Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/09/15 in all areas
-
3 points
Protestation
Kypari and 2 others reacted to Blizzard for a post in a topic
As a person that regularly plays on xG servers and has spent somewhere between 7-9 months on xG I've been wanting to join the clan for a while now, but I was 13 when the age requirement was 14 and still today I'm 13. My birthday is under a month from now (June 4th) and I'm starting to hop over to the xG MC server too (Bliz was taken so my mc username is Bliz_) I feel as if not being part of the clan makes me miss out on the fun of dedicating most of my tf2 time on the xG servers themselves and I've been doing my best to shape FF2 with my boss recommendations, map recommendations, and other server suggestions in general and have grown a reputation as a familiar face for those reasons too. If I may, I would love to be able to sign up as a member on my birthday if the age restriction has changed. (which has brought a lot of discomfort and controversy among the community) I don't care if the restriction is lifted in exchange for more vouches from specific staff as long as I'm able to pursue the overdue desire of being an xG member. -Blib (or then again I can just join o.W.n. or TTT, HA jk. Never in my life) @Rejects @Ohstopyou @NitNat @Diamonde @Dethman @Hype Halp me fite for dis. -
3 points
Protestation
Blizzard and 2 others reacted to jaygoki for a post in a topic
leave the current system w/o an age limit. We can decide who is mature and who isn't through personal experience. just my 2 cents -
2 points
Gigyas - Team Fortress 2
Hype and one other reacted to Ohstopyou for a post in a topic
I guess, I just want him to acknowledge this thread so we won't have to worry about this in the future. Just want to make sure HE won't get out of hand. -
2 points
Protestation
RinAoi and one other reacted to Dethman for a post in a topic
How about instead of ratings that people can just bullshit with random numbers we actually have explain why he is mature and good for the clan in like a sentence or too and not just putting "He is a mature player and active on pokemon" but like....: +1 Maturity: "He is very polite to all people and represents everything we need in this community, I have personally not seen a problem except *insert problem*. Active: "He is an active user on the pokemon trade server and plays during the day on weekends. I have seen him on the servers for a good 4 months now and i feel he should be in the clan." Also instead of raising it on people just make it 10 vouches for people 16+ in TF2 and 15 vouches for 14+ if not ridding the age all together Some people might be interested: @Blizzard @Beefalo @ShogunYao @Speedeh @jerry @Rhododendron @kbraszzz @Ohstopyou @Moosty @metalslug53 @Rejects @Nomulous @DrLee @diabeetus @Hidingmaster @ThePenguin what do you think? -
2 points
Cls These Days
Goblin and one other reacted to Insane for a post in a topic
you can touch my raw meat ;) -
1 pointDivision: Team Fortress 2 In-Game Name: Vaporeon Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:52553144 Banned: No Previously in xG: Yes Active on Teamspeak: No Time Active: ~2 years Age: 21 Further Information: Alright, sorry for the invalid application. Let's try this again. @metalslug53
-
1 point
-
1 point
Garrbear, Calculus - Team Fortress 2
The_Unlit_Torch reacted to XHina_sanX for a post in a topic
+1 bullying is bad -
1 pointTheadore has rejected from going to the forums in the past and continues under good circumstances. I say we have someone just steamchat then take a screencap of it.
-
1 pointNot happy with that kind of language on the servers. It's blatantly obvious they were trolling. So to list all of the reasons for a ban: trolling, racial slurs, not to mention they're fucking filling up the chat with spam and stupid comments. I'd be down for a three-day ban as they both came on the server with the intent of causing mischieve.
-
1 pointI don't really know here. This isn't great obviously but as far as what I've seen this isn't that bad. It looks to me like some memelords just wanted to be edgy and irritate someone on the internet. I'd be okay with a day or two ban as a deterrent, but anything more seems like an overstep. Read all of the chatlogs and nothing really stands out as perm-worthy. I'll wait for more opinions before changing from 0. @kbraszzz @Rejects @metalslug53 @Ohstopyou
-
1 point
Garrbear, Calculus - Team Fortress 2
realBelloWaldi reacted to Dethman for a post in a topic
+1 bullying should never be allowed on our servers -
1 pointtesticularMeltdown:
-
1 pointAimbot more obvious than an erection
-
1 point
-
1 pointAlso, for the new system that Bello suggested. Under 16 and Under 14 should both require verified server time. That means the leadership must verify that they are actually active on our servers.
