Forest
- D
-
Content Count
3856 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
74
Everything posted by Forest
-
Fan of Resident Evil 2? Also a fan of board games? http://steamforged.com/sfg-news-blog/re2tbg Check this shit out
-
Disregard my previous post about making a specific role then, makes it moot if the channel itself can be hidden already by the public.
-
May want to consider dropping down a line in our rules and adding an excerpt from the previously linked Discord guidelines should the NSFW channel not be removed; or at the very least outline the severity of breaking Discord's own guidelines. Additionally, probably highlight the fact that the 'NSFW' channel is exempt from rules A, B, and C with the exception of X, Y and Z or something along those lines. Unrelated to that, I do agree that we keep things in line with our current structure of rules, but do keep in mind that our [game] Servers are Public and that it is explicitly stated what we do or do not allow ingame. With that in mind, provided that the channel is explicitly stating that it is a channel that is 'NSFW' (would also recommend throwing an "18+ only" in there somewhere, just for the principle of the matter) it is entirely up to the discretion of the user to voluntarily access it. Simply put, the differences are that: Discord The user has to go out of their way to willingly view the content and upon accessing it, has acknowledged the fact that the content in the channel is 'NSFW' and that they are alright with viewing it. Game Server The user is not subjected to such content because it is publicly against the rules of the server; it is not tolerated in any shape or form and therefore the user can expect not to see any 'NSFW' content. Notice that the main distinction is that the user is either willingly accessing that sort of content, or willingly accepts that it is not permitted and can therefore expect not to see it. The users are not expected to enter the 'NSFW' channel, nor will they ever have to. It doesn't make sense to compare the two as they share very little in common, other than the fact that both are endorsed by Xeno Gamers. With that said, I'm fine with it as long as the following [previously mentioned in the thread] is considered: 1. Implementation of a role to allow users to access the channel 2. Routine monitoring to ensure that the content does not breach our own rules/terms as well as Discord's
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zh0yH12Wemc
-
Mmm, that new Division smell. Would recommend throwing this up in Steam, unless it's in a 'development' phase and will be officially announced when it's good and ready? EDIT: Disregard, just saw the Steam 'Events' kek
-
RIP Post #309761, you will be missed. https://xenogamers.com/posts/309761/ https://i.gyazo.com/9ed5b6217206f88976902f4f171f9ba7.png
-
hi
-
Forgot to tag for a verdict: @Bello @Vexx @mrnutty12 @Sesh
-
Disclosure: before saying what I have to say, just going to make a note that I did not view the demo attached so I will be basing this off of what Elcark said. First things first, if it's true that the Player was banned for aimbotting and the demo doesn't provide clear or accurate support for the accusation, then the permanent ban should be rendered null. As for the validity of the aforementioned 'exploit', @sigterm regardless of the fact that the "record;stop" function is an expected outcome introduced by Valve, utilizing it in a way that is outside of its intended use to create an unfair advantage for yourself is definitely exploiting/cheating and is thereby against our General Server rules; however, I do not believe that this constitutes a permanent ban (nor should the fact that the Player was accused of 'aimbotting' be used as any sort of leverage). With that said, based on the fact that: 1) we do not necessarily issue bans based on exploits/cheating (written in writing) and 2) the Player was not warned [assumption] prior to this ban not to abuse the exploit/cheat, I would suggest that the Player be unbanned with this thread serving as their first [and final] warning (given the nature of the situation) to not abuse this exploit/cheat on our Servers again. Now, I don't want to call anybody out, but for future reference; it should not take a few days for a verdict to be reached in regards to a Ban that was [possibly] wrongly dealt. It should also not take a few days for a Higher-Up to follow up on this thread. Last but not least, the Player posting the Ban Protest should not have to be the one to bump the thread for a verdict.
-
I remember when Silence routinely visited populated Servers to dick around with shit ranging from global ear-rape explosions, screamers, and general mic spam.
-
Not before @TurdWig or @DeathGod but hi
-
What are you gonna wear while you're clubbing?
-
I remember the great of 2013 in CS:GO
-
@Bello @Vexx @mrnutty12 @Sesh @Aegean This dude has been waiting for 4 days, verdict?
-
I remember when Towelie practically vowed revenge on xG for banning him by creating a 'rival' clan (Wolven Dominion) that lasted an astounding 1-2 months.
