Moosty
- D
-
Content Count
1919 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
27
Everything posted by Moosty
-
Honestly I don't want to be the hater but this might work better in Cs:go. Only recently did tf2 start making items marketable, so a large amount of stuff we could give away (Craft hats, metal, any misc from before they had misc crates) just won't get accepted since it's not marketable. Cs:Go has been using marketable skins for years and barely has any items that can't be bought and sold on the market. While the tf2 marketable stuff is so much harder to come by, and low tier marketables are basically limited to new players who invest in tf2 updates the last two years (hue) and strange weapons. Basically, there are far more low tier csgo items than tf2 items that would qualify, and since csgo is a paid game and tf2 isn't, giving cheap skins to tf2 players is meh to me. Otherwise it's really just finding cheap tf2 gun skins on the market just to donate, tl;dr tf2 has less than half the available marketables to donate, and the ones it does have, are not commonly laying around like csgo drops.
-
No plz but whole separate issue. +1 I was wondering why I could also "abuse" (not actual abuse if it's a plugin but using to gain advantage) on ff2 and jump off a cliff and get bhop speed at hyper heavys as hale and get em, and as stated, just dip whenever hale got near. Haven't played it on trade servers but I'd assume it's less of a gameplay issue. I mean, getting backstabbed by bhop spies and lit by bhop pyros sucks, but it's more fair when one side has an "equal" opportunity to just turn or bhop away without OP stats.
-
Yeah I'll +1 for probationary mod, seems like the type who would make good staff amd he's plenty active.
-
Hey if we didn't want the credits and had some, say, craft hats and miscs we never used. Would the bot take them off our hands and distribute them without credit payout as "EWW" rank prizes, or just not accept them?
-
Ya boy got a 93% on that math test tho.
-
Great idea, but what about unmarketables? Bp.tf price?
-
People seem to think I'm upset or offended by this, I'm not, and I don't think it's sexual. My issue was that nothing in our rules said "non sexual nudity can be allowed" or "if it's just lines it's fine" It's confusing to new players who get spawned in front of it while the motd contradicts what they're seeing. If we allow exceptions at higher up discretion that's fine, I'd just like to see it written down somewhere. Even a catch all "higher ups can allow exceptions if a consensus is reached" above or below ALL of our rules.
-
I feel personally attacked
- 11 replies
-
- 2
-
-
-
- july
- screenshot
- (and 2 more)
-
*Swoons* MY HERO...
-
Now I'll complain later but I genuinely have a test to study for, if I didn't have to leave for it I would have hit 14 right about now, see you nerds tonight, phone is off no notifications
-
RIP. I'll be back though. (Should have been like @TheSupremePatriot and made a thread for a 5 day trip, didn't seem necessary, no more judging you supreme ;) Only off by two hours and have made some drastic life changes, namely quitting weed entirely and starting my day with the gym instead of a wake and bake. I'm passing all my summer classes and am genuinely happier, this is just a hiccup, I'll be back to staff real quick :) I genuinely haven't felt this good in years, aside from being unable to walk without pain lol.
-
No that's a perfectly valid outcome. My issue is with the rule contradiction, not the map itself.
-
Don't claim to know more about weed and then say it's a gateway drug, disproven AF. And as for the rest of your post those are valid reasons to -1. But they're lxgics personal issues, not a weed issue. Don't blame the drug if he isn't being mature. That's just called immaturity. We have stoners that can effectively do their job and some that can't, clearly weed isn't the deciding factor in that, it's personal responsibility and maturity. And miss me with gateway drug nonsense.
-
Yeah I'm going to switch to a -1 for unban, too much smoke for there to be no fire, and we have quite a consensus.
-
I will add though (can't edit on phone plz) that even if you are smoking not to do it over mic or throw it in peoples faces, as I talked to you about today. I got called out on it and it was deserved, so I stopped. It makes us look bad. But as for you on your own time, go for it.
-
Honestly these responses are just ignorance. Weed is objectively safer/less judgement affecting than alcohol, and we let people of legal age drink. weed is legal where I am and I'm high on the servers fairly often (I've kind of been cutting back in general but that's personal and beside the point) someone being fit for staff really doesn't have much to do with intoxicants. If you abuse because you're drunk/high then you weren't fit staff, it wasn't the drugs fault. As for forgetfullness yeah he might miss a chat spam here or there, but we all do that anyway, nobody can read it 24/7. If he's fit staff his choice of how to relax has no effect on that, and if it does, he was never fit staff. Tl;dr mature people gonna be mature, immature people gonna be immature, stop blaming substances and blame yourself, because it's your fault. Drugs and drink don't make good staff go bad, those people just were bad staff. As for the thread +1 for probationary mod. I talked to him today about this and the rules and he's got a good head on his shoulders. I honestly don't think him winding down with some bud is going to drastically change that, because it doesn't drastically change people.
-
denied PSA: New rule regarding sprays, avatars and customizable items
Moosty replied to realBelloWaldi's topic in TF2 Discussion
Any naked humanoid that isn't artistic sketches -
Neutral for now. Played with him tonight and he was good but I still got some shots in he didn't seem superhuman. I wore tags though so he might have been being careful or not toggled yet. In my eyes I wouldn't be shocked either way so I'll wait till I see a demo.
-
and if you're saying artistic nudity is pg and not pg-13, I'll argue that until the cows come home, because I feel that's incorrect Edit: PG - 13 not R, it's clearly beyond Disney/pixar
-
I'm not saying it's erotic porn that I want to jack my ding dong too I'm saying it blatantly breaks our rules and we should either edit the rules or edit the map. you're correct about the difference between art and pornography, now throw what you just posted in our rules and my complaints are over. it's the lack of transparency and blatant ignoring of our own rules I have a problem with, not the semantics of what is and isn't pornography. or whether pornography is inherently sexual. put in the rule "no nudity unless DM+ find it has artistic value" and it's problem solved, I just don't see why people are so big on Keeping the map unchanged AND ignoring the fact that it breaks our rules. I'm not attacking anyone here just pointing out that we're contradicting ourself
-
I would have loved to get an uncensored shot but donators noclipped to cover too quickly, and removing sprays so I can UNCOVER nudity seemed shady, But it isn't a "just a rough sketch" when you have defined flaps and areolas. It's maybe "as close to a rough sketch to be considered unfinished" but except for a missing arm it's a complete image, and arms aren't what's under discussion here. but next time I'm on the map I'll be sure to post a full minge shot and uncover censoring sprays if need be, as long as I have your permission, I want all the info possible in this thread, so people can make an informed decision. Edit: and not a single person can possibly genuinely believe this huge ass billboard of nudity "goes unnoticed" like a tiny model of a magazine
-
Hey remember how we instantly removed that map because it broke our rules? ..But it was funny while it lasted ;)
-
A pixelated porn magazine on the ground, half the size of a scout model, that you can avoid. and a non pixelated naked woman, vag flaps, bush, and nips unpixelated and detailed, 10ish scout models tall, that the map randomly spawns you in front of are very different. and Whether porn or not, it's detailed, unpixelated nudity, and not pg:13. if we keep it I just want consistency in the rules
-
Schools have permission slips that tell parents when nudity is coming. We are random spawning players in front of a Vag and Bush the size of a playermodel with no warning. If parent's didn't want their kids seeing the "artistic nudity" they had the option not too. can you see how that's different than dropping randoms in front of a hairy bush with no warning?