-
1 pointOr you could just wait until you're old enough. I'm not seeing any 17 year olds causing the issues, just though under 16 and european.
-
1 pointJust finished watching the footage. Seems pretty obvious to me that it's an aimbot. @DLs and @CLs, what are your thoughts? Just want another higher-up's opinion before pulling the trigger on this one.
-
1 point
Protestation
Tsuchikure reacted to Dethman for a post in a topic
I dont think the staff member -1 closing should happen since if one higher up does not like him but the rest do he can -1 and that application is rip. And also the 15 +1's, are should just be under 16 in general not 15 years of age. If anything it should be like this If you're 16+ You need at least 10 vouches If you're 14 or 15 years of age You need a division leader or a division manager to vouch for you. You need 15 +1s If you're under 14: You need a division leader to vouch for you. You need a division manager to vouch for you. You need an admin and a mod to vouch for you You need at least 20 +1s. Also can we add a what server do you go on section in the application so people know what server he goes on without having to ask? @Rhododendron @Ohstopyou @kbraszzz @Nomulous @DrLee @diabeetus @Hidingmaster @ThePenguin What do you think about this? -
1 point
Protestation
Kypari reacted to realBelloWaldi for a post in a topic
I have an idea. Let's say: If you're 16+ You need at least 10 vouches If you're under 16 (but over 14) You need a division leader or a division manager to vouch for you. You need 15 +1s If you're under 14: You need a division leader to vouch for you. You need a division manager to vouch for you. You need an admin to vouch for you You need at least 20 +1s. If one of the said staff members -1 you, your member application gets closed immediately. What do you think about this system? -
1 point
Theonlyanubis
Kypari reacted to The_Unlit_Torch for a post in a topic
Underage, even though I hate this rule. @kbraszzz @Ohstopyou @Rejects @Moosty @metalslug53 le closeroni -
1 point
Protestation
Blizzard reacted to The_Unlit_Torch for a post in a topic
+1 There should not be an age limit. Age does not reflect maturity. There shouldn't be a maturity test either: if the person applying is immature, people will just -1 him. It's not rocket science. What would the difference be? These words sound curiously similar to me. -
1 point
-
1 pointAh yes, Sweden, a proud member of that exclusive pantheon of countries dumb enough to invade Russia during the winter. kappa Also, please don't make any more of these "insert random country name here" threads. One of them was enough. If you really feel the need to post something like this, just make it a reply to one of the existing threads.
-
1 point
America
Brian reacted to Hidingmaster for a post in a topic
I mean.. We only need one rating if we got an america one. -
0 pointsI'm going to be out of town for a while because of a family vacation, so I won't be on at all during this time, I might check forums occasionally while I'm gone but otherwise I'll be going rip for the next week. What's going on? A family member of mine is getting married and graduating in the same week, so I'm attending it. Unfortunately it is being held, both events, in Washington D.C. so I have a long flight ahead of me, traveling, tourism etc. Don't take this the wrong way-I'm not leaving xG, I'm just going inactive... even more.
-
0 pointswell in the logs of his chat Xeno Gamers - Player Chat History he says that the spawn camp is going further than the rule intends and that if he hadn't done that a mod/admin would have. I'll just throw this out there, looking at that video, I would have cleared it out too. I know the rule says that only admins can deem a spawncamp "unbreakable" but I mean shit.... they aren't always around and I think what he did was in the right, he cleared out the dozen or so blus + 2 sentries and other building and then it looks like he went back to normal. I don't think he should be punished or at the most, told to try and contact a staff member first next time.
-
0 points-1 I'd like to disagree with that, that was a pretty gnarly spawn camp... and it looks like he only did it to clear them out. Just my 2¢
-
0 points
Vaporeon
Kypari reacted to ColdEndeavour for a post in a topic
If only I was still a member, I'd send a vouch your way. :c -
0 points
Well The Time Has Come...
ArminArmout reacted to Flareon for a post in a topic
Here lies my slow internet 2014-2015 @Ohstopyou Bye people -
0 points
Vaporeon
Osiris reacted to The_Unlit_Torch for a post in a topic
+1 nice guy and not gayporneon which is a plus. A:idfk M:9 -
-1 points
-
-1 points
-
-1 points
-
-1 points
-
-1 points