegean a few weeks ago about a major csgo revamp. We brainstormed but I kind of just went inactive after that, not exactly sure if they still plan on revamping csgo.

I mean -1s matter. I do see where this thread is coming from though. Steven got a few -1s when applying to cs:go about issues that are way more evident now since he is comfortable with everyone. At the time I felt that those -1s were underwhelming.

However I don't think an accumulation of -1s should deny entry of someone into the clan. xG shouldn't be an exclusive club, especially since we're just a gaming community. Making it so that -1s have the ability to flat out deny someone from the clan is in fact ridiculous, I am very aware of clicks in this clan. With that being said if one person is not exactly friends with one click in the clan they can come together and -1 said person.

Lastly, this is just my opinion. However if this were to be implemented into member applications then there needs to be a higher limit for -1s. Possibly 150% or more of the total required votes to get in.

Yeah after you play through the missions the game gets kind of stale unless youre loaded. I definitely played 15+ more hours than I would have because a cheater gave me money.

You should try shaders with a realism pack.

The mobile version chat box for the default theme currently has new messages ascending from the top. Can this be reverted? Or at least for the mobile version?

The area where you type your messages is still towards the bottom so you can't see new messages from people you may be chatting with until you scroll up. Plus scrolling down now scrolls the chat box down to older messages unless you scroll on the side of the page.

Tl;Dr current chatbox makes mobile version aids plz revert @Rhododendron

Why is this thread even a thing?

You can't get his MAC Address through tf2. Even if tf2 provided a way to access a user's MAC Address they can still change it. Anyone willing to evade IP bans would be willing to evade a MAC ban. It's a flawed idea to begin with.

The problem at hand is an issue that comes with any free game. The solution is not simple. If someone wants to ban evade over and over the best you can do is make it a hassle to do so. Inevitably, said solutions would effect legitimate players.

If this wasn't already apparent, I will be inactive for a while. Uni started back up (2nd week in) and classes are starting to roll in a lot of work. A few other things are going on too that are keeping me busy. Don't have much time for video games (EXCEPT RUNESCAPE AM I RIGHT @Rabid ) or xG.

So I'll be inactive until the summer.

Lastly, I want to thank @SuperMaddud for taking over minecraft. As of right now I hate every aspect of that game and still don't know how some people can tolerate running a minecraft server.

Toodles!

+1 if youre not allowed to build

I understand its not a viable solution i just think it is a good trend to start getting into with ten mans so everyone is in ts and ready to start when you are in game.

Yeah but if it's not viable why do it? You proposed a solution for something that was never a problem.