-
I remember when we used to have a CSS sub-section on the forums :(
-
Xeno Gamers Once again, Player(s) being banned with excessive ban times when a day-ban for the same rules broken never previously occurred on the Player's record. Not going to provide a vouch, but Higher-Ups need to clarify on whether this is how ban times should be stacking or not. With that said, would also like to recommend a new set of punishments to deal with Chat and Mic spam for Servers that have this feature; ideally revoking the user's Chat/Mic privileges via Comms ban for a pre-determined amount of time depending on the severity of the case before escalating to a Server ban.
-
I remember when people actually read the OP :coffee:
-
Work indirectly for EA as a contractor (working for VMC). Long-story short, I'm a Game Tester (QA); though it is actually a lot more demanding than it sounds. Honestly, for an Entry level position, it has a lot of perks and is really worth all of the time and effort; not to mention you work full-time right off the bat (5 days a week, 9 AM to 5:30 PM). And with the experience you gain, it also greatly increases your chances of being hired directly under EA while fleshing out your resume. My only grievance is the pay, but I imagine I would be saying the same thing if I were working anywhere else. Pros: - Stable position depending on the team you are on - Access to an on-site outdoor Soccer pitch, Volleyball court (sand), Basketball/Hockey court - Access to an indoor Gym (work-out area) - Permitted to bring your dog into work to keep at your desk all day, every day - Access to several areas with free arcade game setups - Numerous areas to gain experience in to build up your resume - If you're egotistic, your name in the Credits of whatever title you are working on (Triple-A titles like Battlefront, FIFA, etc.) Cons: - Low income, comes with the Entry level position - Access to aforementioned areas requires a monthly subscription Been working there around 3 years now, and I can definitely see myself making a career out of this field of work. Hoping to work full-time directly under EA though!
-
I remember when our CS:S Division Leader (good ol' one-two Ponch) went awol and turned out to be in jail. Good times, goooood times... I also remember when we could comment on posts.
-
I remember when the Tunnel Snakes ruled here at Xeno Gamers
-
Your basic nostalgia thread. I'll be taking a stroll down memory lane, anyone care to join me? Let's start off nice and easy: I remember when our Counter-Strike Division was our most prominent one that contested with the likes of HG :coffee: Disclaimer: any posts containing 'flammable material' are susceptible to being spam rated. Users are not to "quote" anyone else's post in any shape or form; the only way to interact with another post is by rating it or by 'mentioning' a user. By no means is anyone allowed to instigate a debate/argument/discussion in this thread. This thread is to be taking in a completely satirical way; however, do not make things personal. @Higher-Ups please ensure that this does not happen by deleting any posts that breach this disclaimer in any way.
-
Don't take this the wrong way, but the same could be said regarding those who don't agree with the rules and regulations that we have set in place. I understand that this whole thing can (and most likely is) be frustrating, but to engage in a discussion as monumental as this while retaining a closed-minded perspective is only going to exacerbate your own attitude or behaviour on the topic at hand. In other words, if you want to have a civil discussion, then I would not recommend going down the "but it's a stupid rule anyways" route or to start letting it affect you on a personal level, which seems to be happening based on your responses. Mind you, I'm not saying that you aren't capable of having this sort of discussion so much as I am saying that in order for your own opinion to have any sort of credibility or sway, you need to be able to receive feedback/criticism in a constructive way. With that said, you need to realize that the enforcement of rules and regulations based on a Staff Member's preference is something that is incredibly difficult to manage. On paper, it is a completely viable way of cutting down on bias; but in practice it is an incredibly difficult thing to do. In all fairness, we only have one or two Division Managers who manage the Staff of their respective Division. There is absolutely no way they can monitor every single Staff Member during every hour of the day. This is why we rely so heavily on our Players for feedback. If you can provide names and ample evidence to support claims that the Staff in question is/are working outside of our own rules, then our Higher-Ups can address the problem areas directly. Our Players are our eyes and ears on the Servers when our Higher-Ups cannot be. As previously mentioned in your other thread, this is why we have 'Member Protest' and 'Report Abuse' sections of our forums: to address problem areas with Members or Staff. For the record, I agree 100% that there is definitely a large amount of bias in terms of what Staff say, do, or even enforce in terms of rules. I've seen my fair share of contradictory actions, but it is what it is and there is only so much our Higher-Ups can do.
